An act of God?

March 18, 2009


(UPDATE’S third paragraph to clarify the irony in Weinstein’s Ethics Czar reference).

Force Majeure is standard language in finance contracts, specifically debt paperwork. If you are building a pipeline across the San Andreas fault line and the earth moves, the risk that the hand of god has made it impossible for you to pay your debts is kind of a default valve absolving you from having to honor your contract. Is that what is happening with AIG? Those who argue contracts can (and, more alarmingly, should) be easily broken often cite Force Majeure as an example. But one might be hard pressed to find an example of a more man-made catastrophe than the seemingly crazy, but once pretty much standard contracts at AIG’s Financial Products divisions.

Later this morning, AIG’s CEO Edward Lilly is scheduled to strap into the Capitol Hill hotseat, where he is likely to face several fire hoses of vitriol over his decision to pay bonuses. He might also face a few thorny ones about settling bad bets with counterparty banks. Though the hand of God may not have been behind AIG’s demise, Liddy will certainly need divine intervention to ensure that he can conduct anything like business as usual at the not-quite-bankrupt but mostly government-owned insurer. Such an outcome would hardly be considered righteous by the angry mob.

BusinessWeek’s Ethics Guy Bruce Weinstein notes that the Obama administration has looked at appointing “Czars” for various troubled parts of America Inc., so why not an Ethics Czar? He says the real message behind his ironic lead is that we all need to be better at mastering  our own ethical universes and living up to higher standards. Indeed, while the outrage may be genuine, it’s easier to imagine ones neighbors accepting bonuses than ripping them up or handing them back to their employers. Another reader of this blog argued convincingly for the use of moral suasion to convince AIG’s big bonus heads to comply with common sense, and it also fits with President Obama’s state approach to accountability.

We notice that the official responses to the bonus issue include targeted taxes and other extraordinary measures to reclaim the bonus money. Somewhere, beneath all the hoopla, lies the ethical conundrum that it was legally prepared agreements that got the company into this mess, and it seems to be the trashing of these agreements that America is demanding to right its ethical ship.

Deals of the Day:

* International Business Machines is in talks to acquire Sun Microsystems , the Wall Street Journal said, citing people familiar with the matter. IBM is likely to pay at least $6.5 billion in cash to acquire Sun, the people told the paper.

* China has rejected Coca-Cola’s planned $2.4 billion acquisition of top juice maker Huiyuan Juice, saying the deal would have been bad for competition.

* The chairman of Indian financial services firm DSP Merrill Lynch said on Wednesday he had sold his 10 percent stake in the firm to Merrill Lynch & Co and would step down after March 31.

* Oil and gas company BowLeven said on Wednesday it had received a possible cash offer from an unnamed party at a price of 150 pence per share, which would value the business at about 130 million pounds ($182.4 million).

* Indian private sector lender ICICI Bank is considering spinning off its automated teller machines (ATM) and terminals, which accept credit and debit card payments, the Economic Times said on Wednesday.

* U.S. bank Goldman Sachs will launch a tender offer for Japan’s USJ Co Ltd this month, in an attempt to take the theme-park operator private, three people familiar with the matter said on Wednesday.

(PHOTO: Pope Benedict XVI leads a solemn mass to baptize thirteen babies at the Sistine Chapel at the Vatican January 13, 2008. REUTERS/Maurizio Brambatti/Pool)

2 comments so far | RSS Comments RSS

Thank you for mentioning my article, “We Need an Ethics Czar,” but the title is actually ironic. I’m *not* suggesting that President should appoint such a czar but am instead calling upon each of us to be our own ethics czars (that is, to set high standards for how we conduct our lives and to do the best we can to live up to those standards).


can the act of god be a defense in a drunk driving case where death was resulated? as was the case in my daughter who is in jail fighting a lifetime sentance for being drunk and driving and killing a person in the car with her.

Posted by quincy jones | Report as abusive

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see