<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More U.S. troops for Afghanistan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2009/02/20/more-us-troops-for-afghanistan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2009/02/20/more-us-troops-for-afghanistan/</link>
	<description>Perspectives on Pakistan</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Apr 2013 16:19:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: azaddp</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2009/02/20/more-us-troops-for-afghanistan/comment-page-2/#comment-13606</link>
		<dc:creator>azaddp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 23:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=1971#comment-13606</guid>
		<description>Bangash Khan Amir  ALi
FATIMA BHUTTO and MUKTAR MAIS 
are Paks not Indians



They will be safer in India; you have wiped out all hindus and the tiny number living there are raped and abused on a daily basis, you want to talk about persecution go ask ask your women for a counselling

http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-02-11/does-pakistan-have-no-shame/2/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bangash Khan Amir  ALi<br />
FATIMA BHUTTO and MUKTAR MAIS<br />
are Paks not Indians</p>
<p>They will be safer in India; you have wiped out all hindus and the tiny number living there are raped and abused on a daily basis, you want to talk about persecution go ask ask your women for a counselling</p>
<p><a href='http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-02-11/does-pakistan-have-no-shame/2/'>http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-s tories/2009-02-11/does-pakistan-have-no- shame/2/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bangash Khan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2009/02/20/more-us-troops-for-afghanistan/comment-page-2/#comment-13530</link>
		<dc:creator>Bangash Khan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=1971#comment-13530</guid>
		<description>@Tushar

We bring up Kashmir when the Indian posters on this blog attack Pakistan and Islam as a whole, while ignoring the actual blog post.

We also bring up Kashmir because the Kashmiris have suffered terribly at the hands of the Indian army for 60 years.

@bulltetfish

What does the Oscars have to do with politics ? or even geopolitics for the matter? 

Its because of such looney comments that posters like Ali are needed, to bring some wayward Indian posters in line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tushar</p>
<p>We bring up Kashmir when the Indian posters on this blog attack Pakistan and Islam as a whole, while ignoring the actual blog post.</p>
<p>We also bring up Kashmir because the Kashmiris have suffered terribly at the hands of the Indian army for 60 years.</p>
<p>@bulltetfish</p>
<p>What does the Oscars have to do with politics ? or even geopolitics for the matter? </p>
<p>Its because of such looney comments that posters like Ali are needed, to bring some wayward Indian posters in line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tushar</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2009/02/20/more-us-troops-for-afghanistan/comment-page-2/#comment-13459</link>
		<dc:creator>Tushar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 05:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=1971#comment-13459</guid>
		<description>Ali, Khan- This blog is about Afghanistan. I hope you guys have understood. I fail to understand why is there so much of Kashmir obsession with the Pakistanis. No matter what the topic is, they have to talk about it.  

Guys... please understand that there is more to the world than Kashmir... Currently parts (large chunks) of your country are under Taliban control and they are within a striking distance from Islamabad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ali, Khan- This blog is about Afghanistan. I hope you guys have understood. I fail to understand why is there so much of Kashmir obsession with the Pakistanis. No matter what the topic is, they have to talk about it.  </p>
<p>Guys&#8230; please understand that there is more to the world than Kashmir&#8230; Currently parts (large chunks) of your country are under Taliban control and they are within a striking distance from Islamabad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bulletfish</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2009/02/20/more-us-troops-for-afghanistan/comment-page-2/#comment-13364</link>
		<dc:creator>bulletfish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=1971#comment-13364</guid>
		<description>Khan,
We know very well where our place in the world is. If 2 INDIANS can win 3 Oscars between them, that at least is a great achievement on the world stage.

YOU have got the Taliban crawling over your SOVEREIGN territory and soon YOUR PLACE will be 1000 years back! Its a pity because IF they do reach you will they allow you internet to continue your blogging?

As you stated: there is some peace in Swat. Why settle for some when you need total peace.

ASK NOT WHAT YOUR COUNTRY CAN DO FOR YOU, BUT WHAT YOU CAN DO FOR YOUR COUNTRY. 
(JFK)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Khan,<br />
We know very well where our place in the world is. If 2 INDIANS can win 3 Oscars between them, that at least is a great achievement on the world stage.</p>
<p>YOU have got the Taliban crawling over your SOVEREIGN territory and soon YOUR PLACE will be 1000 years back! Its a pity because IF they do reach you will they allow you internet to continue your blogging?</p>
<p>As you stated: there is some peace in Swat. Why settle for some when you need total peace.</p>
<p>ASK NOT WHAT YOUR COUNTRY CAN DO FOR YOU, BUT WHAT YOU CAN DO FOR YOUR COUNTRY.<br />
(JFK)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bangash Khan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2009/02/20/more-us-troops-for-afghanistan/comment-page-2/#comment-13358</link>
		<dc:creator>Bangash Khan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=1971#comment-13358</guid>
		<description>There is some peace in Swat, indeed that makes Indians angry. A pity there is no peace in Kashmir for last 60 years. 

