Comments on: India and Pakistan on the U.S. see-saw Perspectives on Pakistan Thu, 01 Oct 2015 19:31:05 +0000 hourly 1 By: Dorthea Sicinski Sun, 31 Oct 2010 18:11:15 +0000 This site seems to recieve a large ammount of visitors. How do you advertise it? It gives a nice unique spin on things. I guess having something useful or substantial to post about is the most important thing.

By: redmax Sat, 05 Jun 2010 07:35:12 +0000 @daraindia

Can India produce the legal document that verifies signing of accession of kashmir to India by Hari Singh? In either case, you must retract the claim.

“….Hari Singh panicked asked for Indian help which was refused as he was not part of India. It was then that he signed the accession to India.”

By: RajeevK Mon, 05 Apr 2010 19:09:37 +0000 @DaraIndia

Same here pal. Can’t imagine how the old ones put up with all those hindus
Posted by jb2010

—So that explains the drop in Hindu population in pakistan!!!

By: RajeevK Mon, 05 Apr 2010 19:05:57 +0000 @When the Punjab sikh population was fighting the Indian forces.

—get some cold shower or dip your head somewhere. There are genuine sikhs on this blog. I am sure they would have sided with you if it was “Punjab sikh population” (LMAO..) was fighting the Indian forces.

By: RajeevK Mon, 05 Apr 2010 18:56:26 +0000 @American ambassador can hardly enter the GHQ in Rawalpindi much less jump in a C-130 for a ride with Gen. Kayani.
Posted by Umairpk

–May be he can sub-contract TTP. They are good at it.

By: RajeevK Mon, 05 Apr 2010 18:53:18 +0000 @Any one still arguing a master-slave relationship between Pakistan and US?
Posted by Umairpk

—Very much.

By: RajeevK Mon, 05 Apr 2010 18:50:54 +0000 @Soon after the 9-11 attacks, corps commanders meeting took place in GHQ Rawalpindi. Some of the corps commanders had told then Army chief not to support the US impending attack in Afghanistan, that same story of Soviet occupation will be repeated. Pakistan will give it sweat and blood in return suffer. Still Pakistan supported the US at a huge cost.”

—-Do you know the reason why few corps commanders who were saying firm NO to allying with the USA on WOT finally agreed with him. Mushy told them if Pakistan will not go for it, India will. That did it. lol…The brand India sells well in Pakistan.

Just a bit of detail for you.

By: RajeevK Mon, 05 Apr 2010 13:51:04 +0000 jb2010:
@@I stand corrected there are 107 Indian consulates (terror networks) in Afghanistan. an-consulates-in-afghanistan-spreading-t error-to-pakistan/

–Is it not a case of a liar quoting another liar? Moin is a professional one….Is that your limit of fact checking?

India for years have been formenting terror in sri lanka, Nepal and Bangladesh. Indians live their pipe dream of competing with china and have sold the idea to west that they can contain china. Maybe the Indians have fogotton the 63 war!
Posted by jb2010 | Report as abusive

By: Mortal1 Wed, 31 Mar 2010 18:36:43 +0000 Bob Andersen,

The very basis of your argument “The land was divided based on religion” is erroneous. Pakistan was formed on a religious basis & ideology, not India. India never agreed to be divided on religious grounds because if that were the case, it’s 12% Muslim population (at the time of partition) would’ve been asked to leave or forced to leave just as the minorities in Pakistan were. Today, India’s minorities constitute app. 21% (2002 figures) of it’s population out of which 15% are muslims.

I won’t get into Kashmir’s history since others have already done so.

By: manishindia Wed, 31 Mar 2010 13:54:18 +0000 Myra,

In this power struggle, poor and innocent Afghans have become victim . In their bid to early exit from Afghanistan, US is willing to go to any length even willing to consider power sharing deal with talibans, US is also ready to work out deal with Pakistan at the cost of Afghans with full knowledge of Pak role in post Soviet Afghanistan .