Comments on: London’s burning… well it could have been http://blogs.reuters.com/photographers-blog/2007/11/12/londons-burning-well-it-could-have-been/ What makes a great picture? Fri, 24 May 2013 09:21:57 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2 By: chrismoranec http://blogs.reuters.com/photographers-blog/2007/11/12/londons-burning-well-it-could-have-been/comment-page-1/#comment-354336 chrismoranec Wed, 10 Apr 2013 16:39:36 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/photo/2007/11/12/londons-burning-well-it-could-have-been/#comment-354336 This is just the "Official Story" Captain Jack Harkness, and The Doctor actually saved all of London and Earth, from an evil coalition of invading Daleks and Cybermen. That's the truth of it. This is just the “Official Story”
Captain Jack Harkness, and The Doctor actually saved all of London and Earth, from an evil coalition of invading Daleks and Cybermen.
That’s the truth of it.

]]> By: - http://blogs.reuters.com/photographers-blog/2007/11/12/londons-burning-well-it-could-have-been/comment-page-1/#comment-336478 - Sun, 12 Oct 2008 21:09:52 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/photo/2007/11/12/londons-burning-well-it-could-have-been/#comment-336478 You're wrong actually - that cloud of smoke came from Hemel Hemsptead - Buncefield Oil Depot. Get your facts straight. You’re wrong actually – that cloud of smoke came from Hemel Hemsptead – Buncefield Oil Depot. Get your facts straight.

]]> By: Pablo Puga http://blogs.reuters.com/photographers-blog/2007/11/12/londons-burning-well-it-could-have-been/comment-page-1/#comment-332098 Pablo Puga Tue, 13 Nov 2007 22:35:35 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/photo/2007/11/12/londons-burning-well-it-could-have-been/#comment-332098 Hi, almost everyday I log on to http://www.reuters.com/news/pictures and get to see the editor's choice pictures and the other slide shows. I constantly read this blog too. Today, in the editors choice, you can see in picture 15 of "REUTERS/John Voos" the original photo (I suppose) of the one that starts this post, but without the crop. In the original one at the "Editor's Choice" photos of today, you can see two SENSOR DUST spots on the sky of the photo. This is a shame. This is the first time I get to notice something like this in so great photos the editor's choose. May be a clean version of the photo could be better, and removing those spots doesn't change the reality of the London scene, but makes a better photo. Thanks, good post and great other photos indeed. Pablo Puga Hi, almost everyday I log on to http://www.reuters.com/news/pictures and get to see the editor’s choice pictures and the other slide shows. I constantly read this blog too.

Today, in the editors choice, you can see in picture 15 of “REUTERS/John Voos” the original photo (I suppose) of the one that starts this post, but without the crop. In the original one at the “Editor’s Choice” photos of today, you can see two SENSOR DUST spots on the sky of the photo. This is a shame.

This is the first time I get to notice something like this in so great photos the editor’s choose. May be a clean version of the photo could be better, and removing those spots doesn’t change the reality of the London scene, but makes a better photo.

Thanks, good post and great other photos indeed.

Pablo Puga

]]>