Comments on: True or false? http://blogs.reuters.com/photographers-blog/2010/12/23/true-or-false/ What makes a great picture? Thu, 18 Aug 2016 11:13:37 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.5 By: granjapix http://blogs.reuters.com/photographers-blog/2010/12/23/true-or-false/comment-page-1/#comment-346805 Sun, 22 May 2011 13:54:35 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/photo/?p=18353#comment-346805 Hard to be objective if you are not on the site. You have all the secuence to determinate so, I would like to know how was the original caption of that pic. Any way good job showing them on context.

]]>
By: Photoluc http://blogs.reuters.com/photographers-blog/2010/12/23/true-or-false/comment-page-1/#comment-346331 Fri, 24 Dec 2010 01:52:05 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/photo/?p=18353#comment-346331 Wait, so if I understand correctly, the newspaper made the same mistake that the policeman who beat the guy with the transceiver: they thought he was a protester, not a policeman. If a policeman makes the mistake, isn’t it comprehensible the newspaper did the same? I mean, when I see a policeman beating a guy, I too immediately think that the guy is not a policeman – the idea of a policeman beating his colleague doesn’t immediately jump to my head.

What did the caption of the photo said anyway? Did it correctly identify the transceiver guy as a policeman? If it’s the case and the newspaper ignored the caption on purpose, they I agree with you, they twisted the truth. So please post the original caption, can you?

Lucas
http://www.pictobank.com

]]>