Reuters Blogs

Pakistan: Now or Never?

Perspectives on Pakistan

10:10 October 26th, 2009

Fear drives conspiracy of silence in Pakistan

Posted by: zeeshan.haider
Tags: Pakistan: Now or Never, , , ,

Many Pakistanis and their leaders may hate the Taliban, but few dare speak openly against them for fear of reprisals from the hardline Islamist group.

The militants have carried out four attacks and killed at least a dozen people since the army launched an assault on their South Waziristan stronghold, while more than 150 people were killed in a deadly spree preceding the offensive - including a brazen raid on army headquarters in Rawalpindi.

Yet despite the attacks, few Pakistanis are prepared to come forward and bear witness against the militants.

While Naveed Haider was not afraid to give his version of events after witnessing the drive-by shooting of an army brigadier in the capital, he said he understood why others were more relectuant.

“They are scared,” he said pointing to a dozen people standing around him. “The shooting took place in front of all these people, but no one will speak because they are fightened.”

“What can we do?” a man in the crowd responded. “We are poor people. How can we speak?”

The apparent fear is not confined to ordinary people and seems even to have struck the country’s leaders — many who don’t move without a heavy bodyguard.

Prime Minister Yusuf Raza Gilani invited political leaders for a briefing with the army chief before the South Waziristan offensive,  but former prime minister Nawaz Sharif, the main opposition leader, and Maulana Fazl-ur-Rehman, an Islamist ally of the government, declined to attend.

“Nawaz falls ill, Maulana flies off, both avoid Taliban fury,” The News said.

Though Sharif was represented by his brother Shahbaz, chief minister of central Punjab province, the newspaper quoted unidentified “knowledegable sources” as saying that Sharif opted out because he didn’t want to be viewed as supporting the offensive “at a time when the Taliban had already started vengeful strikes in different parts of the country”.

Underlining security concerns, Shahbaz is seeking the postponement of a Punjab by-election due early next month on the grounds that the family faced threats from the militants.

Rehman, head of Jamiat-e-ulema-e-Islam, the country’s largest Islamic political party which draws much of its support from the northwest where most of the militants operate, also missed the government’s briefing on the offensive, the newspaper said. He has received threats from the militants in the past.

Some analysts say Sharif’s ambivalence might be linked to his political rivalry with President Asif Ali Zardari who has seen his popularity plunge, but local media urged a stance against extremism.

“At this time of great danger, we must also ask: what else will shake leaders such as Nawaz Sharif, who are still on the fence, to take a firm stand against militants and support the effort to subdue them?” Dawn asked in an editorial entitled “The evil in our midst”.

Karachi resident Quratulain Shafi, in a letter published in the Daily Times, called on politicians to bury their differences in the face of mounting problems faced by the country. “Stick to your word,” he said.

“We need both major political parties … to work together and with an eye on Pakistan’s interests, rather than their own, if the country is to succeed in defeating the current challenges.”

(Photos: Police in Lahore, and former prime minister Nawaz Sharif)

63 comments so far

people in pakistan should know that it has no enemies.there are some ofcourse who are working feverishly and are prepared to pay billions in order to deprive them from their nuclear arsenal and there are those who would do everything to support pakistan military confront its own people.peace in this region will benefit all in the world. the outside powers should therefore stop meddling in pakistan affairs as long as their territory is not being used to attack others.pakistan leaders should stop shooting in their own feet.

- Posted by rex minor

@Karzai has been given enough time to prove his competence, but US is fed up with him now. That is ground reality, Pakistan too has had enough with him. He is seen as someone who is working against Pakistan’s interests.
-Umair

–Afghanistan is a separate country and leave them alone. Karzai is not out there to please Pakistanis. Remember you ask India the same thing.

BTW give me one good reason–really–why would an Afghan–Pashthun or non-Pashtun love Pakistan knowing very well that Pakistan created Afghan Taliban that chopped limbs and severed heads of Afghans. No wonder all Afghans hate Pakistan.

ISI was alway unhappy with Karzai since he denied ISI/Taliban offer to represent Taliban govt internationally. It was Taliban/ISI that killed Karzai’s father. Just before 9/11, Karzai was given notice to leave the region. But then 9/11 happened and the whole thing changed. Americans took time to appreciate him from the beginning –they had no clue who he is.

This whole anti-Karzai propaganda is beginning of another pre-9/11 period for Afghanistan.
Brace Afghan bros

- Posted by rajeev

Mortal:
“please spare us your concern for the ‘corruption’& your ‘Pashtun brothers’ in Afghanistan. They are nothing but crocodile tears.”

-Mortal first see below:
HIGHLY TOUTED, BUT MISGUIDED IDEAS ABOUT AFGHANISTAN
http://worldblog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2 009/10/30/2114317.aspx
“4) Sending more troops for counter-insurgency and more civilian experts for nation-building is a waste of time and resources if there’s no national afghan leader in place.?

This may seem like a solid point, but think again. In reality, there has never been a tradition of strong central government in Afghanistan.

When I spoke to tribal elders in Helmand province just before the Aug. 20 elections, many told me they had never even seen a politician from Kabul before. In Afghanistan, politics are truly local. District and provincial councilmen are the powerbrokers whose faces matter to most Afghans, not President Hamid Karzai or his rival candidate in the run-off elections Abdullah Abdullah.

U.S. military and aid officials certainly get that. Since 2006, they’ve directly invested millions of dollars in discretionary funds into local programs, like alternative farming or the opening of schools and clinics, all on the village level, thus circumventing the corruption-tainted government. Their logic? Seven years of failed top-down reconstruction has turned Afghanistan into one of the donor world’s deepest money pits.

So, while the West rightly hopes for a legitimate Afghan leader back in Kabul, some local programs are making a difference on the ground. It may be surprising, but progress is possible without a presidential fiat…or even a president.”

Mortal, Karzai has been given enough time to prove his competence, but US is fed up with him now. That is ground reality, Pakistan too has had enough with him. He is seen as someone who is working against Pakistan’s interests. No one is shedding croc tears, Pakistanis have a great affect on their lives due to situation in Afghanistan and our tribal areas. If Karzai cannot correct his mistakes, time to show him the door. The real structure of Afghanistan is like that, its a tribal based society. My tribe is my network of support where my loyalty lies if I am an Afghan. The President in Kabul doesnt matter to those living in far villages.

- Posted by Umair

Post Your Comment

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word

House Rules:
  • We moderate all comments and will publish everything that advances the post directly or with relevant tangential information
  • We try not to publish comments that we think are offensive or appear to pass you off as another person, and we will be conservative if comments may be considered libelous information.