<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Taliban names removed from U.N. list &#8211; how times have changed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2010/07/31/taliban-names-removed-from-u-n-list-how-times-have-changed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2010/07/31/taliban-names-removed-from-u-n-list-how-times-have-changed/</link>
	<description>Perspectives on Pakistan</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Apr 2013 16:19:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pakistan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2010/07/31/taliban-names-removed-from-u-n-list-how-times-have-changed/comment-page-2/#comment-32157</link>
		<dc:creator>pakistan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 10:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=5871#comment-32157</guid>
		<description>The rats have started leaving the sinking ship. A good news, but be careful the USA military is still there in force most probably to find a place in the neighbouring country.
Rex Minor</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rats have started leaving the sinking ship. A good news, but be careful the USA military is still there in force most probably to find a place in the neighbouring country.<br />
Rex Minor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: breezinthru</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2010/07/31/taliban-names-removed-from-u-n-list-how-times-have-changed/comment-page-2/#comment-32073</link>
		<dc:creator>breezinthru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 14:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=5871#comment-32073</guid>
		<description>We should give money, weaponry and recognition to three or more Taliban leaders and just wait for them to destroy each other.  Simple, inexpensive, and effective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We should give money, weaponry and recognition to three or more Taliban leaders and just wait for them to destroy each other.  Simple, inexpensive, and effective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RAJEEVK1</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2010/07/31/taliban-names-removed-from-u-n-list-how-times-have-changed/comment-page-2/#comment-31881</link>
		<dc:creator>RAJEEVK1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 07:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=5871#comment-31881</guid>
		<description>@ he tried but hindus like you wanted a hindu-raj over an expansive territory conquered by muslims, inherited by the british.&quot;
--Posted by mirusmtupsha

----&quot;conquered&quot; invaded (ok, not raped!). This is what I have being saying. if Kashmir is given to Pakistan on a platter, your generations will also say the same that Pakistan conquered Kashmir. 

So mughals conquered and  Brits inherited? lol..what is your sensitivity abt NOT saying Brits kicked your ancestor&#039;s Mughal ass, the way Mughals did to Indians of that time. 

@Inherited--Is that the reason people like you expect that the keys of Hindustan should have been handed over to them when Brits left in 1947. Then you should vacate Pakistan the land where Ranjeet Singh ruled over his Sikh Kingdom with Lahore as his capital for ~50 yrs. He had driven Muslim rulers/Afghans of his time and Brits did not step into his kingdom until he was alive. 

I wish Pakistan could have gone back to Akbar&#039;s days instead of worse than Aurangzeb&#039;s days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ he tried but hindus like you wanted a hindu-raj over an expansive territory conquered by muslims, inherited by the british.&#8221;<br />
&#8211;Posted by mirusmtupsha</p>
<p>&#8212;-&#8221;conquered&#8221; invaded (ok, not raped!). This is what I have being saying. if Kashmir is given to Pakistan on a platter, your generations will also say the same that Pakistan conquered Kashmir. </p>
<p>So mughals conquered and  Brits inherited? lol..what is your sensitivity abt NOT saying Brits kicked your ancestor&#8217;s Mughal ass, the way Mughals did to Indians of that time. </p>
<p>@Inherited&#8211;Is that the reason people like you expect that the keys of Hindustan should have been handed over to them when Brits left in 1947. Then you should vacate Pakistan the land where Ranjeet Singh ruled over his Sikh Kingdom with Lahore as his capital for ~50 yrs. He had driven Muslim rulers/Afghans of his time and Brits did not step into his kingdom until he was alive. </p>
<p>I wish Pakistan could have gone back to Akbar&#8217;s days instead of worse than Aurangzeb&#8217;s days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2010/07/31/taliban-names-removed-from-u-n-list-how-times-have-changed/comment-page-2/#comment-31787</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 00:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=5871#comment-31787</guid>
		<description>conquered? You meant looted and plundered?

