<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Peter Lauria</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/peter-lauria/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/peter-lauria</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2013 02:15:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>News Corp, popular tech blog contemplate split -sources</title>
		<link>http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/02/16/newscorp-allthingsd-contract-idUSL1N0BG01520130216?feedType=RSS&#038;feedName=everything&#038;virtualBrandChannel=11563</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.reuters.com/peter-lauria/2013/02/16/news-corp-popular-tech-blog-contemplate-split-sources/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2013 01:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Lauria</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/peter-lauria/?p=109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Feb 15 (Reuters) &#8211; AllThingsD, the widely read technology blog run by Kara Swisher and Walt Mossberg, has begun discussions with owner News Corp about extending or ending their partnership, sources familiar with the situation told Reuters. According to these sources, AllThingsD&#8217;s contract with News Corp expires at the end of the year. One of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Feb 15 (Reuters) &#8211; AllThingsD, the widely read technology<br />
blog run by Kara Swisher and Walt Mossberg, has begun<br />
discussions with owner News Corp about extending or<br />
ending their partnership, sources familiar with the situation<br />
told Reuters.</p>
<p>According to these sources, AllThingsD&#8217;s contract with News<br />
Corp expires at the end of the year. One of the sources said<br />
Swisher and Mossberg have to deliver a business plan by next<br />
week to Robert Thomson, the former Wall Street Journal managing<br />
editor who will run News Corp&#8217;s publishing unit as CEO after it<br />
is spun off.</p>
<p>The fact that AllThingsD&#8217;s contract is up this year is well<br />
known, and the sources said the website is receiving a lot of<br />
&#8220;inbound interest&#8221; from potential buyers parallel to its talks<br />
with News Corp.</p>
<p>Among the names mentioned by one of the sources as having<br />
reached out to AllThingsD was Conde Nast, where Swisher recently<br />
agreed to work as a contributing writer for Vanity Fair, and<br />
Hearst.</p>
<p>The sources also speculated that former Yahoo and<br />
News Corp executive Ross Levinsohn might be looking at the<br />
website given his new role as Chief Executive of Guggenheim<br />
Digital Media, which according to the press release announcing<br />
his hiring, comes complete with &#8220;significant capital to acquire<br />
and invest in new media companies.&#8221; The private equity shop<br />
already owns Billboard, Hollywood Reporter, and Adweek.</p>
<p>AllThingsD has reported that AOL expressed interest in<br />
acquiring it in the past, but said those talks &#8220;were preliminary<br />
at best.&#8221;</p>
<p>Calls to AllThingsD were referred to a News Corp<br />
representative who declined comment. A Conde Nast representative<br />
declined comment. Calls to Hearst were not immediately returned.<br />
Calls and emails to Ross Levinsohn were not returned.</p>
<p>While AllThingsD is recognized as the brainchild of Swisher<br />
and Mossberg, News Corp actually owns the website and its name.<br />
However, according to provisions in their contract, Swisher and<br />
Mossberg have approval authority over any sale, one of the<br />
sources said.</p>
<p>Technically, News Corp could retain the AllThingsD&#8217;s name in<br />
the event of a sale, forcing Swisher and Mossberg to start a new<br />
venture under a different brand name. But historically in these<br />
types of situations a deal is usually worked out to allow the<br />
founders to take the company name with them as part of a<br />
settlement.</p>
<p>The sources described the website and conference business<br />
combined as profitable. AllThingsD was first launched as a<br />
conference, &#8220;D: All Things Digital&#8221; in 2003, and a website<br />
followed.</p>
<p>It has grown into a technology industry must-read, and<br />
features the conference division known for snagging A-list<br />
corporate executives for interview sessions. Apple&#8217;s<br />
Steve Jobs, Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg, Microsoft<br />
 founder Bill Gates, and virtually every other major<br />
technology executive has spoken at the D Conference.</p>
<p>Earlier this week, AllThingsD&#8217;s well-regarded media writer,<br />
Peter Kafka, led a media-centric conference for the website that<br />
included panels with Intel&#8217;s Erik Huggers, Live Nation<br />
 CEO Michael Rapino, and Netflix&#8217;s programming<br />
boss Ted Sarandos, among others.</p>
<p>The website has two more conferences on the agenda for this<br />
year: a mobile one that was postponed until April due to<br />
Hurricane Sandy, and the main D Conference in May.</p>
<p>The sources described the relationship between News Corp and<br />
AllThingsD as amicable but stressed.</p>
<p>&#8220;Like all partnerships, there could be more cooperation<br />
between the two,&#8221; said one of the sources. &#8220;There is tension<br />
between AllThingsD and the Wall Street Journal, for example.&#8221;</p>
<p>As a result of management changes, over the last few years<br />
the website has reported to numerous Wall Street Journal and<br />
News Corp executives, among them Gordon Crovitz, Les Hinton, and<br />
now Lex Fenwick and Robert Thomson.</p>
<p>Should the two sides reach a deal on a new contract,<br />
AllThingsD would be included as part of the publishing unit in<br />
the News Corp split, one of the sources said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.reuters.com/peter-lauria/2013/02/16/news-corp-popular-tech-blog-contemplate-split-sources/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Exclusive: News Corp, popular tech blog contemplate split &#8211; sources</title>
		<link>http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/02/15/us-newscorp-allthingsd-contract-idUSBRE91E14C20130215?feedType=RSS&#038;feedName=everything&#038;virtualBrandChannel=11563</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.reuters.com/peter-lauria/2013/02/15/exclusive-news-corp-popular-tech-blog-contemplate-split-sources/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 21:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Lauria</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/peter-lauria/?p=107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Peter Lauria and Nadia Damouni (Reuters) &#8211; AllThingsD, the widely read technology blog run by Kara Swisher and Walt Mossberg, has begun discussions with owner News Corp about extending or ending their partnership, sources familiar with the situation told Reuters. According to these sources, AllThingsD&#8217;s contract with News Corp expires at the end of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By <a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/search/journalist.php?edition=us&#038;n=Peter.Lauria">Peter Lauria</a> and <a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/search/journalist.php?edition=us&#038;n=Nadia.Damouni">Nadia Damouni</a></p>
<p>(Reuters) &#8211; AllThingsD, the widely read technology blog run by Kara Swisher and Walt Mossberg, has begun discussions with owner News Corp about extending or ending their partnership, sources familiar with the situation told Reuters.</p>
<p>According to these sources, AllThingsD&#8217;s contract with News Corp expires at the end of the year. One of the sources said Swisher and Mossberg have to deliver a business plan by next week to Robert Thomson, the former Wall Street Journal managing editor who will helm News Corp&#8217;s publishing unit as CEO after it is spun off.</p>
<p>The fact that AllThingsD&#8217;s contract is up this year is well known, and sources said the website is receiving a lot of &#8220;inbound interest&#8221; from potential buyers parallel to its talks with News Corp.</p>
<p>Among the names mentioned as having reached out to AllThingsD were Conde Nast, where Swisher recently signed to work as a contributing writer for Vanity Fair, and Hearst.</p>
<p>Sources also speculated that former Yahoo and News Corp executive Ross Levinsohn might be looking at the website given his new role as Chief Executive of Guggenheim Digital Media, which comes complete with &#8220;significant capital to acquire and invest in new media companies.&#8221; The private equity shop already owns Billboard, Hollywood Reporter, and Adweek.</p>
