Comments on: 4.25 – who values a news picture?

By: Asanga

Asanga — Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:53:07 +0000

There was a lot of doubt earlier when loads of media networks started reporting that the terrorist leader was dead. Most people said that he was not dead & that the violance which shook the country will still continue even after the war. However after looking back a long time after the war it is evidant that it is over for good & that the terrorist leader is dead.
I guess this pictures would really be the evidence for the future to show the end of horrors.

By: krishnamurthir

krishnamurthir — Thu, 25 Jun 2009 10:52:39 +0000

Who sees,view of these photos are debatable topic.As far as i am concerned, i used to see all natural,technical,innovative products,historical monuments, and any latest taken photos from all media networks.Yesterday,night, i discussed about world Top 25 cities photos with my wife and with my known friends.All your pictures are worth to see,worth to comment and worth to save for further brainy works.

By: krishnamurthi ramachandran

krishnamurthi ramachandran — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 16:06:34 +0000

I have a habit of seeing these Photographers-Blog Ar,then i came to arrive lot of proper conclusions of happenings in and around the world.These above photos are very touchy and appreciable.Thanks for publishing of these updates.

By: krishnamurthi ramachandran

krishnamurthi ramachandran — Fri, 12 Jun 2009 09:44:54 +0000

Major Newspapers,magazines,websites, and many government agencies have proclaimed about Mr.Prabhakaran!s death by massive ways.Till today, some political bodies says that He is alive.When all well known news,media net work team are not able to say correctly,what happened to him,whether he is alive or died by shooting, or suicide.I think that , in one day or other,we will come to know about his history.

By: KR

KR — Tue, 09 Jun 2009 11:51:49 +0000

The Reuters Financial colleague who got ‘awe struck’ by the picture cannot be an official endorser, as the article implies, since even most journalists have not met Prabhakaran in real life. However, since this is the first time an “open-wound” picture was published it generates more questions.- The real Prabhakaran have thick straight hair with no receding hairline (refer to recent hat-less pictures). The picture implies him having curls and a receding hairline around forehead- The picture implies that the corpse is clean shaven- There are no trauma in the face from the fatal attack and that could imply that the wound was caused by a post-death (using a machete) act. Also there are no blood stains beyond and aorund the wound. Was someone kind enough to clean him up and shave before photographers arrived?I understand these are theories that’ll go unanswered, unless the real man himself declare his demise or comes alive one day.