Jinnah was craving for power and his only way to achieve that was at the cost of million lives. He went for it. His soul (where ever that may be) is surely haunted by every person who died during the partition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>conquered? You meant looted and plundered?</p>
<p>Jinnah was craving for power and his only way to achieve that was at the cost of million lives. He went for it. His soul (where ever that may be) is surely haunted by every person who died during the partition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mirusmtupsha</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2010/07/31/taliban-names-removed-from-u-n-list-how-times-have-changed/comment-page-2/#comment-31763</link>
		<dc:creator>mirusmtupsha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 16:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=5871#comment-31763</guid>
		<description>—Want to play with “if”? If arrogant Jinnah had shown a foresight, Milllions would have been alive today.

&gt;&gt; he tried but hindus like you wanted a hindu-raj over an expansive territory conquered by muslims, inherited by the british.
 
If you “aunt” had ba_ls, you would call her “uncle”

&gt;&gt; even by rajeev&#039;s standards, this is a do_uchey comeback.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>—Want to play with “if”? If arrogant Jinnah had shown a foresight, Milllions would have been alive today.</p>
<p>>> he tried but hindus like you wanted a hindu-raj over an expansive territory conquered by muslims, inherited by the british.</p>
<p>If you “aunt” had ba_ls, you would call her “uncle”</p>
<p>>> even by rajeev&#8217;s standards, this is a do_uchey comeback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RajeevK</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2010/07/31/taliban-names-removed-from-u-n-list-how-times-have-changed/comment-page-2/#comment-31681</link>
		<dc:creator>RajeevK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 06:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=5871#comment-31681</guid>
		<description>@ If nehru hadn’t blown moutbatten, you would not have gurduspur and no real geographical access to kashmir. You have no cultural affinity to kashmiris.&quot;
--Posted by mirusmtupsha 


---Want to play with &quot;if&quot;? If arrogant Jinnah had shown a foresight, Milllions would have been alive today.
If you &quot;aunt&quot; had ba_ls, you would call her &quot;uncle&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ If nehru hadn’t blown moutbatten, you would not have gurduspur and no real geographical access to kashmir. You have no cultural affinity to kashmiris.&#8221;<br />
&#8211;Posted by mirusmtupsha </p>
<p>&#8212;Want to play with &#8220;if&#8221;? If arrogant Jinnah had shown a foresight, Milllions would have been alive today.<br />
If you &#8220;aunt&#8221; had ba_ls, you would call her &#8220;uncle&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RajeevK</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2010/07/31/taliban-names-removed-from-u-n-list-how-times-have-changed/comment-page-2/#comment-31679</link>
		<dc:creator>RajeevK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 00:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=5871#comment-31679</guid>
		<description>May be this will cool you down about your respect for poetry and poets.

http://www.dawn.com/wps/wcm/connect/dawn-content-library/dawn/the-newspaper/columnists/jawed-naqvi-the-waning-romance-of-an-idea-970

Artists like Ustad Bade Ghulam Ali Khan, Saadat Hassan Manto, Zia Sarhad, Faiz Ahmad Faiz, Ustad Daman, Quratulain Haider are some of the names that went to Pakistan and languished in jails or fled back to India.

India has one example--MF Hussain driven out of country by certain allegations and pending court cases (not going into the details). But guess what he chose Kuwait over Pakistan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May be this will cool you down about your respect for poetry and poets.</p>
<p><a href='http://www.dawn.com/wps/wcm/connect/dawn-content-library/dawn/the-newspaper/columnists/jawed-naqvi-the-waning-romance-of-an-idea-970'>http://www.dawn.com/wps/wcm/connect/dawn -content-library/dawn/the-newspaper/colu mnists/jawed-naqvi-the-waning-romance-of -an-idea-970</a></p>
<p>Artists like Ustad Bade Ghulam Ali Khan, Saadat Hassan Manto, Zia Sarhad, Faiz Ahmad Faiz, Ustad Daman, Quratulain Haider are some of the names that went to Pakistan and languished in jails or fled back to India.</p>
<p>India has one example&#8211;MF Hussain driven out of country by certain allegations and pending court cases (not going into the details). But guess what he chose Kuwait over Pakistan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mirusmtupsha</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2010/07/31/taliban-names-removed-from-u-n-list-how-times-have-changed/comment-page-2/#comment-31674</link>
		<dc:creator>mirusmtupsha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 01:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=5871#comment-31674</guid>
		<description>@We have issues with your governments policy towards our kinfolk in kashmir and our territory.