<p>AllThingsD has reported that AOL expressed interest in acquiring it in the past, but said those talks &#8220;were preliminary at best.&#8221;</p>
<p>Calls to AllThingsD were referred to a News Corp representative who declined comment. A Conde Nast representative declined comment. Calls to Hearst were not immediately returned. Calls and emails to Ross Levinsohn were not returned.</p>
<p>While AllThingsD is recognized as the brainchild of Swisher and Mossberg, News Corp actually owns the website and its name. However, according to provisions in their contract, Swisher and Mossberg have approval authority over any sale, the first source said.</p>
<p>Technically, News Corp could retain the AllThingsD name in the event of a sale, forcing Swisher and Mossberg to start a new venture under a different brand name. But historically in these types of situations a deal is usually worked out to allow the founders to take the company name with them as part of a settlement.</p>
<p>Sources described the website as profitable. It has grown into a technology industry must-read, and features a popular conference division known for snagging A-list corporate executives for intimate interview sessions. Apple&#8217;s Steve Jobs, Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg, Microsoft founder Bill Gates, and virtually every other major technology executive has spoken at the D Conference, as it is known.</p>
<p>Earlier this week, AllThingsD&#8217;s well-regarded media writer, Peter Kafka, led a media-centric conference for the website that included panels with Intel&#8217;s Eric Huggers, Live Nation CEO Michael Rapino, and Netflix&#8217;s programming boss Ted Sarandos, among others.</p>
<p>The website has two more conferences on the docket for this year: a mobile one that was postponed until April due to Hurricane Sandy, and the main D Conference in May.</p>
<p>Sources described the relationship between News Corp and AllThingsD as amicable but stressed.</p>
<p>&#8220;Like all partnership, there could be more cooperation between the two,&#8221; said one source. &#8220;There is tension between AllThingsD and the Wall Street Journal, for example.&#8221;</p>
<p>As a result of management changes, over the last few years the website has reported to numerous News Corp executives, among them Gordon Crovitz, Les Hinton, and now Lex Fenwick and Robert Thomson.</p>
<p>Should the two sides reach a deal on a new contract, AllThingsD would be included as part of the publishing unit in the News Corp split.</p>
<p>(Additional reporting by Jennifer Saba; Editing by David Gregorio)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.reuters.com/peter-lauria/2013/02/15/exclusive-news-corp-popular-tech-blog-contemplate-split-sources/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time Warner in talks with Meredith on magazines: source</title>
		<link>http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/02/13/us-timewarner-timeinc-idUSBRE91C1CQ20130213?feedType=RSS&#038;feedName=everything&#038;virtualBrandChannel=11563</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.reuters.com/peter-lauria/2013/02/13/time-warner-in-talks-with-meredith-on-magazines-source/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 21:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Lauria</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/peter-lauria/?p=105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Peter Lauria (Reuters) &#8211; Time Warner Inc is in talks to sell the majority of its magazine division to Meredith Corp, according to a source familiar with the situation. The source, who asked not to be named, said the talks are in the early stages and were &#8220;very fluid.&#8221; The valuation being ascribed to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By <a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/search/journalist.php?edition=us&#038;n=Peter.Lauria">Peter Lauria</a></p>
<p>(Reuters) &#8211; Time Warner Inc is in talks to sell the majority of its magazine division to Meredith Corp, according to a source familiar with the situation.</p>
<p>The source, who asked not to be named, said the talks are in the early stages and were &#8220;very fluid.&#8221; The valuation being ascribed to Time Inc, the nation&#8217;s largest magazine publisher with titles such as Time, Sports Illustrated and People, ranges from $2 billion to $3.5 billion.</p>
<p>A report in Fortune magazine, one of Time Inc&#8217;s titles, said a meeting with a potential buyer was scheduled for today.</p>
<p>A Time Inc representative did not immediately return a request for comment. A representative for Meredith declined comment.</p>
<p>Under one scenario being discussed, Meredith would acquire all the Time Inc titles outside of news and sports. These would include In Style, Real Simple, and People, all of which fit with Meredith&#8217;s strategic focus on magazines oriented toward women.</p>
<p>The source said Time Warner sees an upside in retaining Time, Sports Illustrated and Fortune, iconic brands among the leaders in their categories. The conglomerate thinks it also could leverage those titles into ancillary businesses such as conferences.</p>
<p>In another potential scenario, both Meredith and Time Inc would contribute magazines to a newly formed independent company in which each would hold a stake, said the source, who added that a private equity firm could also be brought in to help capitalize that type of venture.</p>
<p>Magazines and newspapers are dealing with declining advertising revenue as more readers and advertisers migrate to digital formats.</p>
<p>In 2012, revenue at Time Inc dropped 7 percent to $3.4 billion on declines in advertising and subscription revenue. Operating income fell 25 percent for the same period.</p>
<p>Time Inc announced in January it planned to cut about 500 jobs, or about 6 percent of its workforce.</p>
<p>(Additional reporting By Jennifer Saba in New York; Editing by Gerald E. McCormick and David Gregorio)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.reuters.com/peter-lauria/2013/02/13/time-warner-in-talks-with-meredith-on-magazines-source/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comcast to buy rest of NBC Universal from GE in $16.7 billion deal</title>
		<link>http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/02/13/us-ge-nbc-idUSBRE91B1IM20130213?feedType=RSS&#038;feedName=everything&#038;virtualBrandChannel=11563</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.reuters.com/peter-lauria/2013/02/13/comcast-to-buy-rest-of-nbc-universal-from-ge-in-16-7-billion-deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 08:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Lauria</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/peter-lauria/?p=103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Liana B. Baker and Peter Lauria (Reuters) &#8211; Comcast Corp clinched full control of NBC Universal for $16.7 billion on Tuesday, the latest in a series of deals that have taken the cable operator from humble roots in Tupelo, Mississippi, to Manhattan&#8217;s iconic Rockerfeller Center. The nation&#8217;s largest cable operator unveiled plans on Tuesday [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By <a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/search/journalist.php?edition=us&#038;n=Liana.B">Liana B</a>. Baker and <a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/search/journalist.php?edition=us&#038;n=Peter.Lauria">Peter Lauria</a></p>
<p>(Reuters) &#8211; Comcast Corp clinched full control of NBC Universal for $16.7 billion on Tuesday, the latest in a series of deals that have taken the cable operator from humble roots in Tupelo, Mississippi, to Manhattan&#8217;s iconic Rockerfeller Center.</p>
<p>The nation&#8217;s largest cable operator unveiled plans on Tuesday to buy out General Electric Co&#8217;s remaining 49 percent stake in the NBC Universal joint venture. That gives it full control of one of the industry&#8217;s largest and most profitable stable of cable networks, as well as the NBC broadcast network with its recognizable peacock logo.</p>
<p>Combining properties such as USA Network, Universal Studios and more than 22 million cable subscribers, the deal completes a 50-year transformation for Comcast, which was founded by Chief Executive Officer Brian Roberts&#8217; father, Ralph, in 1963.</p>
<p>Comcast bought 51 percent of NBC Universal in 2011 after winning antitrust approval from the Justice Department. Tuesday&#8217;s deal comes at least two years sooner than planned and creates a $39 billion business owed primarily to the success of marrying cable distribution with cable programming. The rational behind the deal differentiates Comcast from rivals such as Time Warner Cable Inc, which separated content from distribution.</p>
