Reuters Blogs

Pakistan: Now or Never?

Perspectives on Pakistan

01:30 March 6th, 2009

Lahore conspiracy theories go beyond the boundary

Posted by: Simon Cameron Moore
Tags: India: A billion aspirations, Pakistan: Now or Never, , , , , , ,

Conspiracy theories have filled a void in Pakistan that opened up as soon as the dozen gunmen who attacked the visiting Sri Lankan cricket team made a leisurely getaway  without any apparent casualties after a 25 minute gun battle.

Since the attack on Tuesday, Pakistani authorities have yet to reveal where the investigation was going,  despite Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi saying “important  leads” had been established.

There has been finger pointing in the Pakistani media in various directions, but the sympathies of the indiviual reporter or media group have to be examined in every case. Only the conspiracy theorists have answers to who could have done it and why.
 
    WHO ARE THE SUSPECTS?
    Lashkar-e-Taiba, the Pakistani jihadi group blamed for the slaughter of nearly 170 people in Mumbai last November. There were some similiarities, but LeT hasn’t got any history of attacking inside Pakistan.

Maybe LeT fears the Pakistan government, having already arrested a handful of LeT members named in the Mumbai case, seriously aims to put it out of
business and wanted to send a warning, destabilise a Pakistani government it thinks is soft on India and Kashmir. Maybe it is worried the old  friends in Pakistani intelligence are abandoning them.

But the rationale for targetting Sri Lankan cricketers, in Lahore, a city where the LeT has moved easily in the past, is hard to see.

 Another Sunni militant group with far stronger ties to al Qaeda is Lashkar-e-Janghvi. Like LeT, LeJ is a Punjabi group.

But LeJ has provided footsoldiers for al Qaeda operations, and has been involved in spectacular attacks, most recently the  suicide truck boming of the Marriott hotel in Islamabad last September, which killed 55 people.

As the Daily Times notes, the involvement of LeJ, or another group in al Qaeda’s thrall makes sense on some levels. But the question of why the Sri  Lankans were targeted is hard to square unless the answer is that it could have been anybody. The attack has certainly achieved an  al Qaeda objective in terms of ruining Pakistan’s international image and undermining faith in the government.

 The Pakistani Taliban also have ties to al Qaeda and have been blamed for the assassination of former prime minister  Benazir Bhutto, though there’s a surfeit of conspiracy theories around her slaying too.

Then there is the Indian factor. Attitudes towards India in Pakistan are polarised, with ordinary people in many parts of the country ready to make friends, but the media in both countries quickly turn on each other.

There have been three wars since Pakistan’s formation out of  the partition of India in 1947, and a peace process was frozen in the aftermath of the Mumbai attacks.

A lot of rightists, people associated with the security apparatus and retired, but still influential generals would readily blame Indian intelligence.

 One junior minister from President Zardari’s party actually said there was evidence of Indian involvement before the government disowned his comments by saying it had no information so far.

There have been other accusations and allusions in the media to the Indian involvement.  A story in The News reported a day  after the attack the Punjab government had been warned that Indian intelligence was planning to hit the Sri Lankans in Lahore, and scanned copies of the purported CID report have been circulated via e-mail.

 Former Pakistani spy chief and Islamist sympathiser Hamid Gul has speculated that Indian intelligence could have helped the Tamil Tigers launch the attack. But remember Gul has said that both the 9/11  attacks in the United States and the November 26 raid on India could have been “inside jobs”. Nonsense it may be, but Gul is seen as very credible in Islamist, rightist quarters of Pakistan.

 So let’s look at his theory. In August, 2006, a bomb attack on Pakistan’s High Commissioner, Bashir Wali,  in Colombo killed four Sri Lankan soldiers. Wali, a former intelligence officer, is convinced India put the Tamil Tigers up to the attack, as a warning to Pakistan to stop meddling in Sri Lanka, according to a report in the News.
 
The Tigers haven’t targeted Sri Lankans abroad before, but they certainly have a motive — they’re on the point of defeat in northern Sri Lanka.

But why would Indian intelligence give them a hand? India is discomfited by the friendship between Pakistan and Sri Lanka. Pakistan provides military training and arms to Sri Lanka.

 Indian involvement, if it was discovered, in the attack on Sri Lankan cricket team would presumbably drive Pakistan and Sri Lanka closer together. New Delhi shouldn’t want to risk that.

 Pakistan and India have a history of seeking revenge, tit-for-tat, actions, and as yet the books aren’t balanced for Mumbai . Some Indo-phobes suggest the Lahore attack was payback by an Indian intelligence agency , and many ordinary people find that easy to believe.

