Comments on: Obama’s South Asian envoy and the Kashmir conundrum http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2009/01/24/obamas-south-asian-envoy-and-the-kashmir-conundrum/ Perspectives on Pakistan Thu, 01 Oct 2015 19:31:05 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.5 By: Al Baloushi http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2009/01/24/obamas-south-asian-envoy-and-the-kashmir-conundrum/comment-page-2/#comment-11815 Sun, 01 Feb 2009 07:04:58 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=1681#comment-11815 Before answering my emails you should have read the comments of Mr.Rajeev, you Indians are very good at propaganda’s, and that also without looking at fact and figures. I mean I was replying to rajeev’s statistics which he mentioned proudly and accused us for nexuses with China, Saudi Arabia and other friendly countries. One more and clear message for you and other your like minded peoples, before sending missiles to Pakistan, think not once but thrice…..I hope you understand what I mean.

]]>
By: Blogger http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2009/01/24/obamas-south-asian-envoy-and-the-kashmir-conundrum/comment-page-2/#comment-11777 Sat, 31 Jan 2009 19:42:10 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=1681#comment-11777 Al Baloushi
…Pakistani’s fought USSR… 😛

So many Mughalistan yet Pakistan didn’t get funds for Bail-out.
How did India got with only one Hindustan… Per capita differences….

]]>
By: Blogger http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2009/01/24/obamas-south-asian-envoy-and-the-kashmir-conundrum/comment-page-2/#comment-11776 Sat, 31 Jan 2009 19:35:47 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=1681#comment-11776 …Most of the Indian nuclear technology and weapons machinery comes from the former USSR…

— Great so next time when India drops a missile on Pakistan territory then it will be blamed on USSR.

Didn’t I forgot that most of the Missiles owned by Pakistan were Chinese Missiles renamed with Islamic names..
Next time if Pakistan drops something we will attack China lol
If world goes this way looks great 😛

]]>
By: Al Baloushi http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2009/01/24/obamas-south-asian-envoy-and-the-kashmir-conundrum/comment-page-2/#comment-11741 Sat, 31 Jan 2009 04:32:14 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=1681#comment-11741 Dear Rajeev, before accussing Pakistan and its friends, just look at yours deeds. Most of the Indian nuclear technology and weapons machinery comes from the former USSR. Indra Ghandhi and Braznov’s nexes is well known to the entire world. Do not talk about reputation of Pakistan, if we are so bad people why all these leaders are visiting our country every other day. The fact is that we fought America/European war with former USSR, those warrier who were given the name of Mujahideen now become terrorist. Before 1979 (USSR attached Afghanistan) Pakistan had not such problems and life was quite normal.

]]>
By: N. Javed http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2009/01/24/obamas-south-asian-envoy-and-the-kashmir-conundrum/comment-page-2/#comment-11608 Fri, 30 Jan 2009 05:42:37 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=1681#comment-11608 Keeping KASHMIR swept under the rug may be a good short term cushion for India, but a bad long term one, for sooner or later Kashmir will HAVE to be solved. In the meantime, they will continue living on pins and needles in India, all the while spending BILLIONS in Kashmir alone.

In fact the KASHMIR chorus is now emanating from every corner of the global leaders, not just Messrs. Obama and Miliband. If you think that Holbrook will leave Pakistan with nothing, well, then you better think again! India has finally put itself under the global microscope.

What is she waiting for next… Bangalore, Madras, Calcutta, etc.

HELLLLLLLLOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!! HELP US HELP YOU!

]]>
By: rajeev http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2009/01/24/obamas-south-asian-envoy-and-the-kashmir-conundrum/comment-page-2/#comment-11596 Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:55:08 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=1681#comment-11596 Dear Al Baloushi and other Pakistani Friends:

What Pakistani reputation to save? You got no worries there since you have no good reputation.

