<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Day One of the new Reuters News</title>
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-editors/2008/04/17/day-one-of-the-new-reuters-news/</link>
	<description>Our editors &#38; readers talk</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 04:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Zelda</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-editors/2008/04/17/day-one-of-the-new-reuters-news/#comment-333762</link>
		<dc:creator>Zelda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 16:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-editors/2008/04/17/day-one-of-the-new-reuters-news/#comment-333762</guid>
		<description>When I see a headline that I know is incorrect I toss a coin and bet its from Rueters or A.P.  Its satifiying that it is always the right choice.  Shame on your attempt to destroy what used to be an icon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I see a headline that I know is incorrect I toss a coin and bet its from Rueters or A.P.  Its satifiying that it is always the right choice.  Shame on your attempt to destroy what used to be an icon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-editors/2008/04/17/day-one-of-the-new-reuters-news/#comment-333757</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 02:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-editors/2008/04/17/day-one-of-the-new-reuters-news/#comment-333757</guid>
		<description>It is really a shame to see Reuters transforms itself, voluntarily, from a reputable news agency to an anti-china and pro-Tibet specialized propaganda machine, without showing any sound judgment and decency in its news report.  I noticed in many instances during the past month or so, Reuters deliberately mislabeled photos, stretched facts, used exaggerated numbered (e.g., Tibet death toll), cited biased sources without cooperating evidence (e.g., citing prominently statements made by Tibetan movement-in-exile about the ground condition in Lhasa while knowing perfectly well that Tibetan movement-in-exile has its own political agenda), or simply turning a blind eye to what really happened on the ground.  For example, in your reporting of Olympic torch relay in Argentina, you emphasized the presence of a small group of pro-Tibet protesters while failed to mention properly the presence of a much larger number of pro-China demonstrators.  

This is more like a political propaganda campaign, aimed at smearing rather than reporting, and driven by ignorance, arrogance and ideology than by a pursuit of truth.   

This is hard-core hypocrisy to its fullest.  
While Reuters uses the Human Rights banner to slander and demonize China, it is doing the very thing of abusing Chinese people’s human rights for dignity, respect, and equal treatment!  

