<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Has Video Killed the Blogging Star?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-editors/2008/06/06/has-video-killed-the-blogging-star/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-editors/2008/06/06/has-video-killed-the-blogging-star/</link>
	<description>Our editors &#38; readers talk</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:23:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jacqueline church</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-editors/2008/06/06/has-video-killed-the-blogging-star/comment-page-1/#comment-334448</link>
		<dc:creator>jacqueline church</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 22:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-editors/2008/06/06/has-video-killed-the-blogging-star/#comment-334448</guid>
		<description>The universe it seems,does have a sense of irony. Again the spam script is so appropo...

anyway... Mark, I was just having a similar conversation with someone who was attending the same conference as I. She brought her laptop. I decided to rely on the business ctr which turned out to be two terminals - only one of which would work at a time ...

and don&#039;t get me started on bluetooth...does anyone actually think that&#039;s a marketing plus anymore? 

I just looked at videos on Brightcove last night..what a waste of that medium. Remember when mobile phones were new and someone would call you while they were mowing the lawn, just because they could? A guy was reviewing a cookbook in a video. No cooking, no shots of the pages, the recipes...like a presenter who reads his ppt bullets to you...

Oy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The universe it seems,does have a sense of irony. Again the spam script is so appropo&#8230;</p>
<p>anyway&#8230; Mark, I was just having a similar conversation with someone who was attending the same conference as I. She brought her laptop. I decided to rely on the business ctr which turned out to be two terminals &#8211; only one of which would work at a time &#8230;</p>
<p>and don&#8217;t get me started on bluetooth&#8230;does anyone actually think that&#8217;s a marketing plus anymore? </p>
<p>I just looked at videos on Brightcove last night..what a waste of that medium. Remember when mobile phones were new and someone would call you while they were mowing the lawn, just because they could? A guy was reviewing a cookbook in a video. No cooking, no shots of the pages, the recipes&#8230;like a presenter who reads his ppt bullets to you&#8230;</p>
<p>Oy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnBoy Walton</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-editors/2008/06/06/has-video-killed-the-blogging-star/comment-page-1/#comment-334404</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnBoy Walton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 04:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-editors/2008/06/06/has-video-killed-the-blogging-star/#comment-334404</guid>
		<description>No way dude, it&#039;ll never happen and you know it.
http://www.FireMe.to/udi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No way dude, it&#8217;ll never happen and you know it.<br />
<a href='http://www.FireMe.to/udi'>http://www.FireMe.to/udi</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Jones</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-editors/2008/06/06/has-video-killed-the-blogging-star/comment-page-1/#comment-334103</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 09:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-editors/2008/06/06/has-video-killed-the-blogging-star/#comment-334103</guid>
		<description>Jacqueline, I&#039;m with you on the limitations of the new technology. One small example: those of us at the conference who were &#039;live blogging&#039; had all sorts of problems with internet connectivity, which, in my experience, is always a problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jacqueline, I&#8217;m with you on the limitations of the new technology. One small example: those of us at the conference who were &#8216;live blogging&#8217; had all sorts of problems with internet connectivity, which, in my experience, is always a problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-editors/2008/06/06/has-video-killed-the-blogging-star/comment-page-1/#comment-334102</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 08:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-editors/2008/06/06/has-video-killed-the-blogging-star/#comment-334102</guid>
		<description>This is an interesting topic.  However, I don&#039;t think video blogging spells the eventual end of text blogging. After all, TV didn&#039;t spell doom for newspapers did it? As I read in the article or one of its comments, not all bloggers want to be on video and many prefer to remain somewhat anonymous.  Video blogging will just be one more option for people to communicate on the web.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an interesting topic.  However, I don&#8217;t think video blogging spells the eventual end of text blogging. After all, TV didn&#8217;t spell doom for newspapers did it? As I read in the article or one of its comments, not all bloggers want to be on video and many prefer to remain somewhat anonymous.  Video blogging will just be one more option for people to communicate on the web.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jacqueline church</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-editors/2008/06/06/has-video-killed-the-blogging-star/comment-page-1/#comment-334092</link>
		<dc:creator>jacqueline church</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 05:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-editors/2008/06/06/has-video-killed-the-blogging-star/#comment-334092</guid>
		<description>As I fill in the anti-spam script answer and ponder what my readers might think of my current outfit and hair...I realize I have tons of notes to integrate into some coherent content, gathered from recent conferences and travel. 

