Reuters Blogs

Pakistan: Now or Never?

Perspectives on Pakistan

19:29 February 25th, 2009

Americans vote for Afghan troop surge, but Afghans differ

Posted by: Sanjeev Miglani
Tags: Pakistan: Now or Never, , , , ,

An overwhelming majority of Americans support President Barack Obama’s decision to deploy an additional 17,000 troops to Afghanistan, according to a Gallup poll this week. It said 65 percent approved the measure, with support among Republicans hitting 75 percent, making it one of the rare policy decisions where a president gets greater backing from those who identify with an opposing political party than his own.

And in a still greater boost for his young presidency, 77 percent of those who voted for the surge said they would also approve if  Obama decided to send another 13,000 troops to Afghanistan as many expect after a regional policy review.

What’s the reason for this support for American boots on the ground ? Is Afghanistan really the good war in a way that Iraq was not?

One clue could be found in another poll that Gallup did before the latest one. It showed that a majority of Americans believed that the war was going very or moderately badly for the United States in Afghanistan, continuing a trend that began in mid-2008. And fully 70 percent of those polled felt that the Taliban would re-take control if U.S. forces were withdrawn. So they likely view the decision to send more troops as unfortunate but necessary.

Another interesting finding that was that only 30 percent thought sending troops to Afghanistan was a mistake in contrast to the majority who consistently said from Octber 2008 that deployment in Iraq was a mistake.

 But what of the people of Afghanistan? How do they see the stepped up deployment of U.S. forces  and indeed their own future? The most recent poll that I could see was one released jointly by ABC News, BBC and German TV earlier this month and the divergence  between the American people and their Afghan brethren  half a world away is inescapable. Click here for a PDF.

While Afghans would broadly agree that things haven’t quite turned out the way they hoped with only 40 percent thinking the country was headed in the right direction from a high of 77 percent in 2005, many seem to have turned on America itself.

Only 47 percent of Afghans have  a favourable view of the United States, a sharp fall from the high of 83 percent in 2005 which in itself was unheard of in the Muslim world.  Only 37 percent said people in their area supported Western forces, and a quarter said attacks on U.S. or NATO/ISAF forces were justified.

Little surprise then, that only 18 percent of Afghans supported an increase in U.S. and or NATO troop levels in the country.  Far more, 44 percent, wanted the opposite, that is a reduction in Western forces that many blame for rising civilian casualties.

As the Washington Post put it, the troops that are coming in now will face not only a resurgent and well-armed Taliban insurgency, but an equally daunting foe: public opinion.  More foreign troops will exacerbate the problem, the paper reported, citing interviews with ordinary Afghans that seem to echo the findings of the survey.

So is there a clash of perceptions between the American and the Afghan people,  or is it a clash of interests?

(Reuters pictures of U.S. troops in a plane headed for Afghanistan and on the ground in eastern Afghanistan)

23 comments so far

@mauryan

well I guess its Pakistan good fortune that Mr Bush blew a trillion bucks in Iraq and postponed any “Operation Pakistani Freedom” forever! Weep Indians!

- Posted by Aamir Ali

its sounds like that you guyz just dont want to see pakistan as a country . when USA help israil that not wrong,when indin army kill ppl in kashmir that not wrong but when few bad ppl from pakitan do any thing bad you guyz talk about there shouldnt be any pakistan. what is india doing in kashmir what is that killing ppl that not terror . when israil army kill women and childern that no terror i just want to know what is that called. why not then any body look at it even they do look at it. They just close there eyes . why its like that ?

- Posted by Tahir

The first thing everyone has to worry about is the nuclear weapons in Pakistan. The 5 billion dollar aid and all future economic trade agreements must be tied to a controlled denuclearization. The audacity shown by Pakistani establishment in even standing up to the US comes from this false sense of security provided by their nuclear weapons and missiles. These weapons of mass destruction can only be handled by countries that have stability and responsibility. Pakistan has neither. With the disintegration of Pakistan a strong possibility today, the US and other world powers must meet and come up with a plan to remove all nuclear infrastructure from this country. That must be the highest priority. I am not saying this because I am an Indian. Pakistan does not need these weapons. India will never use its nuclear weapons against anyone as a first strike. India’s nuclear program is directed towards China. Both countries are comparable in size, population and compete economically. They are also regional powers. Pakistan should not compare itself with a big country like India and waste all its money and resources on achieving parity with India.

The US was so adamant about going into Iraq for WMDs. Yet I am surprised that they do not have a similar view towards a much more dangerous nation like Pakistan. I do not understand why they are still nice to them. Pakistan stage managed the Mumbai attacks and I am sure the CIA and FBI are fully aware of it. But they are only offering limited support to India and allowing Pakistan to get away with their act. It makes no sense.

- Posted by Mauryan

Post Your Comment

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word

House Rules:
  • We moderate all comments and will publish everything that advances the post directly or with relevant tangential information
  • We try not to publish comments that we think are offensive or appear to pass you off as another person, and we will be conservative if comments may be considered libelous information.