Comments on: True or false? http://blogs.reuters.com/photographers-blog/2010/12/23/true-or-false/ What makes a great picture? Tue, 21 May 2013 16:31:37 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2 By: granjapix http://blogs.reuters.com/photographers-blog/2010/12/23/true-or-false/comment-page-1/#comment-346805 granjapix Sun, 22 May 2011 13:54:35 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/photo/?p=18353#comment-346805 Hard to be objective if you are not on the site. You have all the secuence to determinate so, I would like to know how was the original caption of that pic. Any way good job showing them on context. Hard to be objective if you are not on the site. You have all the secuence to determinate so, I would like to know how was the original caption of that pic. Any way good job showing them on context.

]]> By: Photoluc http://blogs.reuters.com/photographers-blog/2010/12/23/true-or-false/comment-page-1/#comment-346331 Photoluc Fri, 24 Dec 2010 01:52:05 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/photo/?p=18353#comment-346331 Wait, so if I understand correctly, the newspaper made the same mistake that the policeman who beat the guy with the transceiver: they thought he was a protester, not a policeman. If a policeman makes the mistake, isn't it comprehensible the newspaper did the same? I mean, when I see a policeman beating a guy, I too immediately think that the guy is not a policeman - the idea of a policeman beating his colleague doesn't immediately jump to my head. What did the caption of the photo said anyway? Did it correctly identify the transceiver guy as a policeman? If it's the case and the newspaper ignored the caption on purpose, they I agree with you, they twisted the truth. So please post the original caption, can you? Lucas http://www.pictobank.com Wait, so if I understand correctly, the newspaper made the same mistake that the policeman who beat the guy with the transceiver: they thought he was a protester, not a policeman. If a policeman makes the mistake, isn’t it comprehensible the newspaper did the same? I mean, when I see a policeman beating a guy, I too immediately think that the guy is not a policeman – the idea of a policeman beating his colleague doesn’t immediately jump to my head.

What did the caption of the photo said anyway? Did it correctly identify the transceiver guy as a policeman? If it’s the case and the newspaper ignored the caption on purpose, they I agree with you, they twisted the truth. So please post the original caption, can you?

Lucas
http://www.pictobank.com

]]>