These notes are dispersed over a paper notebook (and my handwriting is now, officially, atrocious), some notes I entered into my Tungsten (which technically could be Wi-Fi compatible but the company is going under and no longer makes the card.) I think there might be a reminder recorded on a little digital recorder thingee my husband bought me in a sweet attempt to help bridge the platform gaps. 

I carried the Tungsten and folding keyboard to travel light and left the laptop at home, comforted by the promise of a business center.

I also have some notes in in emails I sent to myself from various &quot;24/7&quot; hotel business centers, where connectivity was patchy and many guests awaited use of the one or two terminals...rather than hog the one terminal that was working, slowly, I thought I&#039;d send a note and that would remind me later, at home, of what I wanted to write.

well, you get the picture. Or, not. 

As the current example may help illuminate, I hold the following truths to be self-evident:
1. wi-fi, web 2.0, bluetooth and other promises are still largely unfulfilled (my phone, PDA and computer are all sold as &quot;capable&quot; or &quot;enabled&quot; but...
2. potential does not equal reality
3. writing in pjs is still the M.O. most often deployed by me and many other freelancers I know;
4. this is not a visual that would entertain or titillate any of you - I guarantee it. 

Of course, in print I could tell you I&#039;m a 19 y.o. blonde in something very slinky. Do you really want the truth? I&#039;m in mismatched sweats with an orange tabby on my lap. I&#039;m far north of 19 though  I wash up pretty well on a good day. That day is not today.

No dear reader, I spare you the truth. You can&#039;t handle the truth. For now I give you the gift of text (only).

Cheers,
Jacqueline Church</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I fill in the anti-spam script answer and ponder what my readers might think of my current outfit and hair&#8230;I realize I have tons of notes to integrate into some coherent content, gathered from recent conferences and travel. </p>
<p>These notes are dispersed over a paper notebook (and my handwriting is now, officially, atrocious), some notes I entered into my Tungsten (which technically could be Wi-Fi compatible but the company is going under and no longer makes the card.) I think there might be a reminder recorded on a little digital recorder thingee my husband bought me in a sweet attempt to help bridge the platform gaps. </p>
<p>I carried the Tungsten and folding keyboard to travel light and left the laptop at home, comforted by the promise of a business center.</p>
<p>I also have some notes in in emails I sent to myself from various &#8220;24/7&#8243; hotel business centers, where connectivity was patchy and many guests awaited use of the one or two terminals&#8230;rather than hog the one terminal that was working, slowly, I thought I&#8217;d send a note and that would remind me later, at home, of what I wanted to write.</p>
<p>well, you get the picture. Or, not. </p>
<p>As the current example may help illuminate, I hold the following truths to be self-evident:<br />
1. wi-fi, web 2.0, bluetooth and other promises are still largely unfulfilled (my phone, PDA and computer are all sold as &#8220;capable&#8221; or &#8220;enabled&#8221; but&#8230;<br />
2. potential does not equal reality<br />
3. writing in pjs is still the M.O. most often deployed by me and many other freelancers I know;<br />
4. this is not a visual that would entertain or titillate any of you &#8211; I guarantee it. </p>
<p>Of course, in print I could tell you I&#8217;m a 19 y.o. blonde in something very slinky. Do you really want the truth? I&#8217;m in mismatched sweats with an orange tabby on my lap. I&#8217;m far north of 19 though  I wash up pretty well on a good day. That day is not today.</p>
<p>No dear reader, I spare you the truth. You can&#8217;t handle the truth. For now I give you the gift of text (only).</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Jacqueline Church</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
