Reuters Editors

Our editors & readers talk

Does foreign news exist anymore?

By Sean Maguire
November 21, 2008

One of the side remarks at a debate on journalism I attended was that large British news organisations no longer cover ‘foreign news’. They cover ‘world news’. The argument at a London awards ceremony was that in a globalised world, where a multiplicity of perspectives are available on the Internet, news editors should no longer get correspondents (us) to write about foreigners (them). The belief is that the Us/Them dichotomy reinforces harmful stereotypes and encourages shallow reporting rather than deep and detailed journalism.

Much of the debate was about whether contemporary Anglo-Saxon journalism is doing enough to get beyond stereotyping. Amid that was the nagging fear that audiences do not want to part with their prejudices and that news editors will not give correspondents the opportunity to persuade them. The panel of correspondents lamented the diminishing volume of international reporting in the pages of the mainstream press and on the news programmes of major broadcasters. We know the reasons – competition for viewers and readers, pressure on budgets, an assumption that news from distant places is hard to make relevant to fickle audiences. There was a touch of vocational insecurity to the discussion. Nobody likes to think their profession is changing and is being pushed from the limelight. The panelists were reminded there never really was a golden age for foreign news (if I may be excused the term) and correspondents abroad had always struggled to grab the front page. There was some irony as well to hearing BBC friends worry about the corporation’s appetite for international journalism when, as panel moderator Allan Little pointed out, its roster of foreign correspondents has gone from 10 to over 200 in the last two decades. 

The thornier question was does mainstream English-language journalism deliver an accurate portrayal of the world? Who better to probe the issue than the winners of the annual Kurt Schork award, which celebrates compelling and insightful journalism? Anas Aremeyaw Anas, who won for his bold exposes of human trafficking in his native Ghana, doubted if journalists parachuted from abroad could understand his country effectively. You don’t have the language skills and you don’t have the time it needs, he remarked. Nicholas Schmidle, a young American, won in the freelance category for his stories from Pakistan and Afghanistan on the complexities of the Islamist insurgency. He too spent months on his articles and noted they could not have been done without a network of trusted local guides to help him navigate the issues. 

The BBC’s Bridget Kendall spoke of the tyrannous power of televison images that solidify a cliched view of the world. Print and radio’s spoken word allow more freedom to challenge the settled view. The United States, in particular, was accused of living in a bubble of isolation that its television news programmes rarely challenge with fresh global perspectives. Schmidle said it was not as if Americans did not want to know. “The demand is there, but the demand is not meeting the funds.” 

How else to better reflect the realities of the world? The internet is making space for different views but is mainstream journalism opening the door to seeing things differently? Panel participant Peter Apps, a Reuters correspondent left in a wheelchair by a horrific traffic accident while on assignment in Sri Lanka, called for a more racially diverse workforce in journalism. He recalled being sharply but correctly upbraided by non-white colleagues in South Africa if his articles contained a hint of colonial colouring. Audience members reminded the panel that the BBC World Service does a fine job reporting  Africa from African perspectives. One view from the debate floor was that minority groups within newsrooms have a responsibility to challenge stereotypes.

Schork, who died while on assignment for Reuters in Sierra Leone in 2000, spent his short journalistic career staring at the grimmer realities of the world and trying to strip the layers of obfuscation and deceit from around them. He was always ready to challenge the complacencies and self-deceptions within journalism as much as in the world he reported upon. Good journalism requires that neither challenge stop.


A larger portion of the present media organizations except fewer one among them,are failing to preserve or maintain the ethics of the journalism. They are oftenly seen to practice their activities of journalism, by keeping away the laid down ethical codes widely from their execution.The media concerns are avidly engaged in making news for their news hunger readers that part of events which have already been focused or highlighted considerably.The media concerns are less interested in making news for any new events or issues rather than priorified or emphasized area of hotness. It can be said in other words,that the media are oftenly inclined towards ‘Reselling of potential old news in new pattern’.It is surprising that,why they are doing so without making new one? Any risk they find? Probably they are lacking their confidence on establishing the new one contents to be interesting and viable as compared to ‘sure shot’ old one commercially.
So, most of the media concerns are acting as news producing agent like,and behaving as the part of journalism with mission and ethics. Media today, are the promoter of the mostly emphasized events as demanded by a certain portion of our society by keeing away the interests of larger portion of our society as well.

Though there are so many journalists,who want to present so many facts or events with truthfulness and greater accuracy before our society. Those journalists are ready to face any kinds of challenges in extracting the core parts of the issue or event as to make the contents to be more complete and perfect that may appear as’News’to the world. These journalists are not allowed either to speak the truth or write the correct one. So, naturally the objectivity of journalism fails in our society.

The western journalism, particularly American and British journalism which deserve a significant height power in this regard, are not unveiling the true picture of rest underdeveloped world. A highly innovative and creative journalism that oftenly could be expected from their part, are not bringing any good to the related society at all. As the mission and objective of journalism should remain all the same everywhere in the world.The English language journalism needs to be running harmonically with the facts or events move ahead.


The question is does the United States have unbiased news? Sure seems that othe countries see things different then the left Wing Libbie’s who report ours.

Posted by ddorth | Report as abusive

Foreign news media are produce best news for people. These news are very important and useful. The perspectives of thse news are available on internet.


why people ruin the most beautiful things on
earth that these building that took years to
build . the crazy needs to live in filthy
for the rest of their life some people love
see nice things the ones that destroy needs
their checking account debit to pay for this mess.

Posted by isiah obriant | Report as abusive

I think the like of BBC do a far better job than the CNNs of the world when it comes to reporting on foreign news. Still, there is no substitute for locally produced content. It it usually difficult for foreign journalists to accurately capture cultural nuances and sensitivities to particular local issues.


Sean. Sean. “Much of the debate was about whether contemporary Anglo-Saxon journalism is doing enough….” And that is why Reuters is currently in bad, bad trouble. Its standards are rock bottom.


Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see