Reuters Blogs

DealZone

Behind the deals and deal-makers

10:34 July 7th, 2009

Bidding war for Data Domain likely to surge on

Posted by: Jui Chakravorty
Tags: DealZone, , , ,

datastorageEMC on Monday increased its offer for Data Domain by 12 percent to $33.50 a share, valuing the specialty storage maker at $2.4 billion and raising stakes in a bidding war against rival NetApp.

EMC also removed a breakup fee from its offer for Data Domain and said it was ready to complete a deal within two weeks.

The battle for Data Domain, which began with an offer of $25 a share from NetApp,  has grown increasingly acrimonious. Last month, EMC took out a full-page ad in The San Jose Mercury News explaining to Data Domain’s employees why a deal with EMC is better than one with NetApp.

Data Domain, for its part, has maintained that a deal with NetApp makes more sense and raised questions about EMC’s motives. In an interview with The Mercury News, NetApp’s chief marketing officer called EMC’s bid a “defensive move to try to limit Data Domain’s growth.”

In an environment where getting any deal done is proving to be very difficult, this is a rare bidding war. And given the shaky markets, investors might prefer a cash bid.

Additionally, as the amount of data that companies store — and the cost to store it — is on the rise, demand for data-reduction technology, which boosts the efficiency of data storage equipment by deleting duplicate pieces of information, is likely to increase as well. This bidding war could drag on.

Post Your Comment

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word

House Rules:
  • We moderate all comments and will publish everything that advances the post directly or with relevant tangential information
  • We try not to publish comments that we think are offensive or appear to pass you off as another person, and we will be conservative if comments may be considered libelous information.