Comments on: London’s burning… well it could have been http://blogs.reuters.com/photo/2007/11/12/londons-burning-well-it-could-have-been/ What makes a great picture? Mon, 09 Nov 2009 11:17:14 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: - http://blogs.reuters.com/photo/2007/11/12/londons-burning-well-it-could-have-been/#comment-336478 - Sun, 12 Oct 2008 21:09:52 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/photo/2007/11/12/londons-burning-well-it-could-have-been/#comment-336478 You're wrong actually - that cloud of smoke came from Hemel Hemsptead - Buncefield Oil Depot. Get your facts straight. You’re wrong actually - that cloud of smoke came from Hemel Hemsptead - Buncefield Oil Depot. Get your facts straight.

]]> By: Pablo Puga http://blogs.reuters.com/photo/2007/11/12/londons-burning-well-it-could-have-been/#comment-332098 Pablo Puga Tue, 13 Nov 2007 22:35:35 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/photo/2007/11/12/londons-burning-well-it-could-have-been/#comment-332098 Hi, almost everyday I log on to http://www.reuters.com/news/pictures and get to see the editor's choice pictures and the other slide shows. I constantly read this blog too. Today, in the editors choice, you can see in picture 15 of "REUTERS/John Voos" the original photo (I suppose) of the one that starts this post, but without the crop. In the original one at the "Editor's Choice" photos of today, you can see two SENSOR DUST spots on the sky of the photo. This is a shame. This is the first time I get to notice something like this in so great photos the editor's choose. May be a clean version of the photo could be better, and removing those spots doesn't change the reality of the London scene, but makes a better photo. Thanks, good post and great other photos indeed. Pablo Puga Hi, almost everyday I log on to http://www.reuters.com/news/pictures and get to see the editor’s choice pictures and the other slide shows. I constantly read this blog too.

Today, in the editors choice, you can see in picture 15 of “REUTERS/John Voos” the original photo (I suppose) of the one that starts this post, but without the crop. In the original one at the “Editor’s Choice” photos of today, you can see two SENSOR DUST spots on the sky of the photo. This is a shame.

This is the first time I get to notice something like this in so great photos the editor’s choose. May be a clean version of the photo could be better, and removing those spots doesn’t change the reality of the London scene, but makes a better photo.

Thanks, good post and great other photos indeed.

Pablo Puga

]]> By: fotowarung.bazuki.com » Blog Archive » London’s burning… well it could have been http://blogs.reuters.com/photo/2007/11/12/londons-burning-well-it-could-have-been/#comment-332094 fotowarung.bazuki.com » Blog Archive » London’s burning… well it could have been Mon, 12 Nov 2007 22:05:20 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/photo/2007/11/12/londons-burning-well-it-could-have-been/#comment-332094 [...] London’s burning… well it could have beenMy second pair of eyes“..embers and ash fall from above like hellish snow”A postcard from Singapore VINice and easy does itMutual RespectAmbushed by the Taliban in AfghanistanNotes from a wildfire“My God this fire came right through my neighborhood”The hope of change in Iraq [...] [...] London’s burning… well it could have beenMy second pair of eyes“..embers and ash fall from above like hellish snow”A postcard from Singapore VINice and easy does itMutual RespectAmbushed by the Taliban in AfghanistanNotes from a wildfire“My God this fire came right through my neighborhood”The hope of change in Iraq [...]

]]>