Ali, thanks for putting these Indian posters in their place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is some peace in Swat, indeed that makes Indians angry. A pity there is no peace in Kashmir for last 60 years. </p>
<p>Ali, thanks for putting these Indian posters in their place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Omniscient</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2009/02/20/more-us-troops-for-afghanistan/comment-page-2/#comment-13337</link>
		<dc:creator>Omniscient</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 05:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=1971#comment-13337</guid>
		<description>Khan, Ali other abusers 
U heard the moderator!! now start using your grey cells and come up with some decent arguments if u have any. Dont vomit the crap you learn in madarsas over here, keep that to brainwash your kids.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Khan, Ali other abusers<br />
U heard the moderator!! now start using your grey cells and come up with some decent arguments if u have any. Dont vomit the crap you learn in madarsas over here, keep that to brainwash your kids.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bulletfish</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2009/02/20/more-us-troops-for-afghanistan/comment-page-2/#comment-13323</link>
		<dc:creator>bulletfish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 20:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=1971#comment-13323</guid>
		<description>Khan,

Why don&#039;t you and Ali get a room together because YOU Pakis have already bent over obediently for the Taliban. Whatever happened to Hum hai Pakistani to hum jeete geh? Or is that reserved for cricket?

SUCK ON THIS:

Indian wins 3 Oscars.
Pakistan loses 1 Swat.

Why the HELL cannot your so-called PURE country contribute something meaningful to the world?

YOU ARE AN EMBARASSMENT TO THE WORLD AND AN INSULT TO ISLAM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Khan,</p>
<p>Why don&#8217;t you and Ali get a room together because YOU Pakis have already bent over obediently for the Taliban. Whatever happened to Hum hai Pakistani to hum jeete geh? Or is that reserved for cricket?</p>
<p>SUCK ON THIS:</p>
<p>Indian wins 3 Oscars.<br />
Pakistan loses 1 Swat.</p>
<p>Why the HELL cannot your so-called PURE country contribute something meaningful to the world?</p>
<p>YOU ARE AN EMBARASSMENT TO THE WORLD AND AN INSULT TO ISLAM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bangash Khan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2009/02/20/more-us-troops-for-afghanistan/comment-page-2/#comment-13320</link>
		<dc:creator>Bangash Khan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=1971#comment-13320</guid>
		<description>Good job Ali! You showed that Indians can dish out but they can&#039;t take it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good job Ali! You showed that Indians can dish out but they can&#8217;t take it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aamir Al</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2009/02/20/more-us-troops-for-afghanistan/comment-page-2/#comment-13317</link>
		<dc:creator>Aamir Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=1971#comment-13317</guid>
		<description>Indian posters taunt Pakistanis, describe Pakistan as cancer, attack Islam and go on wild tangents that have nothing to do with the blog posting, and yet it is Pakistanis who are the problem ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indian posters taunt Pakistanis, describe Pakistan as cancer, attack Islam and go on wild tangents that have nothing to do with the blog posting, and yet it is Pakistanis who are the problem ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sanjeev Miglani</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2009/02/20/more-us-troops-for-afghanistan/comment-page-2/#comment-13296</link>
		<dc:creator>Sanjeev Miglani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 13:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=1971#comment-13296</guid>
		<description>A reader has objected to some comments posted on this blog as offensive in nature. While not getting into the merits of the case, we want to be absolutely clear that personal attacks or criticising another faith are unacceptable. It is also completely unnecessary. 

We are for an open debate, and we realise these are emotive issues, but it must remain within the boundaries of civil discourse.

We will be looking at comments closely, and anything that breaches the basic norms of propriety will not be published.

We look forward to your cooperation and a healthy and productive debate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A reader has objected to some comments posted on this blog as offensive in nature. While not getting into the merits of the case, we want to be absolutely clear that personal attacks or criticising another faith are unacceptable. It is also completely unnecessary. </p>
<p>We are for an open debate, and we realise these are emotive issues, but it must remain within the boundaries of civil discourse.</p>
<p>We will be looking at comments closely, and anything that breaches the basic norms of propriety will not be published.</p>
<p>We look forward to your cooperation and a healthy and productive debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