<p>&#8220;The reality is content has gotten stronger and stronger and safer and safer, so Comcast should be trading at a premium to the cable operators. They are an integrated media and entertainment company. They are not just a cable operator,&#8221; said John Tinker, an analyst at Maxim Group.</p>
<p>In addition to the main deal, which pushed up Comcast shares about 7 percent in after hours trading, Comcast will also gain full control of the floors NBC uses at 30 Rockefeller Plaza in New York City and CNBC&#8217;s headquarters in Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, for about $1.4 billion.</p>
<p>Comcast said it would fund the deal with $11.4 billion of cash on hand, $4 billion in senior unsecured notes to be issued to GE, $2 billion in credit facility borrowings and the issuance of $725 million in subsidiary preferred stock to GE.</p>
<p>&#8220;Given that media stocks have gone up quite a bit, it&#8217;s a very attractive price, a fair price because we had a formula buyout,&#8221; Roberts, who is also chairman of the company, said in an interview with Reuters.</p>
<p>Separately, Comcast said it would increase its dividend by 20 percent and it would buy back $2 billion in stock this year. GE also said it would accelerate its own share buy-back program to $10 billion this year.</p>
<p>&#8220;People may have their own opinions on whether it&#8217;s good or bad strategically, but it doesn&#8217;t leave any unanswered questions financially. For a transaction of this nature and this size, it&#8217;s a relatively low-risk structure,&#8221; Brean Capital analyst Todd Mitchell said.</p>
<p>Since reaching the deal to sell its majority stake in NBC Universal, GE officials have made clear they eventually planned to exit the entertainment business entirely. So the moves announced on Tuesday culminate a long-planned exit from the entertainment business.</p>
<p>Comcast shares rose to $41.75 after the market close from $38.97 in regular trading.</p>
<p>LONG-HELD AMBITIONS</p>
<p>Comcast turned its attention to NBC after a failed $54 billion hostile takeover attempt of Walt Disney Co in 2004 that ultimately led to the resignation of that company&#8217;s CEO, Michael Eisner, after more than 20 years on the job.</p>
<p>While Comcast held the title of the nation&#8217;s leading cable operator by a wide margin, its status as a content player was always second tier, with middling networks such as E!, G4 and Golf forming the basis of its channel portfolio.</p>
<p>A source familiar with the situation said talks accelerated in July 2012 when NBC Universal sold its stake in A&#038;E Television Networks for $3 billion. Comcast and GE were debating how to use the proceeds, with Comcast wanting to keep the cash in the company while GE wanted a dividend.</p>
<p>When it first bought NBC Universal, Comcast tread lightly, in part to smooth the way for regulatory approval. Among the concessions it offered to help seal the original deal was to adopt a hands-off policy towards the news division to ensure its independence, ensure diversity by agreeing to carry networks aimed at minority audiences and remove itself from management decisions regarding online video site Hulu. Comcast owns a passive stake in Hulu, with News Corp and Disney controlling the website&#8217;s management.</p>
<p>Comcast also agreed to ‘net neutrality&#8217; provisions to ensure traffic to competitor websites was not interfered with and to make NBC&#8217;s programming available to other cable and satellite TV distributors on equal terms.</p>
<p>Because the Justice Department looked at the 2011 transaction, this one would not need to be investigated, said Richard Brosnick, an antitrust expert with law firm Butzel Long.</p>
<p>&#8220;The only way that the government would look further at this is if Comcast violated its consent decree,&#8221; said Brosnick.</p>
<p>A source close to Comcast said the company did not anticipate it would be required to file for antitrust approval with either the Justice Department or the Federal Communications Commission.</p>
<p>Comcast has slowly but steadily replaced NBC&#8217;s former regime with its own people since closing the deal. Steve Burke, the longtime top lieutenant to Roberts at Comcast, runs NBC Universal. Former CEO Jeff Zucker is gone. So too is former NBC Entertainment chief Jeff Gaspin and longtime sports producer Dick Ebersol, among others.</p>
<p>In February, Steve Capus announced he was leaving as head of NBC News. That decision, according to sources, was motivated in part by Comcast&#8217;s installing one its executives, Patricia Fili-Krushel, into the newly created position of chairman of NBC Universal News Group and making Capus, along with CNBC president Mark Hoffman and MSNBC president Phil Griffin, report to her.</p>
<p>Indeed, the only executives that still remain from the old regime are the leaders of cable networks and Universal Studios head Ron Meyer, who ranks as the longest-serving movie studio chief in Hollywood. On the cable side, in addition to Hoffman and Griffin, Bonnie Hammer now runs all of NBC&#8217;s entertainment-oriented cable networks and Lauren Zalaznick leads its digital operations. Bob Greenblatt, the former head of Showtime, now runs the NBC broadcast network and Mark Lazarus leads the sports division.</p>
<p>In addition to the GE deal, Comcast reported a 6 percent rise in fourth-quarter earnings on Tuesday. In its cable business, it lost a better-than-expected 7,000 net video customers. For the year, NBC Universal&#8217;s revenue rose 5 percent to $6.01 billion.</p>
<p>Morgan Stanley served as Comcast&#8217;s financial adviser and Davis Polk &#038; Wardell was its legal adviser. J.P. Morgan was financial adviser to GE and Weil, Gotshal &#038; Manges was the legal adviser.</p>
<p>(Reporting by Scott Malone in Boston, Jennifer Saba in New York, Diane Bartz in Washington and A. Ananthalakshmi in Bangalore; Writing by Ben Berkowitz.; Editing by Edward Tobin, Dan Grebler and Andre Grenon)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.reuters.com/peter-lauria/2013/02/13/comcast-to-buy-rest-of-nbc-universal-from-ge-in-16-7-billion-deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comcast to buy rest of NBC Universal from GE in $16.7B deal</title>
		<link>http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/02/13/comcast-ge-nbcuniversal-idUSL4N0BC53220130213?feedType=RSS&#038;feedName=everything&#038;virtualBrandChannel=11563</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.reuters.com/peter-lauria/2013/02/13/comcast-to-buy-rest-of-nbc-universal-from-ge-in-16-7b-deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 02:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Lauria</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/peter-lauria/?p=101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Feb 12 (Reuters) &#8211; Comcast Corp clinched full control of NBC Universal for $16.7 billion on Tuesday, the latest in a series of deals that have taken the cable operator from humble roots in Tupelo, Mississippi, to Manhattan&#8217;s iconic Rockerfeller Center. The nation&#8217;s largest cable operator unveiled plans on Tuesday to buy out General Electric [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Feb 12 (Reuters) &#8211; Comcast Corp clinched full<br />
control of NBC Universal for $16.7 billion on Tuesday, the<br />
latest in a series of deals that have taken the cable operator<br />
from humble roots in Tupelo, Mississippi, to Manhattan&#8217;s iconic<br />
Rockerfeller Center.</p>
<p>The nation&#8217;s largest cable operator unveiled plans on<br />
Tuesday to buy out General Electric Co&#8217;s remaining 49<br />
percent stake in the NBC Universal joint venture. That gives it<br />
full control of one of the industry&#8217;s largest and most<br />
profitable stable of cable networks, as well as the NBC<br />
broadcast network with its recognizable peacock logo.</p>
<p>Combining properties such as USA Network, Universal Studios<br />
and more than 22 million cable subscribers, the deal completes a<br />
50-year transformation for Comcast, which was founded by Chief<br />
Executive Officer Brian Roberts&#8217; father, Ralph, in 1963.</p>
<p>Comcast bought 51 percent of NBC Universal in 2011 after<br />
winning antitrust approval from the Justice Department.<br />
Tuesday&#8217;s deal comes at least two years sooner than planned and<br />
creates a $39 billion business owed primarily to the success of<br />
marrying cable distribution with cable programming. The rational<br />
behind the deal differentiates Comcast from rivals such as Time<br />
Warner Cable Inc, which separated content from<br />
