<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Journalism in an age of innovation</title>
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-editors/2007/10/18/journalism-in-an-age-of-innovation/</link>
	<description>Our editors &#38; readers talk</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 21:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Richard Danbury</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-editors/2007/10/18/journalism-in-an-age-of-innovation/#comment-332148</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Danbury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 21:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-editors/2007/10/18/journalism-in-an-age-of-innovation/#comment-332148</guid>
		<description>It was a good speech. I hope it you thought it was "friendly" intense.

And you're right that technology isn't merely a way of making people redundant. Sure it can be, and can be a force for efficiency, clearing out those dusty old handlooms and replacing them with a magnificent steam powered machine. But the temptation is to think that efficiency is necessarily better, when it isn't.  You can get a McDonalds burger in 5 minutes, but you have to wait for a roast chicken.

Will the market guarantee quality? Not necessarily in our field.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was a good speech. I hope it you thought it was &#8220;friendly&#8221; intense.</p>
<p>And you&#8217;re right that technology isn&#8217;t merely a way of making people redundant. Sure it can be, and can be a force for efficiency, clearing out those dusty old handlooms and replacing them with a magnificent steam powered machine. But the temptation is to think that efficiency is necessarily better, when it isn&#8217;t.  You can get a McDonalds burger in 5 minutes, but you have to wait for a roast chicken.</p>
<p>Will the market guarantee quality? Not necessarily in our field.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Kelly</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-editors/2007/10/18/journalism-in-an-age-of-innovation/#comment-332146</link>
		<dc:creator>John Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 16:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-editors/2007/10/18/journalism-in-an-age-of-innovation/#comment-332146</guid>
		<description>David: I enjoyed your presentation Wednesday. Apparently, the Chinese DON'T say, "May you live in interesting times" (at least according to Wikipedia), but I think the sentiment applies now. It will be, uh, interesting to see how this all shakes out. Here's my recent take on one sliver of the issue: 
http://voxford.blogspot.com/2007/10/future-of-newspapers.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David: I enjoyed your presentation Wednesday. Apparently, the Chinese DON&#8217;T say, &#8220;May you live in interesting times&#8221; (at least according to Wikipedia), but I think the sentiment applies now. It will be, uh, interesting to see how this all shakes out. Here&#8217;s my recent take on one sliver of the issue:<br />
<a href="http://voxford.blogspot.com/2007/10/future-of-newspapers.html" rel="nofollow">http://voxford.blogspot.com/2007/10/futu re-of-newspapers.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