 If that was the case why hit the Sri Lankans? Why target a cricket team? People shouldn’t forget that if anyone loves cricket more than a Pakistani or a Sri Lankans it is an Indian.

 The next time the attack would be on Indian cricketers. Would
India’s agency, the Research & Analysis Wing, want to risk that? I don’t think so. They haven’t been playing that badly.

89 comments so far

@Bloody Indians taunt and insult Pakistanis as a nation, then complain when they get a reply in the same coin.
- Posted by Aamir Ali

–Meet my dear friend peaceful friend Aamir Ali from peaceful Pakistan! spitting honey!!!

- Posted by rajeev

Bloody Indians taunt and insult Pakistanis as a nation, then complain when they get a reply in the same coin.

- Posted by Aamir Ali

@Moral of the story, Madrasas in pakistan do not preach hatred/terrorism.
- Posted by Umair

–Umair: Can you say that for each Madrasa in Pakistan? Understandably, in principal Masdrasa can not be a place to preach hatred/fundmentalism. I can put my money that some Madrasas are teaching fundamentalism/hate (not terrorism per se) for a simple reason of “Catch them young” ideology.

Don;t you agree with
me? please be honest in your reply. A Madrasa in Ismlamabad and FATA or SWAT Will not be the same.

http://www.asianews.it/index.php?l=en&ar t=4071

http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Inside+a+M adrasa:+U.S.+kids+talk+about+their+daily +lives+at+an…-a0154756197

- Posted by rajeev

bulletfish
sometimes Anup has resorted to the worst kind of comments, look below what he states regarding Madrasas. When I was young my father sent me to Madrasa and I learned the Quran in the Mosque, I further went on to earn an undergraduate degree in Business.

Moral of the story, Madrasas in pakistan do not preach hatred/terrorism.

- Posted by Umair

Umair,
Do not get too hot headed with anup and PLEASE do not retort with insults like ’shut you stupid Indian’. I know you can respond with a more tolerant and civilized reply.

What anup has stated is partially correct. Not every, but MOST Pakistanis on these blogs (06 Mar - 11 Mar) post the same old rehtorical stories:

Indian slumdogs.
Pak Army - best in world.
Pakistan is peaceful country.
Pak: we have nukes.
Lahore attacks: its India and RAW.

I too have posted repeat responses, but in my defence I supply supportive information.

I name Peace and Aamar Ali because these 2 seem to post the same comments. I know that Peace has copy and pasted the same comment on 2-3 blogs with nothing to support their theories.

- Posted by bulletfish

Let us think for a while that may be India was involved in the Lahore attack, for the sake of debate.
Then i must say that the Pakistan police and security forces are very pro-India.
The attack lasted for 30 to 35 minutes and not much shot was fired at the trigger happy (Indian!?!?) terrorists. This was not the view of an obnoxious Indian but of an attacked Srilankan Cricketer.
A Pakistani news channel (GeoTV) showed a CCTV footage where two terrorists were fleeing the shootout spot by a motorbike with their AK47, and a police car went by them. Surprisingly they didn’t do anything, no attempt to shoot or even stopping. They must have been true patriotic Indians to let the ‘Indian’ Terrorists get away like that. The only thing missing was the “MERA BHARAT MAHAN”(My India Is Great) sticker from that Lahore Police car.
As for the other terrorists who took different routes of escape, found their way a little too clear. In fact may be they looked a little disappointed to see no one were there to congratulate them on their fine job.
For a area (Liberty Chouk) that was supposed to be under presidential security (because of the cricket team passing by) was a little too unsecured for comfort.
Who knows, may be India replaced all the guarding police men of Liberty Chouk with the finest from Mumbai, with compliments.
But actually it was a sad day for the properly educated and cricket loving people of Pakistan. The bottom line is all the twelve terrorists got away without a scratch, unlike Mumbai where each one of them were killed and even got one arrested, the infamous Ajmal Amir Kasav, the Pakistani who allegedly does not have a country.

- Posted by tridibearth

Anup shut you stupid Indian.

- Posted by Umair

Irfan

—How come every paki has exactly the same comments to make- are you’ll given these hand-outs at the madrassa that you’ll religiously attend?

- Posted by anup

bulletfish

Dont blame Amir and Peace.
When there is a complete breakdown of govt machinery and when people loose faith in administration. it is then in their helplessness people resort to conspiracy theory and rumors.
Amir and Peace are just symptoms of a much wider mess we call Pakistan,alas, next to our door.

- Posted by chirkut

Post Your Comment

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word

House Rules:
  • We moderate all comments and will publish everything that advances the post directly or with relevant tangential information
  • We try not to publish comments that we think are offensive or appear to pass you off as another person, and we will be conservative if comments may be considered libelous information.