distribution.</p>
<p>&#8220;The reality is content has gotten stronger and stronger and<br />
safer and safer, so Comcast should be trading at a premium to<br />
the cable operators. They are an integrated media and<br />
entertainment company. They are not just a cable operator,&#8221; said<br />
John Tinker, an analyst at Maxim Group.</p>
<p>In addition to the main deal, which pushed up Comcast shares<br />
about 7 percent in after hours trading, Comcast will also gain<br />
full control of the floors NBC uses at 30 Rockefeller Plaza in<br />
New York City and CNBC&#8217;s headquarters in Englewood Cliffs, New<br />
Jersey, for about $1.4 billion.</p>
<p>Comcast said it would fund the deal with $11.4 billion of<br />
cash on hand, $4 billion in senior unsecured notes to be issued<br />
to GE, $2 billion in credit facility borrowings and the issuance<br />
of $725 million in subsidiary preferred stock to GE.</p>
<p>&#8220;Given that media stocks have gone up quite a bit, it&#8217;s a<br />
very attractive price, a fair price because we had a formula<br />
buyout,&#8221; Roberts, who is also chairman of the company, said in<br />
an interview with Reuters.</p>
<p>Separately, Comcast said it would increase its dividend by<br />
20 percent and it would buy back $2 billion in stock this year.<br />
GE also said it would accelerate its own share buy-back program<br />
to $10 billion this year.</p>
<p>&#8220;People may have their own opinions on whether it&#8217;s good or<br />
bad strategically, but it doesn&#8217;t leave any unanswered questions<br />
financially. For a transaction of this nature and this size,<br />
it&#8217;s a relatively low-risk structure,&#8221; Brean Capital analyst<br />
Todd Mitchell said.</p>
<p>Since reaching the deal to sell its majority stake in NBC<br />
Universal, GE officials have made clear they eventually planned<br />
to exit the entertainment business entirely. So the moves<br />
announced on Tuesday culminate a long-planned exit from the<br />
entertainment business.</p>
<p>Comcast shares rose to $41.75 after the market close from<br />
$38.97 in regular trading.</p>
</p>
<p>LONG-HELD AMBITIONS</p>
<p>Comcast turned its attention to NBC after a failed $54<br />
billion hostile takeover attempt of Walt Disney Co in<br />
2004 that ultimately led to the resignation of that company&#8217;s<br />
CEO, Michael Eisner, after more than 20 years on the job.</p>
<p>While Comcast held the title of the nation&#8217;s leading cable<br />
operator by a wide margin, its status as a content player was<br />
always second tier, with middling networks such as E!, G4 and<br />
Golf forming the basis of its channel portfolio.</p>
<p>A source familiar with the situation said talks accelerated<br />
in July 2012 when NBC Universal sold its stake in A&#038;E Television<br />
Networks for $3 billion. Comcast and GE were debating how to use<br />
the proceeds, with Comcast wanting to keep the cash in the<br />
company while GE wanted a dividend.</p>
<p>When it first bought NBC Universal, Comcast tread lightly,<br />
in part to smooth the way for regulatory approval. Among the<br />
concessions it offered to help seal the original deal was to<br />
adopt a hands-off policy towards the news division to ensure its<br />
independence, ensure diversity by agreeing to carry networks<br />
aimed at minority audiences and remove itself from management<br />
decisions regarding online video site Hulu. Comcast owns a<br />
passive stake in Hulu, with News Corp and Disney<br />
controlling the website&#8217;s management.</p>
<p>Comcast also agreed to &#8216;net neutrality&#8217; provisions to<br />
ensure traffic to competitor websites was not interfered with<br />
and to make NBC&#8217;s programming available to other cable and<br />
satellite TV distributors on equal terms.</p>
<p>Because the Justice Department looked at the 2011<br />
transaction, this one would not need to be investigated, said<br />
Richard Brosnick, an antitrust expert with law firm Butzel Long.</p>
<p>&#8220;The only way that the government would look further at this<br />
is if Comcast violated its consent decree,&#8221; said Brosnick.</p>
<p>A source close to Comcast said the company did not<br />
anticipate it would be required to file for antitrust approval<br />
with either the Justice Department or the Federal Communications<br />
Commission.</p>
<p>Comcast has slowly but steadily replaced NBC&#8217;s former regime<br />
with its own people since closing the deal. Steve Burke, the<br />
longtime top lieutenant to Roberts at Comcast, runs NBC<br />
Universal. Former CEO Jeff Zucker is gone. So too is former NBC<br />
Entertainment chief Jeff Gaspin and longtime sports producer<br />
Dick Ebersol, among others.</p>
<p>In February, Steve Capus announced he was leaving as head of<br />
NBC News. That decision, according to sources, was motivated in<br />
part by Comcast&#8217;s installing one its executives, Patricia<br />
Fili-Krushel, into the newly created position of chairman of NBC<br />
Universal News Group and making Capus, along with CNBC president<br />
Mark Hoffman and MSNBC president Phil Griffin, report to her.</p>
<p>Indeed, the only executives that still remain from the old<br />
regime are the leaders of cable networks and Universal Studios<br />
head Ron Meyer, who ranks as the longest-serving movie studio<br />
chief in Hollywood. On the cable side, in addition to Hoffman<br />
and Griffin, Bonnie Hammer now runs all of NBC&#8217;s<br />
entertainment-oriented cable networks and Lauren Zalaznick leads<br />
its digital operations. Bob Greenblatt, the former head of<br />
Showtime, now runs the NBC broadcast network and Mark<br />
Lazarus leads the sports division.</p>
<p>In addition to the GE deal, Comcast reported a 6 percent<br />
rise in fourth-quarter earnings on Tuesday. In its cable<br />
business, it lost a better-than-expected 7,000 net video<br />
customers. For the year, NBC Universal&#8217;s revenue rose 5 percent<br />
to $6.01 billion.</p>
<p>Morgan Stanley served as Comcast&#8217;s financial adviser and<br />
Davis Polk &#038; Wardell was its legal adviser. J.P. Morgan was<br />
financial adviser to GE and Weil, Gotshal &#038; Manges was the legal<br />
adviser. </p>
<p> (Reporting by Scott Malone in Boston, Jennifer Saba in New<br />
York, Diane Bartz in Washington and A. Ananthalakshmi in<br />
Bangalore; Writing by Ben Berkowitz.; Editing by Edward Tobin,<br />
Dan Grebler and Andre Grenon)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.reuters.com/peter-lauria/2013/02/13/comcast-to-buy-rest-of-nbc-universal-from-ge-in-16-7b-deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NBC News President Capus to leave network</title>
		<link>http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/02/01/comcast-nbcnews-capus-idUSL1N0B1AQ420130201?feedType=RSS&#038;feedName=everything&#038;virtualBrandChannel=11563</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.reuters.com/peter-lauria/2013/02/01/nbc-news-president-capus-to-leave-network/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 21:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Lauria</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/peter-lauria/?p=99</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Feb 1 (Reuters) &#8211; NBC News President Steve Capus will be leaving the network in the coming weeks after struggles at the unit, including lower ratings for its flagship morning show, &#8220;Today.&#8221; No replacement has been named for Capus, president of NBC News since 2005, according to a company memo obtained by Reuters. In a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Feb 1 (Reuters) &#8211; NBC News President Steve Capus will be<br />
leaving the network in the coming weeks after struggles at the<br />
unit, including lower ratings for its flagship morning show,<br />
&#8220;Today.&#8221;</p>
<p>No replacement has been named for Capus, president of NBC<br />
News since 2005, according to a company memo obtained by<br />
Reuters. In a statement, Capus said it was &#8220;now time to head in<br />
a new direction.&#8221;</p>
<p>Three sources close to NBC said his departure had been<br />
rumored around the halls after Comcast reorganized the<br />
news division in July, bringing in Patricia Fili-Krushel to head<br />
the news unit&#8217;s business operations. After that change, these<br />
sources said, Capus&#8217; departure became a matter of when, not if.</p>
<p>Prior to Comcast&#8217;s takeover, the three heads of NBC&#8217;s news<br />
operations &#8211; Mark Hoffman at CNBC, Phil Griffin at MSNBC and<br />
Capus &#8211; all reported directly into Jeff Zucker, who was not only<br />
NBC&#8217;s chief executive but also well-versed in hard news.</p>
