Comments on: Afghan supply routes face setbacks in Pakistan, Kyrgyzstan http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2009/02/03/afghan-supply-routes-face-setbacks-in-pakistan-kyrgystan/ Perspectives on Pakistan Thu, 01 Oct 2015 19:31:05 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.5 By: Mauryan http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2009/02/03/afghan-supply-routes-face-setbacks-in-pakistan-kyrgystan/comment-page-2/#comment-13040 Thu, 19 Feb 2009 22:38:14 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=1804#comment-13040 Russia should come forward to help US and its allies to settle the matter in this region. They are the ones who started it all in 1978 and it has come this far. Russia did suffer in Chechnya and Dagestan recently. These issues will erupt again. This needs to be put to bed. Countries like Kyrgystan have to be told either they are with us in the war on terror or they are against us. This is a crucial period in the war on terror. India should allow US to operate from the Kashmir under its control. That place is very close to Afghanistan as well. With US operating from inside Indian controlled Kashmir, India can let the American see for themselves on what exactly going on and all the claims of rapes, pillage, plunder by the Indian military that Pakistanis have been claiming can be checked by a different observer. In fact the US should set up its camps on both Indian and Pakistani sides of Kashmir. It will kill insurgency inside Kashmir and will help zero in on the Taliban from inside India as well as from Afghanistan. India is going to lose Kashmir otherwise.

]]>
By: Bangash Khan http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2009/02/03/afghan-supply-routes-face-setbacks-in-pakistan-kyrgystan/comment-page-2/#comment-12837 Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:34:47 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=1804#comment-12837 @Rajeev

You did not acknowledge that you were wrong in saying that liberals don’t rule Pakistan. You just jumped to another complaint.

Reading many news outlets about Pakistan, including Pakistani ones is not going to make you an expert on the country. Media is biased, sensationalist and suffers from groupthink.

]]>
By: rajeev http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2009/02/03/afghan-supply-routes-face-setbacks-in-pakistan-kyrgystan/comment-page-2/#comment-12493 Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:35:41 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=1804#comment-12493 “Liberals are ruling Pakistan. Mr Musharraf was a liberal, and the current Pakistan People’s Party’s is a liberal, left-wing party.
But how would Indians know any of this as their level of knowledge about Pakistan is close to nil ?””
– Posted by Bangash Khan

—Bangesh, in your post to Mitchell you say that article in Dawn is an opinion that could be wrong and does not mae Pakistan guility. So are you better than Dawn what you said above to me. We Indians enough of you and try to trust multiple sources of info, not just Indian media. In your Pakistan circles, isn’t it believed mullahs have influenced the Pakistani internal and external policies for a good reason they offer in many cases that they know about Sharia than the politicians. It is easier for Pakistan to control terrorists than to control hardcore religious Mullahs. This is the opinion of your own good journalists who want Pakistan progress and are not afraid to ask these questions, only that their views are rejected as opinions since you feel uncomfortable. I think you have forgotten LalMasjid siege so soon.

]]>
By: Bangash Khan http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2009/02/03/afghan-supply-routes-face-setbacks-in-pakistan-kyrgystan/comment-page-2/#comment-12487 Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:57:40 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=1804#comment-12487 @Mitchell

An opinion piece in Dawn does not make Pakistan guilty of everything, neither is the purpose of such pieces for them to be used as propaganda by hostile anti-Pakistan elements. An opinion piece can also be completely wrong, as it is true that Indian intelligence supports terrorists inside Pakistan, from Baloch groups to Pak-Taliban groups.

]]>
By: Bangash Khan http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2009/02/03/afghan-supply-routes-face-setbacks-in-pakistan-kyrgystan/comment-page-2/#comment-12486 Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:54:35 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=1804#comment-12486 @Rajeev

Liberals are ruling Pakistan. Mr Musharraf was a liberal, and the current Pakistan People’s Party’s is a liberal, left-wing party.

But how would Indians know any of this as their level of knowledge about Pakistan is close to nil ?

]]>
By: Anup http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2009/02/03/afghan-supply-routes-face-setbacks-in-pakistan-kyrgystan/comment-page-2/#comment-12474 Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:25:00 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=1804#comment-12474 Umair
“psycopath mentally ill”
—Huh? for what? using the net? is it proving to be counter-productive to pakistani’s? lol

“Next you will be flying on mars?”
—That’s advancement! not like you guys – committing suicide- hallucinating to end up in some perverted pleasure land – 72 virgins + 27 adolescent boys (sic)

]]>
By: rajeev http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2009/02/03/afghan-supply-routes-face-setbacks-in-pakistan-kyrgystan/comment-page-2/#comment-12472 Tue, 10 Feb 2009 08:25:09 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=1804#comment-12472 “””by having a caricatured view of Pakistan & blaming the whole nation, you are marginalizing the moderates & the liberals in Pakistani society”””
—Liberals do not rule Pakistan, hence the reason.

]]>
By: rajeev http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2009/02/03/afghan-supply-routes-face-setbacks-in-pakistan-kyrgystan/comment-page-2/#comment-12471 Tue, 10 Feb 2009 08:23:45 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=1804#comment-12471 “It was printed in Sri Lanka’s Daily Mirror magazine…hence the majority of the article was about Sri Lanka. But it did blame RAW for fanning unrest in Balochistan as well.”
– Posted by Qasim
—-Original article Was in Pakdaily. Qasim, are you still hanging on to those lines for life. Shake off all your fears (be altert though) and the fact is ISI has and is sponsoring a variety of terrorisms in India using a variety of approaches. India does not love all this. It is too big to be easily disturbed by terrorism. US and NATO believe that PAK is not dispensable yet; so sanctions not possible that can arm twist PAK to stop all that T-ism. war is not an easy solution since unstable Pak’s nuke movement is dangerous (even without firing due to T-ist issue). Covert operations by India can shake Pakistan so easily right now. Do you think India’ll sit and T-ist attacks.

]]>
By: Umair http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2009/02/03/afghan-supply-routes-face-setbacks-in-pakistan-kyrgystan/comment-page-2/#comment-12459 Tue, 10 Feb 2009 00:20:53 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=1804#comment-12459 Anup wrote:
“—Via internet from earth- In Hell, where you’ll belong…lol”

psycopath mentally ill Anup, keep going you are doing well. Next you will be flying on mars? huh

]]>
By: Anup http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2009/02/03/afghan-supply-routes-face-setbacks-in-pakistan-kyrgystan/comment-page-2/#comment-12450 Mon, 09 Feb 2009 19:49:31 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=1804#comment-12450 Umair
“where will run your smear campaign against Pakistan?”

—Via internet from earth- In Hell, where you’ll belong…lol

]]>