Other than that, we wish you no harm and no ill will. this is a fact that your refuse to accept.
Posted by mirusmtupsha

—I diasgree that Kashmir belongs to you. 

&gt;&gt; who cares what you think?  

your long list where you mention the Mughal dynasties “raping Bharat Mata” 

&gt;&gt; I said nothing of r_pe, this is appears to be a Freudian slip on your part.  This also proves your historic baggage causing your stubborn, irrational stance to deprive kashmiris.

is an evidence that Kashmir does not belong to you. 

&gt;&gt; If nehru hadn&#039;t blown moutbatten, you would not have gurduspur and no real geographical access to kashmir.  You have no cultural affinity to kashmiris.  

Now do you want to include “raped Kashmir” in your list?

--- don&#039;t hold kashmir responsible for what my ancestors did.

@kinfolk in kashmir— oh Puhleeze. drop it.

&gt;&gt; Script, language, race, features, religion, poetry -- what do tamils have in common with kashmiris?

Because:
1. by saying kinfolks, you are excluding Kashmiri minorities–Hindus, Sikhs annd Budhists out of the equation. 

&gt;&gt; Kashmiri Hindus betrayed kashmiriyat by, collaborating with the SD&#039;s to oppress and massacre the kashmiris. 

That is not what kashmiriyat all about.



2. Kashmiris which you talk about (muslims) have kinfolks in India–14% of India’s population and about the size of Pakistan.

3. what u said “our land” suggests u approve of “Kashmir banega Pakistan” and kashmiris disapprove that.

&gt;&gt; they do now but not when you stole from my newly born nation on the basis of a worthless piece of document.

kashmir solution will happen but not to fulfill your wet dreams. 

&gt;&gt; many oppressors infinitely mightier than your mughal-gifted repulic of India have said the same and perished.

so keep dreaming and pass the dreams to your generations.

&gt;&gt; and you be sure to warn your future generations of our intentions.

Peace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@We have issues with your governments policy towards our kinfolk in kashmir and our territory.</p>
<p>Other than that, we wish you no harm and no ill will. this is a fact that your refuse to accept.<br />
Posted by mirusmtupsha</p>
<p>—I diasgree that Kashmir belongs to you. </p>
<p>>> who cares what you think?  </p>
<p>your long list where you mention the Mughal dynasties “raping Bharat Mata” </p>
<p>>> I said nothing of r_pe, this is appears to be a Freudian slip on your part.  This also proves your historic baggage causing your stubborn, irrational stance to deprive kashmiris.</p>
<p>is an evidence that Kashmir does not belong to you. </p>
<p>>> If nehru hadn&#8217;t blown moutbatten, you would not have gurduspur and no real geographical access to kashmir.  You have no cultural affinity to kashmiris.  </p>
<p>Now do you want to include “raped Kashmir” in your list?</p>
<p>&#8212; don&#8217;t hold kashmir responsible for what my ancestors did.</p>
<p>@kinfolk in kashmir— oh Puhleeze. drop it.</p>
<p>>> Script, language, race, features, religion, poetry &#8212; what do tamils have in common with kashmiris?</p>
<p>Because:<br />
1. by saying kinfolks, you are excluding Kashmiri minorities–Hindus, Sikhs annd Budhists out of the equation. </p>
<p>>> Kashmiri Hindus betrayed kashmiriyat by, collaborating with the SD&#8217;s to oppress and massacre the kashmiris. </p>
<p>That is not what kashmiriyat all about.</p>
<p>2. Kashmiris which you talk about (muslims) have kinfolks in India–14% of India’s population and about the size of Pakistan.</p>
<p>3. what u said “our land” suggests u approve of “Kashmir banega Pakistan” and kashmiris disapprove that.</p>
<p>>> they do now but not when you stole from my newly born nation on the basis of a worthless piece of document.</p>
<p>kashmir solution will happen but not to fulfill your wet dreams. </p>
<p>>> many oppressors infinitely mightier than your mughal-gifted repulic of India have said the same and perished.</p>
<p>so keep dreaming and pass the dreams to your generations.</p>
<p>>> and you be sure to warn your future generations of our intentions.</p>
<p>Peace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RajeevK</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2010/07/31/taliban-names-removed-from-u-n-list-how-times-have-changed/comment-page-2/#comment-31668</link>
		<dc:creator>RajeevK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 22:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=5871#comment-31668</guid>
		<description>@We have issues with your governments policy towards our kinfolk in kashmir and our territory.