<p>&#8220;There was a natural flow to the news division under Zucker.<br />
They all spoke the same language,&#8221; said one of these sources.<br />
&#8220;No disrespect to Pat, but she&#8217;s not viewed as a news person.&#8221;</p>
<p>Indeed, both Capus and Zucker basically grew up with each<br />
other at NBC, spending about 20 years together at the network.<br />
Capus did not say what his next move would be. Zucker, the<br />
executive who promoted him seven years ago at NBC, is now the<br />
worldwide president of CNN, owned by Time Warner Inc.</p>
<p>The sources said it would not be a surprise if Capus<br />
eventually resurfaced in a new position under Zucker at CNN.<br />
Earlier this week, Mark Whitaker, the managing editor at CNN,<br />
announced his resignation to make room for Zucker to install his<br />
own team. Prior to his joining CNN, Whitaker worked at NBC News<br />
under both Capus and Zucker.</p>
<p>Fili-Krushel said in a memo to staff on Friday that until a<br />
replacement for Capus is found, NBC News will operate under an<br />
interim structure with various executives reporting to her. She<br />
will start the search for a successor in coming weeks, with<br />
Capus helping with the transition.</p>
<p>Two other sources said that internally the view recently has<br />
been that Antoine Sanfuentes, an executive who oversees NBC<br />
News&#8217; Washington bureau and the Sunday political talk program<br />
&#8220;Meet the Press,&#8221; was being groomed to replace Capus.<br />
Fili-Krushel said in her memo that Sanfuentes will report to her<br />
and serve as interim managing editor responsible for editorial<br />
decision making.</p>
<p>The first sources said they had expected Capus to announce<br />
his departure at the end of last year to coincide with the<br />
announcement that Jim Bell was leaving as executive producer of<br />
the &#8220;Today&#8221; show to assume the newly created role of full-time<br />
executive producer of the Olympics.</p>
<p>Ultimately, he decided to trigger his departure by<br />
exercising an &#8220;out&#8221; clause built into his most recent contract,<br />
according to one of the first three sources.</p>
<p>Capus commanded the loyalty of the NBC News staff,<br />
particularly the on-air talent and producers, all of the five<br />
sources agreed. News of his resignation came as an unexpected<br />
blow to them, despite the apparent grooming of Sanfuentes.</p>
</p>
<p>RECENT STRUGGLES</p>
<p>NBC News has been the one part of the network&#8217;s news<br />
operations to show slippage in the last year. CNBC ranks as by<br />
far the leading business news network. MSNBC has not only<br />
surpassed CNN to become a strong No. 2 among general cable news<br />
networks, but it has also closed the gap with long-time leader<br />
Fox News.</p>
<p>&#8220;Pat Fili-Krushel has a strong vision of the integration<br />
that is required to make the full array of NBC programming fire<br />
on all cylinders in unison. She also understands the need to<br />
complement both the owned station and Comcast cable group goals<br />
to leverage all to best advantage,&#8221; said Magid &#038; Associates<br />
consultant Steve Ridge.</p>
<p>NBC News has ranked as the leader among network news<br />
broadcasts in both the morning and evening for much of Capus&#8217;<br />
eight-year run as president. Two of the first three sources said<br />
he deserves credit for maintaining the &#8220;Today&#8221; show as the<br />
dominate morning news program, &#8220;NBC Nightly News&#8221; as the leading<br />
evening news broadcast, and &#8220;Meet the Press&#8221; as the marquee<br />
Sunday news program. But over the last year, Capus&#8217; fiefdom has<br />
taken a few hits, most notably at the &#8220;Today&#8221; show.</p>
<p>The &#8220;Today&#8221; show has been in a back-and-forth ratings war<br />
with ABC&#8217;s &#8220;Good Morning America&#8221; ever since ABC snapped<br />
NBC&#8217;s 16-year unbeaten streak last year. &#8220;NBC Nightly News&#8221; is<br />
averaging 8.76 million total viewers, ahead of &#8220;ABC World News&#8221;<br />
and &#8220;CBS Evening News.&#8221; &#8220;It has seen less ratings success with<br />
the news magazine &#8220;Rock Center with Brian Williams,&#8221; which<br />
debuted in 2011 and after being bounced around the schedule,<br />
will move to Friday nights on Feb 8.</p>
<p>NBC News also came under fire last spring when it decided to<br />
edit a call to police from George Zimmerman, the Florida man who<br />
shot Trayvon Martin. The editing made it appear that Zimmerman<br />
told police, without being prompted, that Martin was black when,<br />
in fact, the full tape revealed that the neighborhood watch<br />
captain did so only when responding to a question posed by a<br />
dispatcher.</p>
<p>NBC has since been sued by Zimmerman in a defamation<br />
lawsuit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.reuters.com/peter-lauria/2013/02/01/nbc-news-president-capus-to-leave-network/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Al Jazeera&#8217;s new channel struggles for U.S. distribution</title>
		<link>http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/01/04/currentv-aljazeera-idUSL1E9C39A720130104?feedType=RSS&#038;feedName=everything&#038;virtualBrandChannel=11563</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.reuters.com/peter-lauria/2013/01/04/al-jazeeras-new-channel-struggles-for-u-s-distribution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 01:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Lauria</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/peter-lauria/?p=97</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NEW YORK, Jan 3 (Reuters) &#8211; Al Jazeera&#8217;s announced plans to establish a new U.S. cable news channel via the purchase of Current TV isn&#8217;t even 48 hours old and already it finds itself in a vicious battle to retain distribution rights. Al Jazeera&#8217;s acquisition of Current TV is basically a pay-for-distribution play. The Qatar-backed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NEW YORK, Jan 3 (Reuters) &#8211; Al Jazeera&#8217;s announced plans to<br />
establish a new U.S. cable news channel via the purchase of<br />
Current TV isn&#8217;t even 48 hours old and already it finds itself<br />
in a vicious battle to retain distribution rights.</p>
<p>Al Jazeera&#8217;s acquisition of Current TV is basically a<br />
pay-for-distribution play. The Qatar-backed network plans to<br />
replace Current TV in the more than 40 million homes where it is<br />
currently distributed with its own news network, tentatively<br />
dubbed Al Jazeera America. The new network&#8217;s success is<br />
predicated on maintaining, if not increasing, that level of<br />
distribution.</p>
<p>One person with knowledge of cable TV deals said pay-TV<br />
operators will definitely seek more favorable terms from Al<br />
Jazeera since, &#8220;no one wanted to carry Current TV and they want<br />
to carry an Al Jazeera channel even less.&#8221;</p>
<p>For instance upon learning of deal, which closed on<br />
Wednesday, Time Warner Cable immediately said that it<br />
would terminate its contract with Current TV, meaning its<br />
customers would not be seeing the new network to be named Al<br />
Jazeera America.</p>
<p>On Thursday, however, the company, which ranks as the<br />
nation&#8217;s second largest cable provider with 12 million<br />
subscribers, walked back from that stance a bit.</p>
<p>&#8220;We are keeping an open mind, and as the service develops,<br />
we will evaluate whether it makes sense, for our customers, to<br />
launch the network,&#8221; Time Warner Cable said in a statement.</p>
<p>Al Jazeera has been trying to break into the U.S. cable<br />
market for years, but the network has so far failed to gain<br />
significant distribution largely for political reasons. The<br />
Pan-Arab network had been viewed by many as being anti-American<br />
particularly at the height of the U.S. War in Iraq.</p>
<p>Cable industry sources interpreted that statement to mean<br />
that Time Warner Cable would be open to distributing Al Jazeera<br />
America, just not at the same 12 cents per subscriber per month<br />
that Current TV was receiving, media consultancy firm SNL Kagan<br />
said.</p>
<p>By comparison, SNL Kagan said Fox News averages 89 cents per<br />
subscriber per month, while CNN gets 57 cents and MSNBC collects<br />
18 cents.</p>
<p>Sources said that Dish Network Corp, DirecTV<br />
 and Comcast Corp are locked into programming<br />
deals to carry Current TV for the next few years.</p>
<p>But sources said the distributors, each of which held<br />