Are you not Ashamed of the reputation/ethical/moral standards of nuclear scientists of Pakistan and the way Pak stole nuclear technology (from Netherlands), acquired from China (A Q Khan was lectured in China; so not indigenous) and above all its irresponsible distribution of nuclear material to N. Korea and Libya (like fire crackers). BTW these are not allegations—these are documented facts. The China-Pak-N Korea-Libya-Algeria-S Arabia nexus is well known—read neutral analysis. If you forget for a moment that Pakistan is a nation, seems like all I sad above is done by some terrorists—-alas it is a nation. Being a nuclear nation is great but the way it is achieved is also as important. Indian technology is indigenous and India has acted responsibly and is thus well respected.
Currently Pakistan is viewed as the world’s largest industry of manufacturing terrorists—a highly indigenous program (Gordon Brown is scared since 75% of the leads in terrorism originate from Pakistan). No wonder everyone is worried right now and giving money to tackle this—BUT WHER IS THE MONEY GOING; COUNTERPRODUCTIVE. See this http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/librar y/report/2008/wmd-prolif-terror-commissi on2-02.htm a US report on WMD including.a special feature “Pakistan: The Intersection of Nuclear Weapons and Terrorism” But we got to be fair to say that innocents Pakistanis are victimized by state policies of using terrorism as policy (again proven). minimum a common Pakistani can realize is that pakistan as a state has been destructive for all. Terrorism as policy is not working anyomore and has come a full circle to hurt pakistan itself.

B

]]>
By: Al Baloushi http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2009/01/24/obamas-south-asian-envoy-and-the-kashmir-conundrum/comment-page-2/#comment-11520 Thu, 29 Jan 2009 06:29:43 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=1681#comment-11520 Yes chirkut, for maintaining one’s prestige and security some time you have to eat leaves. As per World Bank statistic India’s percapita income $840 & Pakistan is having $820 is there any major diffenrce. Though Indian making lots of hue and cry about their developments and modernization still they were not able to take on 10 aliens who made life paralized in Bombay. Also Indian navy is claiming capturing Somali pirates thousand miles away from their border, but….you understand what I mean.

]]>
By: chirkut http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2009/01/24/obamas-south-asian-envoy-and-the-kashmir-conundrum/comment-page-2/#comment-11517 Thu, 29 Jan 2009 05:30:29 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=1681#comment-11517 @Mastram
Also i think it was ZA bhutto who said Pakistanis will eat grass but will develop nuclear weapon.
How prohphetic i must say..
Now Pakistan is just doing both of it.

]]>
By: chirkut http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2009/01/24/obamas-south-asian-envoy-and-the-kashmir-conundrum/comment-page-2/#comment-11516 Thu, 29 Jan 2009 05:20:08 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=1681#comment-11516 @ MAstram
What made you think India sas less nuclear arsenal than Pakistan? Is it your media or your mulla??
Most of the Weapon grade plutonium is generated in Nuclear reactors. India has 14 and Pakistan has just 3 (Khushab chashma and kahuta). Does these numbers indicate anything to you?

Indians migrate to different countries (Not just US/UK but also to Kenya South Africa etc) because india is more globalized country. And Immigrant Indians are respected worldwide because of they are law abiding and progress oriented. That is why Indian diaspora in US is the most successful immigrant community while Pakis diaspora in UK is known for Bradford riots and London Bombings.

]]>
By: Al Baloushi http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2009/01/24/obamas-south-asian-envoy-and-the-kashmir-conundrum/comment-page-2/#comment-11514 Thu, 29 Jan 2009 04:58:48 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=1681#comment-11514 Dear Blogger/Rupen, you both are right in defending your cause because seems you both are following the Nehru philosophy. One of you said Hindustan still there but do not see Mughlistan, now just see how many Mughlistan are around, Pakistani’s fought USSR and brought these countries on the World map i.e.Turkamanistan, Tajikistan, Ujbikistan, Kyrgistan, Kazikistan, Azerbaijan and if you include Afghanistan PAKISTAN, we are greater than what today’s pooer Hindustan. Another very important point since India is secular nation why are you calling it Hindustran? In our case we are not calling Mughilistan or Muslimistan to our country. Now about weak patient (Pakistan). My dear weak patient do not carry nuclear weapons in hundreds.

]]>