<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No more rushing to the mailbox for those AmEx bills?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/2009/04/22/no-more-rushing-to-the-mailbox-for-those-amex-bills/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/2009/04/22/no-more-rushing-to-the-mailbox-for-those-amex-bills/</link>
	<description>Behind the deals and deal-makers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 03:40:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drewbie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/2009/04/22/no-more-rushing-to-the-mailbox-for-those-amex-bills/comment-page-1/#comment-341691</link>
		<dc:creator>Drewbie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/?p=14739#comment-341691</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t use AmEx, but I definately would NOT like it if my CC company quit sending a paper statement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t use AmEx, but I definately would NOT like it if my CC company quit sending a paper statement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helen S</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/2009/04/22/no-more-rushing-to-the-mailbox-for-those-amex-bills/comment-page-1/#comment-341690</link>
		<dc:creator>Helen S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/?p=14739#comment-341690</guid>
		<description>Paperless is fine, but if it then means an online account, it means yet another username and password (preferably distinct from other account details, for added security). Managers in senior roles already have numerous log ins, and yet another one is probably not welcome.

An opt in/out policy would be better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paperless is fine, but if it then means an online account, it means yet another username and password (preferably distinct from other account details, for added security). Managers in senior roles already have numerous log ins, and yet another one is probably not welcome.</p>
<p>An opt in/out policy would be better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
