Reuters Editors
Our editors & readers talk
from From Reuters.com:
Welcome to our new home
Reuters is a news power house - our 2,800 journalists in 190 different bureaus around the world are dedicated to being the indispensable news source. News has been in our blood for more than a century and a half, but we've always been restlessly innovating and always looking to the future.
For Reuters.com, the future is now.
This is our redesign, a year in the making. That's a year of extensive discussions with people like you, our elite audience of business professionals, about what would make the site better and faster and easier to use for you as you drive business activity around the world.
We want this to be the world’s best website covering business and finance news, analysis, and opinion. Full stop.
We want you to be able to come for a quick glance at the top headlines, or a longer deep dive into a topic that's important to you. We want you to scan the output of the 2,800 men and women or hone in on a favorite writer or photographer.
This site is for you; we want it to be your ticket to a wealth of news, information, and analysis presented in a cutting-edge format, including text, video, pictures, graphics, user interaction, and personalization features (try the new toolbar at the bottom of every page).
Request #2844 Reuters Online Editorial Policy for Revisions to Already Published Articles
Rbarber17
Feb-28 14:02
Please respond to my comments made about the following Reuters article on 28-Feb-2011 at 11:00 am EST:
http://www.reuters.com/article/comments/ idUSTRE71Q1W920110227
How is it possible for the time stamps of bloggers to be earlier than the time and date of the article, unless of course the author goes in and “tweaks” it, not realizing that by doing so, he is changing the time stamp, too.
Regards,
barberrr
=============================
CommentsVictor Jeffrey Serote
Thomson ReutersDear Rbarber17,
Thank you for contacting Reuters.com support. Please be informed that your feedback has been escalated to the Editorial team for review.
Kind regards,
The Reuters.com Team
=============================
Mar-01 2011 10:45 Rbarber17
Quite a lengthy wait for your Editorial team’s response. When can I expect to hear back from them? Is it possible Reuters has no existing policies for the issues raised in my Blog comments?
=============================
Mar-04 2011 11:50 Rbarber17
What is the normal time to respond to a request?
=============================
Mar-07 2011 12:47 Victor Jeffrey Serote
Thomson ReutersDear Rbarber17,
Apologies for the delay in responding to you. The Editorial team is currently reviewing the case. If indeed a bug, this will undergo a replication cycle so it will show correctly in the site.
Again, we are sorry for the inconvenience that this caused you.
Regards,
The Reuters.com Team
=============================
Mar-07 2011 13:26 Rbarber17
28-Feb-2011 Request submitted
01-Mar-2011 Request “escalated to the Editorial team for review”
02-Mar-2011 No response received
03-Mar-2011 No response received
04-Mar-2011 No response received
05-Mar-2011 No response received
06-Mar-2011 No response received
07-Mar-2011 Editorial team “currently reviewing the case”
08-Mar-2011 No response received
09-Mar-2011 No response received
10-Mar-2011 No response received
11-Mar-2011 No response received
How long does it take to answer a simple question? Has Reuters got somehting to hide?