Reuters Blogs

DealZone

Behind the deals and deal-makers

October 1st, 2009

Bank of America’s Chalice: Poison or Red Bull?

Posted by: Chris Kaufman

For months, as he endured hearings on Capitol Hill and fought off a series of lawsuits, Bank of America CEO Ken Lewis trudged through a post-apocalyptic financial landscape against a steady drumbeat of questions about his future. The deal he had called “the strategic opportunity of a lifetime” — his purchase/salvage of Merrill Lynch — had swung from an act of patriotism, keeping the American way of banking from utter ruin, to a scandal over Merrill losses and bonuses.

Perhaps he should have seen the writing on the walls of the vacant houses financed by Countrywide, the mortgage lender Lewis purchased/salvaged just six months before the Merrill deal. The two transactions may have been strategic gems, but they were laced with political poison as the economy floundered toward its dramatic deleveraging and taxpayers pumped $20 billion into Bank of America to fund the Merrill deal.

“It was only a matter of time,” Campbell Harvey, a professor at Duke University’s business school, told Jon Stempel. “There is too much collateral damage.” As Stempel reports, Lewis spent north of $130 billion on acquisitions, including FleetBoston Financial Corp, the credit card issuer MBNA Corp, LaSalle Bank Corp, Countrywide, Charles Schwab Corp’s U.S. Trust private banking unit, and Merrill. In buying Merrill, he added a giant investment bank to what was already the largest U.S. retail bank, credit card issuer and mortgage provider. (Wells Fargo & Co has since become No. 1 in mortgages.)

Lewis plans to be gone by the end of the year and leaves no immediate successor, so Bank of America has only a few months to figure out who to anoint. Though his demise is a cautionary tale, odds are good that the bank’s worst days are behind it. An incoming chief can blame Lewis for any ill-conceived agreements surrounding Merrill. More importantly, with economic recovery apparently at hand, Lewis’ deals of a lifetime have a better chance than ever of paying off.

September 10th, 2009

Who belongs in the Financial Crisis Undersung Hall of Fame?

Posted by: Adam Pasick

BROADWAYBreakingviews.com has compiled a list of unappreciated heroes of the financial crisis: “Some Good Names in a Year Gone Bad.”

Can you match up the undersung HOFers with their acts of contrarian bravery, as selected by breakingviews’ Antony Currie, Rob Cox and (formerly of Reuters) Jeffrey Goldfarb?

1. Tom Scholar

2. Jeff Kronthal

3. Harry Markopolos

4. Peter Wuffli

5. Greg Fleming

6. Jed Rakoff

A. Options trader who warned the SEC about Bernard Madoff’s Ponzi scheme

B. Merrill Lynch executive who warned his bosses about taking on too much risk

C. Former Merrill president who convinced CEO John Thain to accept an acquisition by Bank of America

D. Federal judge who challenged a settlement between the SEC and Bank of America

E. Former UBS boss who gave up a 12 million Swiss frank bonus after being ousted for, ahem, being too risk-averse

F. British civil servant who was a primary architect of the country’s life-support system for banks

I’m sure we are all comfortable within the confines of the honor system, so no Googling allowed. Read the answers — and nominate your own candidates — in the comments section.

July 20th, 2009

Lending CIT a hand

Posted by: Chris Kaufman

An almost heart-warming effort is being mustered by CIT bondholders to keep the troubled lender from getting put under the TARP or stumbling into a much-anticipated bankruptcy. Some $3 billion in survival cash is seen in the pipeline — money that could strengthen CIT’s finances and allow it more time for a debt restructuring. An announcement is expected before the markets open this morning.

What kind of terms might bondholders extract from CIT? Before TARP was modified to target executive pay for those who sought its shelter, banks such as Citigroup and then-independent investment house Merrill Lynch paid what were seen as shockingly high terms on mandatory convertible debt. They were the kind of rates Citi customers paid on credit cards; nothing like traditional bank funding rates.

So, a CIT deal could, and perhaps should, come with a variety of stringent terms. If these are effectively passed on to desperate small and medium-sized businesses that CIT serves, the cost of this rescue could be blamed for stifling the recovery.

June 11th, 2009

BoA hearing: class-action fodder?

Posted by: Paritosh Bansal

Ken LewisDennis Kucinich pointed out at a Congressional hearing Thursday that Merrill’s weekly losses in mid-November were greater than the losses in mid-December, and that Bank of America boss Ken Lewis got weekly updates on the investment bank’s losses. Lawmakers repeatedly said Lewis must have known much earlier than he claims about the heavy losses at Merrill, which lost $15.84 billion in the fourth quarter of last year.

That’s something that class action lawyers may latch on to, as they push their case over the Bank of America-Merrill Lynch deal, which hinges on what the bank disclosed and when.

Shareholders OK’d the deal on Dec. 5. Bank of America disclosed Merrill’s losses in January, after the deal closed. If shareholders knew of the losses before, the outcome could have been different.

Even just days before voting on the deal in December, shareholders appeared to doubt the likelihood of the merger going through on the original terms set in September. As of the close on Dec. 1, Merrill shares were still trading at an 8.3 percent discount to the Bank of America offer. 

