DealZone

Private Equity pulls in its horns

September 17, 2008

bull.jpg“Caution”, “nervous”, “uncertain”… not exactly the kind of words usually heard at a private equity conference. Attendees usually have far too much swagger for safety. But those, and worse, were the reiterated remarks at such a conference in New York on Tuesday, hosted by Dow Jones.

“It is going to be eerie for a while,” said Goldman Sachs global head of merchant banking, Richard Friedman. “Risk will become a four-letter word at this point. Everyone’s going to be more cautious.”

Friedman said it was too soon to predict the consequences of Lehman’s bankruptcy and Merrill Lynch’s hastily arranged takeover by Bank of America, but said having fewer providers of capital “I don’t think will be a good thing”.

For private equity, the hurdles to doing deals remain, with financing sources shrunk and daily blows of bad news from Wall Street. Both Friedman and Thomas H. Lee’s Scott Sperling, on the same panel, said prices being asked for businesses were still too high to be attractive. 

Pension fund managers are also nervous. “We’re stepping up conversati0ons with GPs (general partners) about everything we’re doing,” said CalPERS portfolio manager Michael Dutton. Dutton said in this environment, investors had to raise the bar and do more cautious diligence.

“My guess is it will become Darwinian,” said Goldman’s Friedman, when asked about fundraising. Investors will have to make tough choices about where to funnel their funds and which private equity firms to choose.

Still, those in the eye of the storm from the weekend’s developments soldiered on. William Hughes, the head of Lehman’s U.S. Loan Syndicate Group, showed up to speak on an LBO panel discussion, alongside Greg Margolies, Merrill Lynch’s head of leveraged finance and capital commitments. 

(Picture credit: Reuters)

Comments
One comment so far | RSS Comments RSS

Perhaps now PE firms will have to demonstrate an ability to achieve acceptable returns using something beyond leverage. Leverage has always increased risk in return for reward but now the trade-off is less attractive and less available. Is a new skill set needed?

Posted by R Johnston | Report as abusive
 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/