Reuters Blogs

DealZone

Behind the deals and deal-makers

15:05 September 21st, 2009

Is Dell overpaying for Perot?

Posted by: Chris Kaufman
Tags: DealZone, , , ,

With something like $10 billion in cash, Dell wouldn’t seem to be stretching itself to buy Perot Systems. But the $3.9 billion it is offering represents a 67 percent premium, so Dell shareholders should probably ask themselves whether Perot’s business is worth so much.

Perot is a business service company with a big component dedicated to health information. It was founded in 1988 by Ross Perot — the same Ross Perot who ran for U.S. president as an independent in 1992 and 1996.

Dell’s cash pile is burning a hole in its pocket. It has said it wants to step up acquisitions, and services businesses are a logical target area, with higher margins and steadier revenue than the business of building and selling computers that made Michael Dell (pictured in shades above) the tech mogul he is today.

But why does Perot command such a hefty premium? “We think this acquisition is expensive,” and even pricier than Hewlett-Packard’s purchase of EDS last year, said analyst Shannon Cross of Cross Research. She says the cost-saving benefits are few. Even Dell says cross-selling benefits won’t materialize until 2012.

“Dell investors should be outraged at paying such a large sum for such a small, vertical operation,” said Douglas A. McIntyre of Wall St 24/7.

One comment so far

Wow. That is a game changer of sorts….
After HP/Compaq/DE lining up service and hardware…. took Dell long enough to decide to go this route….
To bad they missed coming up with a competitive mp3 player/phone with a developer network… but hey competing the old fashion way on service and support has gotta work… doesn’t it?

- Posted by Anna Langella

Post Your Comment

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word

House Rules:
  • We moderate all comments and will publish everything that advances the post directly or with relevant tangential information
  • We try not to publish comments that we think are offensive or appear to pass you off as another person, and we will be conservative if comments may be considered libelous information.