At the Congressional hearing Thursday, Lewis said Ben Bernanke and Hank Paulson did not tell him what to tell shareholders. He said decisions on what to disclose to shareholders is made by “our securities lawyers and our outside counsel.”

But under questioning he also agreed with lawmakers that there was pressure from the government to complete the deal despite growing losses at Merrill. 

Clearly, Lewis was in a tough spot. But how would that play out in court?

May 15th, 2009

Temasek’s long China play gets short U.S.

Posted by: Chris Kaufman

TEMASEK/Singapore investment vehicle Temasek cut its losses in Bank of America and ran in the first quarter, dumping a 3 percent stake, for which it took a $3 billion hair cut. Having watched its relatively high-risk investment in Merrill Lynch turn to dust, the Singapore state agency turned to firmer ground: China.

Temasek was among the investors to gobble up a stake in China Construction Bank that Bank of America sold earlier this week as it further drew in its horns from the global recovery story. Sources say the move fits with Temasek’s focus on global companies that aim to grow in Asia, noting that Bank of America is losing whatever global allure it may have bought along with Merrill’s bad assets. Getting a “gentleman’s C” in the stress test doesn’t inspire much confidence either.

However bad things get for Bank of America, it’s hard to dispel the ghosts of China’s policy banking bedrock. Though they will tell you they have been shedding dud assets from their balance sheets for years, nobody is under any illusions about either transparency or solvency of the People’s banking system. That’s not to say such investments won’t pay off. After all, as the axiom goes, no risk, no gain.

Deals of the Day:

* British bank Barclays is in talks to sell its asset management business, Barclays Global Investors, a source familiar with the matter said.

* Miner Rio Tinto remains committed to a planned $19.5 billion tie-up with Chinese metals firm Chinalco, it said, responding to talk that the deal may be revised to let more shareholders take part in a rights issue.

* German cement maker HeidelbergCement may sell up to a 14 percent stake in Indonesian unit PT Indocement Tunggal Prakarsa, worth around $270 million, to help pay down debt, sources familiar with the deal said.

* Taiwan’s KGI Securities will pay T$29 billion ($880 million) for the brokerage arm of Taishin Financial, in the latest consolidation of the island’s fragmented and competitive financial sector.

(PHOTO: Temasek Holdings Chief Executive Ho Ching listens to a question during a news conference in Singapore February 6, 2009. REUTERS/Vivek Prakash)

February 3rd, 2009

OpenTable will try to revive VC-backed IPOs

Posted by: Phil Wahba

restaurant

Venture capitalists wanting to take portfolio companies public have fallen on hard times. So they will be watching closely when online restaurant reservation service OpenTable, which filed for a small $40 million IPO last week, attempts to price its deal.

Last year only six companies backed by venture capitalists went public, according to Thomson Reuters data, a far cry from the 86 in 2007. And none has performed well in the aftermarket.

But San Francisco-based OpenTable, whose IPO will be led by Merrill Lynch and whose backers include VC firms Benchmark Capital and Impact Venture Partners, is betting that its recently growing business will lure investors.

It also has an A-list of directors. Its CEO is former PayPal president Jeffrey Jordan, and one of its directors is Danny Meyer, the restaurateur behind New York eateries such as Union Square Café and burger joint Shake Shack.

According to its SEC filing, revenues totaled $41.3 million in the nine months ended Sept. 30, 2008, up 41 percent over the same period in 2007. It has now seated 90 million diners since it began in 1998 (then known as easyeats.com) in the 10,000 restaurants in foodie-populated cities like New York, San Francisco and Toronto that use its service.

So far, so good. But in its filing it bluntly cautions, “Our recent growth will likely not be sustainable.” Culprit number one: the recession.

People have a habit of eschewing $30 entrees when they don’t know if they’ll have a job next week, and higher-end restaurants in particular have been reeling.

OpenTable estimates that overall reservations at the restaurants it serves fell between 10 percent and 15 percent in the last three months of 2008 from the year-ago period. Even the National Restaurant Association sees sales across all types of restaurants only rising by 1 percent in 2009.

But VCs will be hoping this IPO, which could come as soon as three to four months from now, does better than the last VC-backed tech company to go public: Rackspace Hosting. Its shares are down 62 percent off their offer price since their August debut.

January 26th, 2009

Evercore gets league table boost; Lazard left in the cold

Posted by: Jessica Hall

Pfizer Inc’s $68 billion deal to buy Wyeth gave boutique investment banking firm Evercore Partners a huge jump in the rankings of merger advisers, while Lazard Ltd got left on the sidelines.

One mega-deal was enough to catapult Evercore, which advised Wyeth along with Morgan Stanley, into the list of Top 10 advisers. Evercore now stands at No. 7 for the global and U.S. rankings, up from No. 24 and No. 16 in 2008, according to data from Thomson Reuters.

Morgan Stanley stands at No. 2 globally with 15 deals, and No. 3 in the United States with 10 deals, according to Thomson Reuters.

Pfizer had an army of advisers that included Bank of America, Merrill Lynch, Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, Barclays and Citigroup. Bank of America Merrill Lynch leads the global league tables, while Barclays Capital leads in the United States, according to Thomson Reuters.