ownership stakes in Current TV, plan to re-evaluate their<br />
agreements once they expire.</p>
<p>Dish, run by billionaire Charlie Ergen, is likely to be a<br />
big obstacle that Al Jazeera will have to successfully overcome.</p>
<p>Dish is no stranger to dropping channels.</p>
<p>This past summer, for instance, it blacked out four AMC<br />
Networks channels for roughly four months, and Ergen<br />
regularly uses the company&#8217;s earnings calls to rail against<br />
rising programming costs.</p>
<p>Brean Murray analyst Todd Mitchell said Dish will likely<br />
pounce on the opportunity to renegotiate terms with Al Jazeera,<br />
now that the format and the owner of the channel have changed.</p>
<p>&#8220;Anytime Dish even gets the scent of leverage, something<br />
opens for them to renegotiate, they start to renegotiate,&#8221;<br />
Mitchell said. &#8220;This is the Dish way. Anytime they get a moment<br />
of leverage, they&#8217;ll think &#8216;let me get you for cheaper,&#8217; and<br />
will start negotiating.&#8221;</p>
<p>A Dish spokesman said the carrier &#8220;has ongoing relationships<br />
with both Current TV and Al Jazeera and we are evaluating the<br />
future plans for Current TV.&#8221;</p>
<p>Comcast ranks as the nation&#8217;s largest cable television<br />
provider with about 23 million subscribers. DirecTV, with just<br />
under 20 million subscribers, and Dish Network, with 14 million<br />
subscribers, are the two biggest satellite TV providers. Taken<br />
together, those three companies would account for the vast<br />
majority of the distribution. (Not every subscriber gets Current<br />
TV, as it depends on the programming package they receive.)</p>
<p>The channel will also take over Current TV&#8217;s distribution of<br />
Verizon&#8217;s FiOS and AT&#038;T U-verse, which together have 8.9<br />
million subscribers.</p>
<p>A DirecTV spokesman declined comment. Comcast said it will<br />
continue to carry Current TV as per its affiliate agreement. A<br />
representative for Al Jazeera said nine operators will carry the<br />
new channel, the largest being Comcast, DirecTV, Dish, AT&#038;T and<br />
Verizon.</p>
</p>
<p>PAY TO PLAY</p>
<p>Current TV generated an average nightly audience of just<br />
42,000 viewers, steeply below ratings for Fox News, CNN and<br />
MSNBC, all of which are &#8220;fully distributed,&#8221; meaning they reach<br />
more than 90 percent of the 100 million pay-TV households in the<br />
United States.</p>
<p>Indeed, part of the reason why Current TV has lasted seven<br />
years amid an environment in which low-rated, independently<br />
owned networks of its ilk are being dropped by pay-TV<br />
distributors is because of the influence wielded by its<br />
co-founder, former Vice President Al Gore.</p>
<p>Though Gore will remain an adviser, Al Jazeera America will<br />
be negotiating new distribution deals largely without his<br />
influence.</p>
<p>Sources said that perhaps the only way for Al Jazeera to<br />
prevent being dropped and ensure distribution is to take a page<br />
from Rupert Murdoch, who 15 years ago, paid operators to carry<br />
Fox News after it was created instead of asking them to pay him.<br />
With Qatar&#8217;s financial resources, it reportedly paid a rich $500<br />
million for Current TV, that could be a viable short-term<br />
solution.</p>
<p>&#8220;You can buy your way on. It&#8217;s not unheard of for networks<br />
to pay cable operators to get on,&#8221; said Larry Gerbrandt,<br />
principal of Media Valuation Partners, who added that such a<br />
move wouldn&#8217;t be a long-term strategy.</p>
<p>Al Jazeera has not had to offer money for distribution,<br />
sources said.</p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.reuters.com/peter-lauria/2013/01/04/al-jazeeras-new-channel-struggles-for-u-s-distribution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hollywood sees licensing cash cow in Disney-Netflix deal</title>
		<link>http://in.reuters.com/article/2012/12/07/netflix-studios-licensing-idINDEE8B60CX20121207?feedType=RSS&#038;feedName=everything&#038;virtualBrandChannel=11709</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.reuters.com/peter-lauria/2012/12/07/hollywood-sees-licensing-cash-cow-in-disney-netflix-deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 19:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Lauria</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/peter-lauria/?p=95</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Ronald Grover and Peter Lauria (Reuters) &#8211; Cha-ching! That&#8217;s the sound ringing in the ears of Hollywood studio executives after Walt Disney Co (DIS.N: Quote, Profile, Research) landed a rich deal with Netflix (NFLX.O: Quote, Profile, Research) to stream its movies to television. Netflix&#8217;s arrival as a bidder for the television rights to Hollywood [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Ronald Grover and Peter Lauria</p>
<p>(Reuters) &#8211; Cha-ching!</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the sound ringing in the ears of Hollywood studio executives after Walt Disney Co (DIS.N: <a href="/stocks/quote?symbol=DIS.N">Quote</a>, <a href="/stocks/companyProfile?symbol=DIS.N">Profile</a>, <a href="/stocks/researchReports?symbol=DIS.N">Research</a>) landed a rich deal with Netflix (NFLX.O: <a href="/stocks/quote?symbol=NFLX.O">Quote</a>, <a href="/stocks/companyProfile?symbol=NFLX.O">Profile</a>, <a href="/stocks/researchReports?symbol=NFLX.O">Research</a>) to stream its movies to television.</p>
<p>Netflix&#8217;s arrival as a bidder for the television rights to Hollywood movies means that the studios can now play the company off of traditional pay-TV networks like Time Warner&#8217;s (TWX.N: <a href="/stocks/quote?symbol=TWX.N">Quote</a>, <a href="/stocks/companyProfile?symbol=TWX.N">Profile</a>, <a href="/stocks/researchReports?symbol=TWX.N">Research</a>) HBO to extract higher fees in contract renewal talks.</p>
<p>And Netflix couldn&#8217;t have come along at a better time for the studios, which were being threatened with having their fees slashed by the pay-TV networks who have argued for years that they are better served by investing in original programming than licensing movies.</p>
<p>Netflix isn&#8217;t the only company to emerge on the scene, either. The streaming video ambitions of Amazon.com Inc (AMZN.O: <a href="/stocks/quote?symbol=AMZN.O">Quote</a>, <a href="/stocks/companyProfile?symbol=AMZN.O">Profile</a>, <a href="/stocks/researchReports?symbol=AMZN.O">Research</a>), Google Inc (GOOG.O: <a href="/stocks/quote?symbol=GOOG.O">Quote</a>, <a href="/stocks/companyProfile?symbol=GOOG.O">Profile</a>, <a href="/stocks/researchReports?symbol=GOOG.O">Research</a>) and Apple Inc (AAPL.O: <a href="/stocks/quote?symbol=AAPL.O">Quote</a>, <a href="/stocks/companyProfile?symbol=AAPL.O">Profile</a>, <a href="/stocks/researchReports?symbol=AAPL.O">Research</a>) set the stage for fierce bidding between these technology giants and the pay-TV networks for the rights to bring Hollywood movies into the living room.</p>
<p>Those technology brethren, however, don&#8217;t have the liquidity concerns that, some analysts say, could affect Netflix&#8217;s ability to shoulder the costs.</p>
<p>Under the deal&#8217;s terms, Disney stands to collect an estimated $350 million a year from Netflix for its movies beginning in 2016, according to Janney Montgomery Scott analyst Tony Wible. Disney only earned around $250 million a year under its previous deal with Starz, the cable network in the process of being spun off from Liberty Media (LMCA.O: <a href="/stocks/quote?symbol=LMCA.O">Quote</a>, <a href="/stocks/companyProfile?symbol=LMCA.O">Profile</a>, <a href="/stocks/researchReports?symbol=LMCA.O">Research</a>), Wible said.</p>
<p>Licensing movies for streaming access, whether online or on TV, is an important part of the business model for Hollywood studios given the migration of viewers to tablets and mobiles devices and the secular decline in DVD sales.</p>
<p>That Netflix signed the Disney deal this year but isn&#8217;t getting access to its films until 2016 underscores its aggressiveness and the importance it places on usurping streaming rights to Hollywood films from pay-TV networks.</p>
<p>&#8220;Every other studio is going to want to get in on the action when these kinds of dollars are being offered,&#8221; said former Universal Studios CEO Frank Biondi.</p>
<p>Netflix even has set its sights on Warner Bros, the studio owned by Time Warner. Warner&#8217;s deal with HBO is up in 2014.</p>
<p>&#8220;This gives Warner the opportunity to do other things, to look at this,&#8221; Netflix chief content officer Ted Sarandos told the New York Post.</p>
