<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Law firms as media companies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-editors/2008/10/30/law-firms-as-media-companies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-editors/2008/10/30/law-firms-as-media-companies/</link>
	<description>Our editors &#38; readers talk</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 07:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: marc romano</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-editors/2008/10/30/law-firms-as-media-companies/#comment-335661</link>
		<dc:creator>marc romano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 02:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-editors/?p=10524#comment-335661</guid>
		<description>A corrected version.

A nice piece. Thank you. I agree with your points.

I read so much about the legal industry’s emerging use social media albeit among a small percentage of firms. I also read quite a lot about innovation and its application among a minority of firms. Innovation, however, is interpreted by many as offering more than an hourly rate billing option and a strong focus on client service. Hardly innovative.

In my opinion, before any firm can engage and communicate effectively with social or new media, suggest or act as if they are innovative and stop calling clients clients and refer to them as customers, they need to understand and purse the act of branding. They have to effectively and strategically position themselves internally and externally. Their brand positioning and value proposition must be measured against the realities of the market and their ability to deliver real value against the deeper needs of clients.The entire firm needs to be singing the exact same song. Everything they do must be measured against whether or not it is creating value for the brand. Once that’s in place, let them Twitter and blog. The use of social and new media will be complimenting and strengthening the brand and communication will be guided by brand principles and sound strategy.

Ignyte is a brand strategy firm for the legal industry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A corrected version.</p>
<p>A nice piece. Thank you. I agree with your points.</p>
<p>I read so much about the legal industry’s emerging use social media albeit among a small percentage of firms. I also read quite a lot about innovation and its application among a minority of firms. Innovation, however, is interpreted by many as offering more than an hourly rate billing option and a strong focus on client service. Hardly innovative.</p>
<p>In my opinion, before any firm can engage and communicate effectively with social or new media, suggest or act as if they are innovative and stop calling clients clients and refer to them as customers, they need to understand and purse the act of branding. They have to effectively and strategically position themselves internally and externally. Their brand positioning and value proposition must be measured against the realities of the market and their ability to deliver real value against the deeper needs of clients.The entire firm needs to be singing the exact same song. Everything they do must be measured against whether or not it is creating value for the brand. Once that’s in place, let them Twitter and blog. The use of social and new media will be complimenting and strengthening the brand and communication will be guided by brand principles and sound strategy.</p>
<p>Ignyte is a brand strategy firm for the legal industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: "set in style" &#8212; Blog Archive &#187; The Law Firm as Publisher</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-editors/2008/10/30/law-firms-as-media-companies/#comment-335388</link>
		<dc:creator>"set in style" &#8212; Blog Archive &#187; The Law Firm as Publisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-editors/?p=10524#comment-335388</guid>
		<description>[...] Seems as if Mark Jones, Global Community Editor for Reuters, agrees. See his article &#8220;Law firms as media companies.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Seems as if Mark Jones, Global Community Editor for Reuters, agrees. See his article &#8220;Law firms as media companies.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buffalojump</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-editors/2008/10/30/law-firms-as-media-companies/#comment-335380</link>
		<dc:creator>buffalojump</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 01:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-editors/?p=10524#comment-335380</guid>
		<description>How low can you go ? Law doesn't mean justice or truth, media does not reflect justice and truth. So why not law firms in the media. 1 uncredible + 1 uncredible = ? surely not a credible media run by law firms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How low can you go ? Law doesn&#8217;t mean justice or truth, media does not reflect justice and truth. So why not law firms in the media. 1 uncredible + 1 uncredible = ? surely not a credible media run by law firms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pranab Hazra</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-editors/2008/10/30/law-firms-as-media-companies/#comment-335368</link>
		<dc:creator>Pranab Hazra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 15:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-editors/?p=10524#comment-335368</guid>
		<description>With the advent of highly sophisticated communication technology,publishing tasks have been turned to be unique and easier as well.Today publishing works have been accorded with different arrangements available through diverse performances of multi-media.Nowadays, most of the contents are filtered from different types of readymade presentable or produced materials available easily.Moreover, the emphasis on portable contents, by publishing through websites have brought a new challenge to the media concern indeed.Media concern has been turned to be very good business field for wider recognition.So,carrying just ideology today,media concerns are not resrained.The objectivity of media contents has been stick to picking up the price for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the advent of highly sophisticated communication technology,publishing tasks have been turned to be unique and easier as well.Today publishing works have been accorded with different arrangements available through diverse performances of multi-media.Nowadays, most of the contents are filtered from different types of readymade presentable or produced materials available easily.Moreover, the emphasis on portable contents, by publishing through websites have brought a new challenge to the media concern indeed.Media concern has been turned to be very good business field for wider recognition.So,carrying just ideology today,media concerns are not resrained.The objectivity of media contents has been stick to picking up the price for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