One name missing from today’s news was Lazard, which has been Pfizer’s most active adviser going back to the early 1990s, according Thomson Reuters.

Lazard has advised Pfizer on 15 deals, including its $89 billion purchase of Warner-Lambert Co  in 1999 and $61 billion acquisition of Pharmacia Corp in 2002, the data showed.

Lazard did not immediately return calls seeking comment.

January 22nd, 2009

Thain, Lewis part ways

Posted by: Paritosh Bansal

Thain and LewisJohn Thain’s out of the door as well. And one wonders if Ken Lewis could have saved himself a lot of heartache if only he had watched the action movie “Speed”.  

Sandra Bullock called it more than a decade ago. As her character says in the movie: You know, relationships that start under intense circumstances — they never last.

Thain’s departure leaves Lewis without several top executives at Merrill, which it acquired on Jan. 1 for $19.4 billion. Other top Merrill executives to recently leave include Robert McCann, who was to lead the combined brokerage, and investment banking chief Greg Fleming.

The acquisition has cost Bank of America dearly. It said Merrill lost $15.31 billion in the fourth quarter, separate from its own $1.79 billion quarterly loss — its first in 17 years.

Just a week ago, Lewis told investors he was happy that Thain was staying on. But the situation changed rapidly.

“Ken Lewis flew to New York today, met with John Thain, and it was mutually agreed that his situation was not working out, and he would resign,” Bank of America spokesman Robert Stickler said.

Thain’s departure came as CNBC separately reported the former Merrill chief had hired well-known Los Angeles interior designer Michael Smith to redecorate his office a year ago. CNBC said Thain ran up a bill of $1.22 million that included $35,115 for a “commode on legs” and $1,405 for a parchment waste can.

“John Thain saved Merrill Lynch. Crucify him if you must, but he sold Ken Lewis a bill of goods, and Ken Lewis bought it. He saved Merrill and took care of his boys on his way out,” said Smith Asset Management CEO William Smith.

(Photo: John Thain (L) looks up as Ken Lewis speaks during a news conference announcing the Bank of America Corporation acquisition of Merril Lynch in New York September 15, 2008. REUTERS/Shannon Stapleton)

January 22nd, 2009

$87,000 for an area rug?

Posted by: Stephanie Ditta

Would you spend $87,000 on an area rug? Absolutely, if you are John Thain, the former CEO of Merrill Lynch.

Thain refurbished his office at Merrill to tune of $1.22 million in company money, according to a Daily Beast/CNBC report.

Pictures of the rug are as yet unavailable, but in the words of the Big Lebowski, we bet it really tied the room together.

It was a rough day for Thain. Hours after the rug story came out, he was ousted from Bank of America, just three weeks after the Merrill merger closed.

Other extravagant purchases reportedly included:

  • A “mahogany pedestal table” ($25,000)
  • A “19th Century Credenza” ($68,000)
  • A “George IV Desk” ($18,000)
  • A chandelier in the private dining room ($13,000)
  • A “parchment waste can” ($1,400)
October 16th, 2008

Why bother

Posted by: Chris Kaufman

wall-st.jpgThe bloodletting of the third quarter is splattering over Wall St this morning, with grim market conditions taking their toll. Merrill Lynch reported a third-quarter net loss of $7.5 billion on write-downs and credit losses on complex debt securities. The once mighty brokerage last month accepted a takeover bid from Bank of America. It said that the net loss applicable to common shareholders widened to $5.58 per share from $2.3 billion and its loss from continuing operations was $5.56 per share, where analysts were expecting a $5.18 per share short-fall.

It also said revenues, excluding $8.3 billion in interest expenses, were $16 million dollars for the quarter. Seem paltry? Well, it was a big turnaround from the $2.1 billion net revenue loss recorded in the second quarter, but a far cry from the $380 million of net revenue taken in the same quarter a year ago. Contrast this with compensation and benefits expenses, which rose 76 percent to $3.5 billion “primarily due to the reversal of compensation expense accruals in the prior-year quarter”.  

Chief Executive John Thain engineered the speedy sale to Bank of America on the same weekend that Lehman Brothers was forced into bankruptcy, with just a few weeks left in the quarter, so there was plenty of writing on the wall. Did Merrill’s army of sales reps run out of steam trying to convince an investment-wary marketplace to take on risk? Given how grim things have been, they should probably be congratulated on managing positive net revenues at all.

Deals of the day:

* A bank founded by Russian gas giant Gazprom has bought one of Russia’s top 50 banks, the latest purchase of a privately owned bank by state-related structures as Russia fights the credit crisis. Gazenergoprombank, whose website says it was “founded by structures included in the Gazprom group”, said in a statement it bought 100 percent of Sobinbank. It did not disclose the price.

* Japanese trading house Marubeni said it has agreed to buy an additional stake in Australia coal miner Resource Pacific Holdings from Xstrata’s Australian coal unit for about 13 billion yen ($130 million).

* Mighty River Power has become a 19.95 percent cornerstone shareholder in wind turbine manufacturing company Windflow Technology with an investment of over $7.1 million.