Reuters Blogs

Photographers

What makes a great picture?

05:31 December 13th, 2007

AP photographer in first Iraq court hearing

Posted by: David Viggers
Tags: Reuters Photographers

I reproduce this Reuters update on the case of Iraqi AP photographer Bilal Hussein for anyone who may not have seen it earlier in the week.

BAGHDAD (Reuters) - An Iraqi judge convened the first criminal hearing on Sunday against an Associated Press photographer who has been detained by the U.S. military without charges for nearly 20 months, the news agency said.

The U.S. military has accused Bilal Hussein, a 36-year-old Iraqi, of working with insurgents in Iraq. He was seized in April 2006 in Ramadi, capital of western Anbar province.

The award-winning photographer was present for most of the nearly seven-hour, closed-door proceeding in the Central Criminal Court of Iraq, the AP said in a report from Baghdad.

It was the first time Hussein or his lawyers had seen any of the materials gathered by the U.S. military against him since his arrest, the news agency said.

Magistrate Dhia al-Kinani ordered that the proceedings and details of materials presented remain secret, the AP said.

Hussein’s lawyer, Paul Gardephe, said no formal charges were lodged. Gardephe was permitted to see some material during the proceeding but was forbidden from taking any copies with him to aid in building his defence, the AP said.

“There is still no formal charge against Bilal, and The Associated Press continues to believe that Bilal Hussein was a photojournalist working in a war zone and that claims that he is involved with insurgent activities are false,” AP spokesman Paul Colford said in a statement, according to the report.

“Because the judge ordered that the proceedings today be kept secret, we are restricted from saying anything further.”

The agency had said the U.S. military would submit evidence to the Iraqi judiciary on December 9. 

PULITZER PRIZE

The AP has repeatedly called for the immediate release of Hussein, who was part of its photo team that won a Pulitzer prize in 2005.

It has said that under Iraqi law, an investigative judge would review the evidence and decide whether to dismiss the case or send it to a three-member court for trial.

AP President and Chief Executive Officer Tom Curley has written to Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki, expressing concern that Hussein’s lawyer had not been given enough time and information to prepare his defence.

The U.S. military has said Hussein was detained for possessing material used to make roadside bombs, insurgent propaganda, and what it described as a surveillance photo of a coalition installation.

U.S. military spokesman Major-General Kevin Bergner said last month that Hussein’s case had been reviewed several times by a board that periodically reviews the files of detainees. Hussein was still deemed a “security threat”, he said.

Hussein is one of several Iraqi journalists who have been held by the U.S. military without being charged. Iraqi journalists working for Reuters have also been detained by the U.S. military for months and later released without charges.

(Writing by Dean Yates; editing by Ralph Boulton)
 

2 comments so far

[...] AP photographer in first Iraq court hearingJubo!The Devil is in the detailsOn the skidsRed mistFly driveBack in Baghdad; a first lookNigel nails it!She never calls: Wannabes - an updateDeliberate distortion [...]

- Posted by fotowarung.bazuki.com » Blog Archive » AP photographer in first Iraq court hearing

The article says that “Hussein is one of several Iraqi journalists who have been held by the U.S. military without being charged.” If that’s the case, why shouldn’t the Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki do something about it?

If AP maintains that “Bilal Hussein was a photojournalist working in a war zone and that claims that he is involved with insurgent activities are false,” then why is the U.S. military is still holding him without charges? Or is it because its a super power in a war torn country? A war they themselves instigated? Can’t they be brought to book for the human rights abuses they continue to perpetrate in the name of fighting “insurgency” and “terrorism” they claim to be in Iraq?

Shouldn’t they have enough/sufficient evidence? And if it is true that they have the evidence they say they have against Bilal Hussein, isn’t it standard procedure to give copies of the same to the defence or at least allow them access??

- Posted by Diana Ngila

Post Your Comment

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word

House Rules:
  • We moderate all comments and will publish everything that advances the post directly or with relevant tangential information
  • We try not to publish comments that we think are offensive or appear to pass you off as another person, and we will be conservative if comments may be considered libelous information.