If Reuters really tries to be the guardian of truth as it self-proclaims, it needs to take a hard look at its own practice.   A piece of advice, do your job as a true journalist will do and abide to the ethical code of your profession—being truthful, fair, and objective in your news reporting.   Otherwise, change your name!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is really a shame to see Reuters transforms itself, voluntarily, from a reputable news agency to an anti-china and pro-Tibet specialized propaganda machine, without showing any sound judgment and decency in its news report.  I noticed in many instances during the past month or so, Reuters deliberately mislabeled photos, stretched facts, used exaggerated numbered (e.g., Tibet death toll), cited biased sources without cooperating evidence (e.g., citing prominently statements made by Tibetan movement-in-exile about the ground condition in Lhasa while knowing perfectly well that Tibetan movement-in-exile has its own political agenda), or simply turning a blind eye to what really happened on the ground.  For example, in your reporting of Olympic torch relay in Argentina, you emphasized the presence of a small group of pro-Tibet protesters while failed to mention properly the presence of a much larger number of pro-China demonstrators.  </p>
<p>This is more like a political propaganda campaign, aimed at smearing rather than reporting, and driven by ignorance, arrogance and ideology than by a pursuit of truth.   </p>
<p>This is hard-core hypocrisy to its fullest.<br />
While Reuters uses the Human Rights banner to slander and demonize China, it is doing the very thing of abusing Chinese people’s human rights for dignity, respect, and equal treatment!  </p>
<p>If Reuters really tries to be the guardian of truth as it self-proclaims, it needs to take a hard look at its own practice.   A piece of advice, do your job as a true journalist will do and abide to the ethical code of your profession—being truthful, fair, and objective in your news reporting.   Otherwise, change your name!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shamsul Ismin Bin Tumin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-editors/2008/04/17/day-one-of-the-new-reuters-news/#comment-333750</link>
		<dc:creator>Shamsul Ismin Bin Tumin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 09:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-editors/2008/04/17/day-one-of-the-new-reuters-news/#comment-333750</guid>
		<description>Great and best wishes on new venture. All the best of luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great and best wishes on new venture. All the best of luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomson Reuters shares fall in first day of business &#124; The Wire &#124; Press Gazette</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-editors/2008/04/17/day-one-of-the-new-reuters-news/#comment-333748</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomson Reuters shares fall in first day of business &#124; The Wire &#124; Press Gazette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 08:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-editors/2008/04/17/day-one-of-the-new-reuters-news/#comment-333748</guid>
		<description>[...] a post on the Reuters Editors blog, editor-in-chief David Schlesinger said the company would combine the staff and services of the previous Reuters news and from Thomson Financial news [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] a post on the Reuters Editors blog, editor-in-chief David Schlesinger said the company would combine the staff and services of the previous Reuters news and from Thomson Financial news [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ali Mohammadi</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-editors/2008/04/17/day-one-of-the-new-reuters-news/#comment-333743</link>
		<dc:creator>Ali Mohammadi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-editors/2008/04/17/day-one-of-the-new-reuters-news/#comment-333743</guid>
		<description>Reuters is truly unique in a sense, where the audience appreciate the true value of its services including global coverage of news. I am keen to continue exploring the events of Reuters and Thomson. My best wishes goes to the people who work in this field so you and me get a sense of global events.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reuters is truly unique in a sense, where the audience appreciate the true value of its services including global coverage of news. I am keen to continue exploring the events of Reuters and Thomson. My best wishes goes to the people who work in this field so you and me get a sense of global events.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Frick</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-editors/2008/04/17/day-one-of-the-new-reuters-news/#comment-333742</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Frick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-editors/2008/04/17/day-one-of-the-new-reuters-news/#comment-333742</guid>
		<description>I would like to see more (or all) articles followed by opportunity for readers' comments. Otherwise keep up the great work. Reuters is my first read in the morning and final read at night.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to see more (or all) articles followed by opportunity for readers&#8217; comments. Otherwise keep up the great work. Reuters is my first read in the morning and final read at night.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.Ash</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-editors/2008/04/17/day-one-of-the-new-reuters-news/#comment-333741</link>
		<dc:creator>J.Ash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 18:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-editors/2008/04/17/day-one-of-the-new-reuters-news/#comment-333741</guid>
		<description>Absolutely phenomenal – the leading providers of critical information have collaborated. This is an endeavor that deserves much praise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely phenomenal – the leading providers of critical information have collaborated. This is an endeavor that deserves much praise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Fiori</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-editors/2008/04/17/day-one-of-the-new-reuters-news/#comment-333735</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Fiori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 14:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-editors/2008/04/17/day-one-of-the-new-reuters-news/#comment-333735</guid>
		<description>David, Good Luck and Godspeed. There is nobody better to be sitting at the helm of something like this than you. As great as the product is now, it is only going to get better and more in demand.

Charles</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, Good Luck and Godspeed. There is nobody better to be sitting at the helm of something like this than you. As great as the product is now, it is only going to get better and more in demand.</p>
<p>Charles</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaideep</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-editors/2008/04/17/day-one-of-the-new-reuters-news/#comment-333734</link>
		<dc:creator>jaideep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 13:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-editors/2008/04/17/day-one-of-the-new-reuters-news/#comment-333734</guid>
		<description>great and best wishes on new venture i hope more coverage will be given on curriencies market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great and best wishes on new venture i hope more coverage will be given on curriencies market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Jones</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-editors/2008/04/17/day-one-of-the-new-reuters-news/#comment-333730</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 11:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-editors/2008/04/17/day-one-of-the-new-reuters-news/#comment-333730</guid>
		<description>I have made Reuters my primary source for news information for a number of years now.  I have always valued what I perceived as an independent source with a high level of integrity.  I am looking forward to more of the same and more financial news from the Thomson side.

I want to congratulate you on your new venture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have made Reuters my primary source for news information for a number of years now.  I have always valued what I perceived as an independent source with a high level of integrity.  I am looking forward to more of the same and more financial news from the Thomson side.</p>
<p>I want to congratulate you on your new venture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