<p>According to a Reuters source with knowledge of the situation, Netflix is talking to Sony, another studio whose films are distributed by Starz, about a deal similar to the One struck with Disney.</p>
<p>Representatives for Sony and Netflix declined comment.</p>
<p>Comcast-owned (CMCSA.O: <a href="/stocks/quote?symbol=CMCSA.O">Quote</a>, <a href="/stocks/companyProfile?symbol=CMCSA.O">Profile</a>, <a href="/stocks/researchReports?symbol=CMCSA.O">Research</a>) Universal Studios&#8217; deal to license some of its movies to HBO expires in 2016, Biondi noted. Universal already licenses some of its movies to Netflix, including this year&#8217;s surprise hit &#8220;The Lorax,&#8221; to Netflix.</p>
<p>Signs are already emerging of the pressure Netflix can exert. In August, HBO extended its deal with News Corp&#8217;s (NWSA.O: <a href="/stocks/quote?symbol=NWSA.O">Quote</a>, <a href="/stocks/companyProfile?symbol=NWSA.O">Profile</a>, <a href="/stocks/researchReports?symbol=NWSA.O">Research</a>) 20th Century Fox even though it wasn&#8217;t due to expire for three years, Wible said. The new deal gives HBO TV rights to 20th Century Fox movies until 2022, a long-term deal Wible said was designed to keep the studio&#8217;s movies away from Netflix.</p>
<p>PAY UP OR GET OUT</p>
<p>The choice pay-TV networks now face is this: pay up for movie rights or invest that money instead in their own original programming. Some have already slashed licensing budgets, believing movies aren&#8217;t as popular with subscribers as original shows like HBO&#8217;s &#8220;Boardwalk Empire&#8221; or Showtime&#8217;s &#8220;Homeland.&#8221;</p>
<p>Showtime, for instance, tried to cut the prices it was paying Paramount, Universal and MGM for movies by half in 2009, prompting those studios to join forces to launch their own network, EPIX, instead of accept a reduced fee.</p>
<p>&#8220;We changed our strategy a few years back, spent a lot less on motion pictures and more on original production,&#8221; said Les Moonves, CEO of Showtime&#8217;s parent company CBS Corp (CBS.N: <a href="/stocks/quote?symbol=CBS.N">Quote</a>, <a href="/stocks/companyProfile?symbol=CBS.N">Profile</a>, <a href="/stocks/researchReports?symbol=CBS.N">Research</a>), at a media conference in New York on December 4. &#8220;Out of that came &#8216;Dexter,&#8217; came &#8216;Weeds,&#8217; came &#8216;Shameless,&#8217; came &#8216;Californication&#8217; and now came &#8216;Homeland.&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<p>Starz essentially said in a statement that it let Disney&#8217;s movies go &#8211; rather then have them stolen away by Netflix &#8211; to pursue an original programming strategy.</p>
<p>&#8220;Our decision not to extend the agreement for Disney output &#8230; allows us the opportunity to implement our plan to dramatically ramp up our investment in exclusive, premium-quality original series, which will best meet the needs of our distributors and subscribers,&#8221; Starz said.</p>
<p>That strategy allows pay-TV networks to not only lure subscribers with high-quality shows, but also syndicate to TV stations domestically and overseas: collecting licensing fees for their own content rather than paying for others&#8217;.</p>
<p>LIQUIDITY CONCERNS</p>
<p>The Disney deal follows exclusive deals Netflix struck to stream first-run movies from smaller studios like Relativity Media and DreamWorks Animation (DWA.O: <a href="/stocks/quote?symbol=DWA.O">Quote</a>, <a href="/stocks/companyProfile?symbol=DWA.O">Profile</a>, <a href="/stocks/researchReports?symbol=DWA.O">Research</a>), the latter deal costing an estimated $30 million for the rights to films like &#8220;Shrek&#8221; and &#8220;Kung Fu Panda,&#8221; according to Wible.</p>
<p>The deals Netflix has signed have saddled it with nearly $5 billion in commitments to studios over the next three years, according to its filings, prompting some analysts, such as Wedbush Securities&#8217; Michael Pachter, to worry about liquidity.</p>
<p>Netflix needs to spend heavily for newer movies and TV shows to grow its base of 25 million U.S. subscribers, Pachter said.</p>
<p>&#8220;They have Amazon, Google, and Apple breathing down their necks and &lt;those companies&gt; won&#8217;t let them pay less,&#8221; he said. &#8220;Netflix has shown this is a business and they have a lot of potential competitors.&#8221;</p>
<p>Pachter, however, viewed the Disney deal as a positive sign that the studio is confident Netflix will still be operating in 2016, when the deal starts, since some of the money owed under the Disney contract comes due before then.</p>
<p>Still in its early years, Netflix continues to tinker with a business model that started by mailing DVDs. Besides paying hefty amounts for new films, Netflix itself has gotten into original programming, producing such shows as &#8220;Lilyhammer,&#8221; which stars former &#8220;Sopranos&#8221; actor Steven Van Zandt as a former mobster who goes into the witness protection program in Norway. (Additional reporting by Lisa Richwine and Liana Baker; Editing by Nick Zieminski)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.reuters.com/peter-lauria/2012/12/07/hollywood-sees-licensing-cash-cow-in-disney-netflix-deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Analysis: Hollywood sees licensing cash cow in Disney-Netflix deal</title>
		<link>http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/12/07/us-netflix-studios-licensing-idUSBRE8B613420121207?feedType=RSS&#038;feedName=everything&#038;virtualBrandChannel=11563</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.reuters.com/peter-lauria/2012/12/07/analysis-hollywood-sees-licensing-cash-cow-in-disney-netflix-deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 19:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Lauria</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/peter-lauria/?p=93</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Ronald Grover and Peter Lauria (Reuters) &#8211; Cha-ching! That&#8217;s the sound ringing in the ears of Hollywood studio executives after Walt Disney Co landed a rich deal with Netflix to stream its movies to television. Netflix&#8217;s arrival as a bidder for the television rights to Hollywood movies means that the studios can now play [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By <a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/search/journalist.php?edition=us&#038;n=Ronald.Grover">Ronald Grover</a> and <a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/search/journalist.php?edition=us&#038;n=Peter.Lauria">Peter Lauria</a></p>
<p>(Reuters) &#8211; Cha-ching!</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the sound ringing in the ears of Hollywood studio executives after Walt Disney Co landed a rich deal with Netflix to stream its movies to television.</p>
<p>Netflix&#8217;s arrival as a bidder for the television rights to Hollywood movies means that the studios can now play the company off of traditional pay-TV networks like Time Warner&#8217;s HBO to extract higher fees in contract renewal talks.</p>
<p>And Netflix couldn&#8217;t have come along at a better time for the studios, which were being threatened with having their fees slashed by the pay-TV networks who have argued for years that they are better served by investing in original programming than licensing movies.</p>
<p>Netflix isn&#8217;t the only company to emerge on the scene, either. The streaming video ambitions of Amazon.com Inc, Google Inc and Apple Inc set the stage for fierce bidding between these technology giants and the pay-TV networks for the rights to bring Hollywood movies into the living room.</p>
<p>Those technology brethren, however, don&#8217;t have the liquidity concerns that, some analysts say, could affect Netflix&#8217;s ability to shoulder the costs.</p>
<p>Under the deal&#8217;s terms, Disney stands to collect an estimated $350 million a year from Netflix for its movies beginning in 2016, according to Janney Montgomery Scott analyst Tony Wible. Disney only earned around $250 million a year under its previous deal with Starz, the cable network in the process of being spun off from Liberty Media, Wible said.</p>
<p>Licensing movies for streaming access, whether online or on TV, is an important part of the business model for Hollywood studios given the migration of viewers to tablets and mobiles devices and the secular decline in DVD sales.</p>
<p>That Netflix signed the Disney deal this year but isn&#8217;t getting access to its films until 2016 underscores its aggressiveness and the importance it places on usurping streaming rights to Hollywood films from pay-TV networks.</p>
