Comments on: Afghanistan: Asia’s Congo http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2012/02/09/afghanistan-asias-congo/ Perspectives on Pakistan Thu, 01 Oct 2015 19:31:05 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.5 By: pakistan http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2012/02/09/afghanistan-asias-congo/comment-page-1/#comment-40289 Wed, 15 Feb 2012 22:50:11 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=8343#comment-40289 when charles Darwin, the UK zooligist went to Africa studying animals, he came to the idea of evalution, the formation of humans from the nearest animal specie Ape.Ther are many today who still agree with his theory, but when you confront these people with the theory that many humans are not biolagicaly fully developed, they squak.

Ofcourse, Iraq and Afghanistan are similar for the marines, who prowl at night and go into village house and try to terrorise old , women and children and during the day time walk into the safety of childrens in the street and distribute sweets. And once in while they demonstrate their heroism against the deads by a weak stream pissing orgy on video to show to their folks back at home the evidence of their bravery.

Afghanistan is a burial place of empires, its lush valleys have over centuries of history provided the final place of peace to the invading warriors and those who survived went back to their families and related the stories of the braves who do not know what fear is and can outmatch the speed and the endurance of their famous Afghan dogs. Bring them on is the cry of the taliban soldiers who carry the heaviest armour on their torsos in the hilly tracks and which the conventional armies use mules and the Yanks helicopters for tranporting them.

No, Afghanistan has never been colonised like Congo or Iraq for that matter, it is a land of people who have harmed no one unless under attack, have not terrorised any one unless they are terrorised, instead they protect life and specialy of their guest who are given asylum. For them dignity and freedom go hand in hand together. Do not put yourself on their wrong side, they are not very kind towards this act. They do not negotiate surrender nor are prone to blackmail. You must defeat hem on the battleground or be ready annhilation.

The rest is cobblers and a diversion.

Rex Minor

]]>
By: 007XX http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2012/02/09/afghanistan-asias-congo/comment-page-1/#comment-40264 Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:59:27 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=8343#comment-40264 Since time immemorial it is the customer that has been GOD and not that what church tells us. But the Arabs DISOBEYED this number 1 commandment by entangling with USA. And now Allah has punished them fittingly. Arab revolution has scared off their biggest customer -> USA. Drilling is already underway on North Pole and fall of (Arabic) Islam is inevitable in foreseeable future. May Allah show no mercy to its murderous and killer children. Can Pak nukes fight the will of Allah?? Can Pakistan force USA to buy oil from Arabs only?? Can Pakistan pay for Arab oil and extravagance?? Will Pakistan nuke USA’s North Pole oil drills?? Is USA not buying oil from Arabs a red line for Pakistan??

P.S.
This post of mine is will of Allah, mind it.

]]>
By: 007XX http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2012/02/09/afghanistan-asias-congo/comment-page-1/#comment-40262 Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:43:39 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=8343#comment-40262 I think I would agree with Rex’s analysis that Bill Clinton fired the first missile in wrong direction at Laden. The first tomahawk should have gone to Islamabad. Pakistan’s Islamic monster is what is troubling everyone in this world.

But 50 more years and Islam will implode. Shia-Sunni conflict is on rise already. And when the oil wells dry up in Arab world and America pulls out its force then that will be the time for Islam to BEG for food, water, shelter from rest of the world. Drilling will start shortly in polar caps and downfall of Islam is to begin anytime soon. And then Saudi may get Iranian supreme commander murdered and Iran will respond with its nukes on Saudi. Pakistan will finish of Iran with its nukes and this will give excuse enough to US and Israel to nuke Pakistan. Lets hope and pray that Allah will be merciful in punishing its murderous and killer sons.

]]>
By: 007XX http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2012/02/09/afghanistan-asias-congo/comment-page-1/#comment-40261 Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:39:07 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=8343#comment-40261 I think I would agree with Rex’s analysis that Bill Clinton fired the first missile in wrong direction at Laden. The first tomahawk should have gone to Islamabad. Pakistan’s Islamic monster is what is troubling everyone in this world.

But 50 more years and Islam will implode. Shia-Sunni conflict is on rise already. And when the oil wells dry up in Arab world and America pulls out its force then that will be the time for Islam to BEG for food, water, shelter from rest of the world. Drilling will start shortly in polar caps and downfall of Islam is to begin anytime soon. And then Saudi may get Iranian supreme commander murdered and Iran will respond with its nukes on Saudi. Pakistan will finish of Iran with its nukes and this will give excuse enough to US and Israel to nuke Pakistan. Lets hope and pray that Allah will be merciful in punishing its murderous and killer sons.

]]>
By: KPSingh01 http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2012/02/09/afghanistan-asias-congo/comment-page-1/#comment-40260 Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:08:44 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=8343#comment-40260 I disagree with the comparisons between Iraq and Afghanistan.

Iraq has oil and Afghanistan has none.

Iraq was run by a dictator who did not thrust radical Islam on his people. The country was secular. His foreign minister was Tariq Aziz who was a Christian. Afghanistan had become a swamp for radicalized religious fanatics who took the country back by a thousand years.

There was absolutely no compelling reason to invade Iraq and dethrone Saddam Hussein. He had no nuclear weapons or enrichment capability. Everything the US was accusing of about Iraq, was in Pakistan, the closest ally of the US.

US was attacked by Arab radicals who used Afghanistan as their launching ground. These Arabs wanted the US to get out of Saudi Arabia and the Middle East altogether.

The US messed up Af-Pak in its pursuit of defeating the USSR. While succeeding in that mission, it helped create the monster of Islamic radicalism and terrorism that has come to haunt its own people.

The only thing common between Iraq and Af-Pak is that the US messed up both places. If left to itself, Iraq might have gone through the Arab revolution on its own accord and ousted Saddam Hussein by now. Gadaffi had a much stronger hold on his country than Saddam did. Yet Ghaddaffi was gone. There was nothing for the US to do in Iraq. On hind sight, the USSR was a better enemy than the one US is facing now.

]]>