Other than that, we wish you no harm and no ill will. this is a fact that your refuse to accept.
Posted by mirusmtupsha 

---I diasgree that Kashmir belongs to you. your long list where you mention the Mughal dynasties &quot;raping Bharat Mata&quot; is an evidence that Kashmir does not belong to you. Now do you want to include &quot;raped Kashmir&quot; in your list? 

@kinfolk in kashmir--- oh Puhleeze. drop it.

Because:
1. by saying kinfolks, you are excluding Kashmiri minorities--Hindus, Sikhs annd Budhists out of the equation. That is not what kashmiriyat all about.  

2. Kashmiris which you talk about (muslims) have kinfolks in India--14% of India&#039;s population and about the size of Pakistan.

3. what u said &quot;our land&quot; suggests u approve of &quot;Kashmir banega Pakistan&quot; and kashmiris disapprove that.

kashmir solution will happen but not to fulfill your wet dreams. so keep dreaming and pass the dreams to your generations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@We have issues with your governments policy towards our kinfolk in kashmir and our territory.</p>
<p>Other than that, we wish you no harm and no ill will. this is a fact that your refuse to accept.<br />
Posted by mirusmtupsha </p>
<p>&#8212;I diasgree that Kashmir belongs to you. your long list where you mention the Mughal dynasties &#8220;raping Bharat Mata&#8221; is an evidence that Kashmir does not belong to you. Now do you want to include &#8220;raped Kashmir&#8221; in your list? </p>
<p>@kinfolk in kashmir&#8212; oh Puhleeze. drop it.</p>
<p>Because:<br />
1. by saying kinfolks, you are excluding Kashmiri minorities&#8211;Hindus, Sikhs annd Budhists out of the equation. That is not what kashmiriyat all about.  </p>
<p>2. Kashmiris which you talk about (muslims) have kinfolks in India&#8211;14% of India&#8217;s population and about the size of Pakistan.</p>
<p>3. what u said &#8220;our land&#8221; suggests u approve of &#8220;Kashmir banega Pakistan&#8221; and kashmiris disapprove that.</p>
<p>kashmir solution will happen but not to fulfill your wet dreams. so keep dreaming and pass the dreams to your generations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kEiThZ</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2010/07/31/taliban-names-removed-from-u-n-list-how-times-have-changed/comment-page-2/#comment-31630</link>
		<dc:creator>kEiThZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 18:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=5871#comment-31630</guid>
		<description>After the lovely treatment of the Sri Lankan cricket team, I&#039;d be skeptical if any Westerner or Indian or Jew (the favourite targets of Islamists) are truly safe and eligible for Pakistani hospitality.

In any event, the security situation is such that most employers aren&#039;t willing to risk employees travelling to Pakistan and I doubt too many people fancy Pakistan as a vacation hotspot (though I hear skiing used to be fantastic in Swat).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After the lovely treatment of the Sri Lankan cricket team, I&#8217;d be skeptical if any Westerner or Indian or Jew (the favourite targets of Islamists) are truly safe and eligible for Pakistani hospitality.</p>
<p>In any event, the security situation is such that most employers aren&#8217;t willing to risk employees travelling to Pakistan and I doubt too many people fancy Pakistan as a vacation hotspot (though I hear skiing used to be fantastic in Swat).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