<p>&#8220;Every other studio is going to want to get in on the action when these kinds of dollars are being offered,&#8221; said former Universal Studios CEO Frank Biondi.</p>
<p>Netflix even has set its sights on Warner Bros, the studio owned by Time Warner. Warner&#8217;s deal with HBO is up in 2014.</p>
<p>&#8220;This gives Warner the opportunity to do other things, to look at this,&#8221; Netflix chief content officer Ted Sarandos told the New York Post.</p>
<p>According to a Reuters source with knowledge of the situation, Netflix is talking to Sony, another studio whose films are distributed by Starz, about a deal similar to the One struck with Disney.</p>
<p>Representatives for Sony and Netflix declined comment.</p>
<p>Comcast-owned Universal Studios&#8217; deal to license some of its movies to HBO expires in 2016, Biondi noted. Universal already licenses some of its movies to Netflix, including this year&#8217;s surprise hit &#8220;The Lorax,&#8221; to Netflix.</p>
<p>Signs are already emerging of the pressure Netflix can exert. In August, HBO extended its deal with News Corp&#8217;s 20th Century Fox even though it wasn&#8217;t due to expire for three years, Wible said. The new deal gives HBO TV rights to 20th Century Fox movies until 2022, a long-term deal Wible said was designed to keep the studio&#8217;s movies away from Netflix.</p>
<p>PAY UP OR GET OUT</p>
<p>The choice pay-TV networks now face is this: pay up for movie rights or invest that money instead in their own original programming. Some have already slashed licensing budgets, believing movies aren&#8217;t as popular with subscribers as original shows like HBO&#8217;s &#8220;Boardwalk Empire&#8221; or Showtime&#8217;s &#8220;Homeland.&#8221;</p>
<p>Showtime, for instance, tried to cut the prices it was paying Paramount, Universal and MGM for movies by half in 2009, prompting those studios to join forces to launch their own network, EPIX, instead of accept a reduced fee.</p>
<p>&#8220;We changed our strategy a few years back, spent a lot less on motion pictures and more on original production,&#8221; said Les Moonves, CEO of Showtime&#8217;s parent company CBS Corp, at a media conference in New York on December 4. &#8220;Out of that came &#8216;Dexter,&#8217; came &#8216;Weeds,&#8217; came &#8216;Shameless,&#8217; came &#8216;Californication&#8217; and now came &#8216;Homeland.&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<p>Starz essentially said in a statement that it let Disney&#8217;s movies go &#8211; rather than have them stolen away by Netflix &#8211; to pursue an original programming strategy.</p>
<p>&#8220;Our decision not to extend the agreement for Disney output &#8230; allows us the opportunity to implement our plan to dramatically ramp up our investment in exclusive, premium-quality original series, which will best meet the needs of our distributors and subscribers,&#8221; Starz said.</p>
<p>That strategy allows pay-TV networks to not only lure subscribers with high-quality shows, but also syndicate to TV stations domestically and overseas: collecting licensing fees for their own content rather than paying for others&#8217;.</p>
<p>LIQUIDITY CONCERNS</p>
<p>The Disney deal follows exclusive deals Netflix struck to stream first-run movies from smaller studios like Relativity Media and DreamWorks Animation, the latter deal costing an estimated $30 million for the rights to films like &#8220;Shrek&#8221; and &#8220;Kung Fu Panda,&#8221; according to Wible.</p>
<p>The deals Netflix has signed have saddled it with nearly $5 billion in commitments to studios over the next three years, according to its filings, prompting some analysts, such as Wedbush Securities&#8217; Michael Pachter, to worry about liquidity.</p>
<p>Netflix needs to spend heavily for newer movies and TV shows to grow its base of 25 million U.S. subscribers, Pachter said.</p>
<p>&#8220;They have Amazon, Google, and Apple breathing down their necks and won&#8217;t let them pay less,&#8221; he said. &#8220;Netflix has shown this is a business and they have a lot of potential competitors.&#8221;</p>
<p>Pachter, however, viewed the Disney deal as a positive sign that the studio is confident Netflix will still be operating in 2016, when the deal starts, since some of the money owed under the Disney contract comes due before then.</p>
<p>Still in its early years, Netflix continues to tinker with a business model that started by mailing DVDs. Besides paying hefty amounts for new films, Netflix itself has gotten into original programming, producing such shows as &#8220;Lilyhammer,&#8221; which stars former &#8220;Sopranos&#8221; actor Steven Van Zandt as a former mobster who goes into the witness protection program in Norway.</p>
<p>(Additional reporting by Lisa Richwine and Liana Baker; Editing by Nick Zieminski)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.reuters.com/peter-lauria/2012/12/07/analysis-hollywood-sees-licensing-cash-cow-in-disney-netflix-deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Former NBC executive Jeff Zucker named CNN president</title>
		<link>http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/11/29/cnn-zucker-idUSL1E8MT45M20121129?feedType=RSS&#038;feedName=everything&#038;virtualBrandChannel=11563</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.reuters.com/peter-lauria/2012/11/29/former-nbc-executive-jeff-zucker-named-cnn-president/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 16:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Lauria</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/peter-lauria/?p=91</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nov 29 (Reuters) &#8211; Time Warner Inc said on Thursday Jeff Zucker would be president of its cable news network, CNN Worldwide, beginning in January. Zucker, former head of NBCUniversal and current producer of Katie Couric&#8217;s talk show &#8220;Katie,&#8221; will succeed Jim Walton, and will report to Phil Kent, chairman and CEO of CNN parent [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nov 29 (Reuters) &#8211; Time Warner Inc said on Thursday<br />
Jeff Zucker would be president of its cable news network, CNN<br />
Worldwide, beginning in January.</p>
<p>Zucker, former head of NBCUniversal and current producer of<br />
Katie Couric&#8217;s talk show &#8220;Katie,&#8221; will succeed Jim Walton, and<br />
will report to Phil Kent, chairman and CEO of CNN parent<br />
company, Turner Broadcasting System. Walton had said in July he<br />
was leaving the network.</p>
<p>&#8220;Outside of my family and the Miami Dolphins, there is<br />
nothing I am as passionate about as journalism,&#8221; said Zucker in<br />
a statement. &#8220;I spent the most rewarding years of my career as a<br />
journalist.&#8221;</p>
<p>Zucker, who will be based at CNN in New York, gained a<br />
reputation as a news-producing whiz when he worked with Couric<br />
on NBC&#8217;s &#8220;Today&#8221; show.</p>
<p>He remained involved in decisions about programming and the<br />
strategic direction of NBC News, MSNBC and CNBC even after he<br />
was named CEO of NBCUniversal, a source close to him told<br />
Reuters earlier this week, when news first broke of his imminent<br />
appointment at CNN.</p>
<p>Zucker was heavily involved in a decision to move MSNBC hard<br />
left to counter Fox News, the source told Reuters, though that<br />
didn&#8217;t imply he would move CNN in a more partisan direction.</p>
<p>Since its beginnings as the first 24-hour cable news<br />
network, CNN has tried to hold the middle ground in its news<br />
coverage, a position that some blame for an erosion of its<br />
ratings.</p>
<p>As CNN&#8217;s viewership declined, ratings increased for rivals<br />
Fox News and MSNBC, which blend news with opinion and political<br />
commentary.</p>
<p>CNN has lagged Fox News Channel and MSNBC in prime-time<br />
viewers for more than a year. On a regular news night, CNN draws<br />
fewer than 1 million U.S. prime-time viewers, compared with<br />
about 2.7 million for Fox News Channel and about 1.5 million<br />
viewers for MSNBC, according to ratings data.</p>
<p>Zucker is now tasked with improving the performance of a<br />
network that saw its prime time ratings hit a 21-year low during<br />
the second quarter of this year.</p>
<p>Though CNN remains profitable, Chief Executive Jeff Bewkes<br />
of Time Warner, the parent company of Turner and CNN, said in<br />
August he was unsatisfied with the network&#8217;s low ratings and<br />
that he would seek to turn it around with more compelling<br />
programming that would remain non-partisan.</p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.reuters.com/peter-lauria/2012/11/29/former-nbc-executive-jeff-zucker-named-cnn-president/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
