<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GE Finance and the road to recovery</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/2009/07/30/ge-finance-and-the-road-to-recovery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/2009/07/30/ge-finance-and-the-road-to-recovery/</link>
	<description>Behind the deals and deal-makers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 17:10:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: todnwth</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/2009/07/30/ge-finance-and-the-road-to-recovery/comment-page-1/#comment-350924</link>
		<dc:creator>todnwth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 02:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/?p=16536#comment-350924</guid>
		<description>I want to see some concrete evidence that GE deserves to be a buy instead of speculation. 
 
   I get tired of those who call themselves analysis, who are suppose to be PROFESSIONALS saying a stock is a buy and it goes the wrong way. 

  They are asleep at the wheel or more likely want to like by the corporation they are rating or I hate to say being paid off to rate them high---we do not anymore Enrons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to see some concrete evidence that GE deserves to be a buy instead of speculation. </p>
<p>   I get tired of those who call themselves analysis, who are suppose to be PROFESSIONALS saying a stock is a buy and it goes the wrong way. </p>
<p>  They are asleep at the wheel or more likely want to like by the corporation they are rating or I hate to say being paid off to rate them high&#8212;we do not anymore Enrons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: todnwth</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/2009/07/30/ge-finance-and-the-road-to-recovery/comment-page-1/#comment-350923</link>
		<dc:creator>todnwth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 02:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-dealzone/?p=16536#comment-350923</guid>
		<description>I want to see some concrete evidence that GE desires to be a buy. I get tired of analysis who it seems they are paid to rate a stock high and it goes the wrong way.

  Even morning star is suspect at times or they are sleeping or something. These claim to be PROFESSIONALS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to see some concrete evidence that GE desires to be a buy. I get tired of analysis who it seems they are paid to rate a stock high and it goes the wrong way.</p>
<p>  Even morning star is suspect at times or they are sleeping or something. These claim to be PROFESSIONALS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
