Comments on: More U.S. troops for Afghanistan http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2009/02/20/more-us-troops-for-afghanistan/ Perspectives on Pakistan Thu, 01 Oct 2015 19:31:05 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.5 By: azaddp http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2009/02/20/more-us-troops-for-afghanistan/comment-page-2/#comment-13606 Sat, 28 Feb 2009 23:42:12 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=1971#comment-13606 Bangash Khan Amir ALi
FATIMA BHUTTO and MUKTAR MAIS
are Paks not Indians

They will be safer in India; you have wiped out all hindus and the tiny number living there are raped and abused on a daily basis, you want to talk about persecution go ask ask your women for a counselling

http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-s tories/2009-02-11/does-pakistan-have-no- shame/2/

]]>
By: Bangash Khan http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2009/02/20/more-us-troops-for-afghanistan/comment-page-2/#comment-13530 Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:15:41 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=1971#comment-13530 @Tushar

We bring up Kashmir when the Indian posters on this blog attack Pakistan and Islam as a whole, while ignoring the actual blog post.

We also bring up Kashmir because the Kashmiris have suffered terribly at the hands of the Indian army for 60 years.

@bulltetfish

What does the Oscars have to do with politics ? or even geopolitics for the matter?

Its because of such looney comments that posters like Ali are needed, to bring some wayward Indian posters in line.

]]>
By: Tushar http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2009/02/20/more-us-troops-for-afghanistan/comment-page-2/#comment-13459 Thu, 26 Feb 2009 05:22:44 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=1971#comment-13459 Ali, Khan- This blog is about Afghanistan. I hope you guys have understood. I fail to understand why is there so much of Kashmir obsession with the Pakistanis. No matter what the topic is, they have to talk about it.

Guys… please understand that there is more to the world than Kashmir… Currently parts (large chunks) of your country are under Taliban control and they are within a striking distance from Islamabad.

]]>
By: bulletfish http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2009/02/20/more-us-troops-for-afghanistan/comment-page-2/#comment-13364 Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:46:13 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=1971#comment-13364 Khan,
We know very well where our place in the world is. If 2 INDIANS can win 3 Oscars between them, that at least is a great achievement on the world stage.

YOU have got the Taliban crawling over your SOVEREIGN territory and soon YOUR PLACE will be 1000 years back! Its a pity because IF they do reach you will they allow you internet to continue your blogging?

As you stated: there is some peace in Swat. Why settle for some when you need total peace.

ASK NOT WHAT YOUR COUNTRY CAN DO FOR YOU, BUT WHAT YOU CAN DO FOR YOUR COUNTRY.
(JFK)

]]>
By: Bangash Khan http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2009/02/20/more-us-troops-for-afghanistan/comment-page-2/#comment-13358 Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:52:49 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=1971#comment-13358 There is some peace in Swat, indeed that makes Indians angry. A pity there is no peace in Kashmir for last 60 years.

Ali, thanks for putting these Indian posters in their place.

]]>
By: Omniscient http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2009/02/20/more-us-troops-for-afghanistan/comment-page-2/#comment-13337 Tue, 24 Feb 2009 05:16:03 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=1971#comment-13337 Khan, Ali other abusers
U heard the moderator!! now start using your grey cells and come up with some decent arguments if u have any. Dont vomit the crap you learn in madarsas over here, keep that to brainwash your kids.

]]>
By: bulletfish http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2009/02/20/more-us-troops-for-afghanistan/comment-page-2/#comment-13323 Mon, 23 Feb 2009 20:23:38 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=1971#comment-13323 Khan,

Why don’t you and Ali get a room together because YOU Pakis have already bent over obediently for the Taliban. Whatever happened to Hum hai Pakistani to hum jeete geh? Or is that reserved for cricket?

SUCK ON THIS:

Indian wins 3 Oscars.
Pakistan loses 1 Swat.

Why the HELL cannot your so-called PURE country contribute something meaningful to the world?

YOU ARE AN EMBARASSMENT TO THE WORLD AND AN INSULT TO ISLAM.

]]>
By: Bangash Khan http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2009/02/20/more-us-troops-for-afghanistan/comment-page-2/#comment-13320 Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:37:25 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=1971#comment-13320 Good job Ali! You showed that Indians can dish out but they can’t take it.

]]>
By: Aamir Al http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2009/02/20/more-us-troops-for-afghanistan/comment-page-2/#comment-13317 Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:24:06 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=1971#comment-13317 Indian posters taunt Pakistanis, describe Pakistan as cancer, attack Islam and go on wild tangents that have nothing to do with the blog posting, and yet it is Pakistanis who are the problem ?

]]>
By: Sanjeev Miglani http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2009/02/20/more-us-troops-for-afghanistan/comment-page-2/#comment-13296 Mon, 23 Feb 2009 13:30:58 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=1971#comment-13296 A reader has objected to some comments posted on this blog as offensive in nature. While not getting into the merits of the case, we want to be absolutely clear that personal attacks or criticising another faith are unacceptable. It is also completely unnecessary.

We are for an open debate, and we realise these are emotive issues, but it must remain within the boundaries of civil discourse.

We will be looking at comments closely, and anything that breaches the basic norms of propriety will not be published.

We look forward to your cooperation and a healthy and productive debate.

]]>