Restoration Hardware fight looks familiar
Could the battle for Restoration Hardware become another situation like EGL, Inc? If so, Restoration CEO Gary Friedman may be upset at the prospect of a rival bidder, but it sure does help when that rival is willing to pay more.
Restoration agreed to be bought on Nov. 8 by a group including Friedman and private equity firm Catterton Partners. The management buyout was valued at $6.70 per share, or around $267 million.
Any buyouts that involve management often come under scrutiny, because after all, the deal involves an insider any way you slice it. Despite management’s supposed independence from the special committee deciding whether to do such a deal, the committee is intimately close with that manager(s). The likelihood of them getting the green light is pretty high.
On the flip side, an outsider arriving at a management buyout deal is probably not going to get as a warm a reception, for obvious reasons. In the Restoration Hardware deal, Sears is that other party. Not surprisingly, it looks as if the special committee has hardly rolled out the red carpet for them.
Sears, the retailer controlled by hedge fund guru Eddie Lampert, offered $6.75 per share for Restoration Hardware on Monday. Sears complains that Restoration is not offering any peaks into its books, despite a go shop period in place following the management-Catterton deal.
Will Restoration open its books to Sears? That remains to be seen.
If you’re wondering how this will all end up, take a look at what happened with trucking company EGL, Inc. And keep in mind that Sears’ buying power is a lot stronger right now than a private equity firm, which is limited in its borrowing levels thanks to the credit crunch.
In the case of EGL, Inc., a buyout group led by its CEO and Founder, James Crane, looked ready to seal a deal for the company earlier this year. Crane’s private equity partner was Centerbridge, which replaced General Atlantic after that firm got cold feet.
The deal looked good until Apollo Management not only offered a higher bid, but complained about being shut out of deal discussions. After some back and forth, Apollo handed over the highest price and won the deal. Money talks.
One thing to keep in mind in these situations is the “manager” or “managers” involved. Even though Friedman could end up losing the deal to another party, a bidding war raises the takeout price.
So if you’re him, which do you prefer? Being part of the company’s “go private” transaction, or seeing your stake in the company go up a few million bucks. Reuters data show that Friedman owns 2.6 million shares as of Nov. 8, or more than 6 percent of the company.
Sure, he’d probably like to stay with the company. But watching your shares go up in price isn’t a bad consolation prize.
In the case of EGL’s Crane, his original buyout offer was $36 per share. Apollo’s winning bid was $47.50 per share. It stinks to lose, but making millions in the process probably softens the blow.





