<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Iron ore: Australians 1 Chinese 0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/2009/06/05/iron-ore-australians-1-chinese-0/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/2009/06/05/iron-ore-australians-1-chinese-0/</link>
	<description>Behind the deals and deal-makers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 04:03:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/2009/06/05/iron-ore-australians-1-chinese-0/comment-page-1/#comment-342397</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 22:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/?p=15594#comment-342397</guid>
		<description>Looks like the free trade talk between Australia and China is dead!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like the free trade talk between Australia and China is dead!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LL</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/2009/06/05/iron-ore-australians-1-chinese-0/comment-page-1/#comment-342365</link>
		<dc:creator>LL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 18:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/?p=15594#comment-342365</guid>
		<description>If double-dealing, and the hypocrisy of allowing the merger of BHP-RIO under the anti-trust laws is how you perceive winning, then yes - Australia 1, China 0.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If double-dealing, and the hypocrisy of allowing the merger of BHP-RIO under the anti-trust laws is how you perceive winning, then yes &#8211; Australia 1, China 0.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikkei 225</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/2009/06/05/iron-ore-australians-1-chinese-0/comment-page-1/#comment-342360</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikkei 225</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 13:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/?p=15594#comment-342360</guid>
		<description>Great deal this makes BHP and Rio the largest iron ore supplier in the world with a supply of around 270 million tonnes of iron ore a year. A smart move for Australia as well as they have a dominant player with the power to control future iron ore prices, Chinalco probably won&#039;t like this deal but selling a large stake of Rio would have been like selling the cow intstead of the milk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great deal this makes BHP and Rio the largest iron ore supplier in the world with a supply of around 270 million tonnes of iron ore a year. A smart move for Australia as well as they have a dominant player with the power to control future iron ore prices, Chinalco probably won&#8217;t like this deal but selling a large stake of Rio would have been like selling the cow intstead of the milk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
