<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: London&#8217;s burning&#8230; well it could have been</title>
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/photo/2007/11/12/londons-burning-well-it-could-have-been/</link>
	<description>What makes a great picture?</description>
	<pubDate>Sun,  6 Jul 2008 21:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pablo Puga</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/photo/2007/11/12/londons-burning-well-it-could-have-been/#comment-332098</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablo Puga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 22:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.reuters.com/photo/2007/11/12/londons-burning-well-it-could-have-been/#comment-332098</guid>
		<description>Hi, almost everyday I log on to http://www.reuters.com/news/pictures and get to see the editor's choice pictures and the other slide shows. I constantly read this blog too.

Today, in the editors choice, you can see in picture 15 of "REUTERS/John Voos" the original photo (I suppose) of the one that starts this post, but without the crop. In the original one at the "Editor's Choice" photos of today, you can see  two SENSOR DUST spots on the sky of the photo. This is a shame.

This is the first time I get to notice something like this in so great photos the editor's choose. May be a clean version of the photo could be better, and removing those spots doesn't change the reality of the London scene, but makes a better photo.

Thanks, good post and great other photos indeed.

Pablo Puga</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, almost everyday I log on to <a href="http://www.reuters.com/news/pictures" rel="nofollow">http://www.reuters.com/news/pictures</a> and get to see the editor&#8217;s choice pictures and the other slide shows. I constantly read this blog too.</p>
<p>Today, in the editors choice, you can see in picture 15 of &#8220;REUTERS/John Voos&#8221; the original photo (I suppose) of the one that starts this post, but without the crop. In the original one at the &#8220;Editor&#8217;s Choice&#8221; photos of today, you can see  two SENSOR DUST spots on the sky of the photo. This is a shame.</p>
<p>This is the first time I get to notice something like this in so great photos the editor&#8217;s choose. May be a clean version of the photo could be better, and removing those spots doesn&#8217;t change the reality of the London scene, but makes a better photo.</p>
<p>Thanks, good post and great other photos indeed.</p>
<p>Pablo Puga</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fotowarung.bazuki.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; London’s burning… well it could have been</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/photo/2007/11/12/londons-burning-well-it-could-have-been/#comment-332094</link>
		<dc:creator>fotowarung.bazuki.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; London’s burning… well it could have been</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 22:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.reuters.com/photo/2007/11/12/londons-burning-well-it-could-have-been/#comment-332094</guid>
		<description>[...] London’s burning… well it could have beenMy second pair of eyes“..embers and ash fall from above like hellish snow”A postcard from Singapore VINice and easy does itMutual RespectAmbushed by the Taliban in AfghanistanNotes from a wildfire“My God this fire came right through my neighborhood”The hope of change in Iraq [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] London’s burning… well it could have beenMy second pair of eyes“..embers and ash fall from above like hellish snow”A postcard from Singapore VINice and easy does itMutual RespectAmbushed by the Taliban in AfghanistanNotes from a wildfire“My God this fire came right through my neighborhood”The hope of change in Iraq [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
