<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Overfile or additional content?</title>
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/photo/2008/01/11/overfile-or-additional-content/</link>
	<description>What makes a great picture?</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 10:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mani Rana</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/photo/2008/01/11/overfile-or-additional-content/#comment-334750</link>
		<dc:creator>Mani Rana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 10:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.reuters.com/photo/2008/01/11/overfile-or-additional-content/#comment-334750</guid>
		<description>i think it called waves in photography you are making. Shooters needs to keep an eye on every moment with all way
Bohth photos are the need of photo editor and hard to chose one of them 
in my opinion photo is miss or hit nothing else</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think it called waves in photography you are making. Shooters needs to keep an eye on every moment with all way<br />
Bohth photos are the need of photo editor and hard to chose one of them<br />
in my opinion photo is miss or hit nothing else</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diana Ngila</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/photo/2008/01/11/overfile-or-additional-content/#comment-332553</link>
		<dc:creator>Diana Ngila</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.reuters.com/photo/2008/01/11/overfile-or-additional-content/#comment-332553</guid>
		<description>Well, I think both images are necessary. It depends on what you want to potray.
As for the order in which they were taken, I'd say, the second was taken first and the other followed.

The second shows Depp's fans clamouring for his attention as though he has just walked to where they are (see the lady in the background-the one who seems to be yelling)

In the first image the fans in the background look somewhat satisfied as opposed to those in the second picture as in order of appearance.
I don't know if am making sense...but I think the first in order of appearance was actually second and the second image was taken first.

As for real commercial value, isn't time supposed to tell?
Right or not?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I think both images are necessary. It depends on what you want to potray.<br />
As for the order in which they were taken, I&#8217;d say, the second was taken first and the other followed.</p>
<p>The second shows Depp&#8217;s fans clamouring for his attention as though he has just walked to where they are (see the lady in the background-the one who seems to be yelling)</p>
<p>In the first image the fans in the background look somewhat satisfied as opposed to those in the second picture as in order of appearance.<br />
I don&#8217;t know if am making sense&#8230;but I think the first in order of appearance was actually second and the second image was taken first.</p>
<p>As for real commercial value, isn&#8217;t time supposed to tell?<br />
Right or not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Ison</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/photo/2008/01/11/overfile-or-additional-content/#comment-332537</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Ison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 05:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.reuters.com/photo/2008/01/11/overfile-or-additional-content/#comment-332537</guid>
		<description>Mr Russell Boyce, 

As one who commissioned a photo shoot of yours 26 years ago ,it is good to see that you are still making waves,and that you are (slightly) farther east than myself. 

Best Regards

Charles(ofIVC)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr Russell Boyce, </p>
<p>As one who commissioned a photo shoot of yours 26 years ago ,it is good to see that you are still making waves,and that you are (slightly) farther east than myself. </p>
<p>Best Regards</p>
<p>Charles(ofIVC)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomas Stargardter</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/photo/2008/01/11/overfile-or-additional-content/#comment-332531</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomas Stargardter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 18:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.reuters.com/photo/2008/01/11/overfile-or-additional-content/#comment-332531</guid>
		<description>As a photo editor who has to look at over 3000 images from the wire services on a daily basis plus our own production, I would expect that Reuters shooters would know how to edit their work.  When it was film and expensive phone line transmissions it was a must.  Today with an information over kill it is a necessity.  Do your job so that I can do mine.  Overfile?  It is not a valid question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a photo editor who has to look at over 3000 images from the wire services on a daily basis plus our own production, I would expect that Reuters shooters would know how to edit their work.  When it was film and expensive phone line transmissions it was a must.  Today with an information over kill it is a necessity.  Do your job so that I can do mine.  Overfile?  It is not a valid question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2008-01-12 &#124; TrentHead.Com</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/photo/2008/01/11/overfile-or-additional-content/#comment-332520</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2008-01-12 &#124; TrentHead.Com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 12:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.reuters.com/photo/2008/01/11/overfile-or-additional-content/#comment-332520</guid>
		<description>[...] Overfile or additional content? - Reuters Photographers (tags: photojournalism) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Overfile or additional content? - Reuters Photographers (tags: photojournalism) [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell Boyce</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/photo/2008/01/11/overfile-or-additional-content/#comment-332517</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell Boyce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 07:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.reuters.com/photo/2008/01/11/overfile-or-additional-content/#comment-332517</guid>
		<description>The first and second was the order of appearence in the blog not the order that they were taken. But your point also raises the question as to which of these two should be filed first?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first and second was the order of appearence in the blog not the order that they were taken. But your point also raises the question as to which of these two should be filed first?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fotowarung.bazuki.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Overfile or additional content?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/photo/2008/01/11/overfile-or-additional-content/#comment-332514</link>
		<dc:creator>fotowarung.bazuki.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Overfile or additional content?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 23:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.reuters.com/photo/2008/01/11/overfile-or-additional-content/#comment-332514</guid>
		<description>[...] Overfile or additional content?From bangs to flash - the tale of a wannabe photographerThe signs are good…Riding a bicycle in BeijingMonday, MondayClassical gasBehind the maskBack on the Iowa campaign trail24 hour party peopleOn the campaign trail [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Overfile or additional content?From bangs to flash - the tale of a wannabe photographerThe signs are good…Riding a bicycle in BeijingMonday, MondayClassical gasBehind the maskBack on the Iowa campaign trail24 hour party peopleOn the campaign trail [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clemente</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/photo/2008/01/11/overfile-or-additional-content/#comment-332511</link>
		<dc:creator>Clemente</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 19:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.reuters.com/photo/2008/01/11/overfile-or-additional-content/#comment-332511</guid>
		<description>Unless your photographer's moving faster than Depp, you have called the photograph taken second, "first".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unless your photographer&#8217;s moving faster than Depp, you have called the photograph taken second, &#8220;first&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2008-01-11 &#124; TrentHead.Com</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/photo/2008/01/11/overfile-or-additional-content/#comment-332509</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2008-01-11 &#124; TrentHead.Com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 16:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.reuters.com/photo/2008/01/11/overfile-or-additional-content/#comment-332509</guid>
		<description>[...] Overfile or additional content? - Reuters Photographers (tags: photojournalism) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Overfile or additional content? - Reuters Photographers (tags: photojournalism) [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
