Opinion

Reihan Salam

Why New Jersey and Virginia matter to the GOP — and its future with black voters

By Reihan Salam
November 1, 2013

Next week’s election will be an important one for the future of the GOP. In New Jersey, Republican Gov. Chris Christie is up for re-election, and by all accounts he is set to defeat his Democratic opponent, state Sen. Barbara Buono, by a wide margin. Christie is widely considered a serious candidate for the Republican presidential nomination in 2016, and his ability to win support among independents and Democrats in his home state will be a central part of his appeal.

But in Virginia, it increasingly looks as though Terry McAuliffe, an entrepreneur and investor best known as a political ally of former President Bill Clinton, will defeat Ken Cuccinelli, a staunch conservative much admired by the Tea Party right. At least some conservative activists saw Cuccinelli, who as Virginia’s attorney general played a leading role in constitutional challenges against the Affordable Care Act and other Obama administration initiatives, as a potential presidential contender. A bruising defeat against McAuliffe will put an end to such talk.

There are many things that separate Christie from Cuccinelli. Having served as governor for the better part of the last four years, Christie is a familiar figure. He began his tenure with a series of polarizing confrontations with New Jersey’s powerful public employee unions, yet he has spent the last year on a more conciliatory note, motivated in part by a desire to help his state recover from the damage wrought by Hurricane Sandy. In a heavily Democratic state, Christie has distanced himself from congressional Republicans, and he has framed himself as a pragmatic reformer who stands above the political fray. This position is particularly valuable in light of parlous state of the GOP brand. The most recent NBC/Wall Street Journal poll finds that the Republican party now has a 22 percent positive rating and a 53 percent negative rating across the country, and it’s a safe bet that the picture is even worse in New Jersey.

Cuccinelli, unlike Christie, has long been an unapologetically ideological conservative, and in the wake of the government shutdown, Democrats have succeeded in characterizing him as politically extreme. Whereas Virginia’s current governor, Republican Bob McDonnell, fought his Democratic opponent to a standstill in northern Virginia’s populous suburbs, Cuccinelli is running far behind Cuccinelli in this same all-important region.

There is one difference between Christie and Cuccinelli that has yet to attract enough attention, and that is how both Republicans are faring with African-Americans. A new survey of Virginia voters from the Judy Ford Wason Center for Public Policy finds that while Cuccinelli wins a plurality (44 percent) of the white vote, he has the support of only 4 percent of black voters. Meanwhile, recent polls have found that Christie attracts around 30 percent of black voters. Even if Christie doesn’t perform quite as well with African-Americans on Election Day, there is little doubt that he’ll break into double-digits.

Since the New Deal era, Democrats have tended to outperform among black voters, compared to Republicans. Yet the gap has become particularly pronounced over the past decade. In 2004, George W. Bush won 11 percent of black voters, roughly in line with how Republicans fared with African-Americans since the late 1970s. In 2012, however, Mitt Romney won a mere 6 percent of the black vote. Jamelle Bouie of the Daily Beast has thus argued that Republicans would be well-advised to focus on wooing black voters, as doing so would greatly damage Democratic prospects in swing states like Virginia, North Carolina, Ohio and Florida.

And while Republican political strategists have tended to focus on the growing Latino electorate, it is important to keep in mind that while African-Americans represent a smaller share of the U.S. population than Latinos (13.1 percent compared to 16.9 percent), they represent a slightly larger share of the electorate. This reflects the fact that African-Americans are more likely to be eligible to vote than their Latino counterparts, a disproportionately large share of whom are not citizens, and turnout rates among eligible African-American voters are higher than turnout rates among eligible Latino voters. So while blacks represented 12 percent of the population of eligible voters in 2012, they represented 13 percent of the voters who turned out that year. Latinos represented 11 percent of the eligible population and 10 percent of the voting population.

The harder question is how Republicans might appeal to black voters. The party has embraced a wide array of conservative African-American candidates in the hope that they would have crossover appeal. After Jim DeMint resigned from his U.S. Senate seat, he was replaced by South Carolina Rep. Tim Scott, an African-American aligned with the South Carolina GOP’s Tea Party wing. Former congressman Allen West and retired neurosurgeon Ben Carson have also garnered great enthusiasm in conservative circles, and the retired corporate executive Herman Cain was briefly one of the leading candidates for the Republican presidential nomination. So far, at least, black Tea Party candidates have failed to make deep inroads among black voters. For example, Cuccinelli’s running mate, E.W. Jackson, is an African- American Christian minister known for his apocalyptic tone, and the Wason Center finds that he has the support of only 1 percent of black voters in Virginia, a number well within the margin of error.

Christie’s re-election effort offers a different model for appealing to African-Americans. Rather than rely on surrogates, Christie has spent considerable time campaigning in New Jersey’s heavily-black urban cores. His praise of President Obama in the wake of Hurricane Sandy earned him the respect, if not the support, of many black Democrats last year, and he’s won at least some of them over to his side by championing school reform, criminal justice reform and other measures that will have a palpable impact on African-American communities. And though Christie has often emphasized the importance of spending discipline, he has been open to state and federal policies, like the new Medicaid expansion, that are seen as beneficial to low-income households.

It’s not at all clear that a Republican presidential candidate could win over African-American voters across the country quite as successfully as Christie has won them over in New Jersey. But Christie has demonstrated that shifting to the center can pay off.

PHOTO: New Jersey governor Chris Christie greets an attendee of a statewide prayer service at The New Hope Baptist Church on the one-year anniversary of Superstorm Sandy in Newark, New Jersey on October 29, 2013. REUTERS/Eric Thayer 
Comments
4 comments so far | RSS Comments RSS

I hope they disentegrate and separate into a wild menagerie of right wing factions, so the reasonable ones can once again have some sort of representation and the radical ones can toil in obscurity like they deserve to. then maybe America can get back to being great again.

Posted by jertho | Report as abusive
 

Christi is a good guy to have running the state of NJ and I like him a lot. As someone who has traveled about the US, I would be very surprised if he will ever be elected President. People in the north east US are not necessarily liked in other parts of the country. The other reason is that not enough voters see that the country is in a dire economic condition, losing respect about the globe and a victim of Obama’s abuse of the Executive Order all realized by how many people actually believe Obama’s lies and still support him. Frankly, I hope we are still a democracy by the time the next presidential election comes around. I would be very happy to see Christi as president and hope my personal analysis is incorrect.

Posted by Bighammerman | Report as abusive
 

I sincerely doubt Chris Christie could generate many votes from women. He is an overt bully and a hothead, and women don’t generally gravitate towards those exhibiting that type behavior, because we are more often on the receiving end of it. Christie is at least intelligent, but I wouldn’t trust him. Over 50% of voters are women and we show up at polls more predictably than any other subset of voters. Christie will never beat Hillary because the wingnut crowd won’t show up for him on a GOP ticket, but we will be there to vote for the first female president in 2016.

Posted by sylvan | Report as abusive
 

I am a woman and I would certainly vote for Christie. I don’t see him as a bully at all. He is willing to compromise and do the best for New Jersey and isn’t afraid to stand up to the Tea Party twits or the Looney Left either.

I wouldn’t vote for Hillary Clinton if you held a loaded gun to my head. I don’t know who I like the least, Bill or Hillary. I think voting for her because she is a woman is the dumbest thing I ever heard of. I don’t vote for a candidate because they are a man, a woman, white, black or whatever. I vote for the person that I think will do the best job for the country and I don’t believe that is Hillary Clinton.

Posted by Daleville | Report as abusive
 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
  •