Comments on: Is a 10 percent chance of disaster too high for a nuclear power station? http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-investigates/2011/03/29/is-a-10-percent-chance-of-disaster-too-high-for-a-nuclear-power-station/ Insight and investigations from our expert reporters Thu, 02 Jan 2014 05:21:21 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.5 By: aligatorhardt http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-investigates/2011/03/29/is-a-10-percent-chance-of-disaster-too-high-for-a-nuclear-power-station/comment-page-1/#comment-287 Wed, 04 May 2011 10:56:23 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/the-deep-end/?p=988#comment-287 Why should people be expected to accept the risk of deadly disaster? There is no need for the risk. No other method of electric generation can produce such great and widespread harm. Nuclear power should be outlawed.

]]>
By: hotturtle http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-investigates/2011/03/29/is-a-10-percent-chance-of-disaster-too-high-for-a-nuclear-power-station/comment-page-1/#comment-272 Fri, 01 Apr 2011 07:36:59 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/the-deep-end/?p=988#comment-272 Japan has major earthquakes every year. I think they mean a 10% chance of breach for every nuclear plant (w/i 50 years). That’s a lot more than a 10% chance overall.

]]>
By: salviati http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-investigates/2011/03/29/is-a-10-percent-chance-of-disaster-too-high-for-a-nuclear-power-station/comment-page-1/#comment-268 Wed, 30 Mar 2011 06:52:44 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/the-deep-end/?p=988#comment-268 What fools. Only to be surpassed by the fools in the US who will refuse to discontinue our own Nuke plants despite of the disaster unfolding in Japan.

]]>
By: richardmyers33 http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-investigates/2011/03/29/is-a-10-percent-chance-of-disaster-too-high-for-a-nuclear-power-station/comment-page-1/#comment-267 Wed, 30 Mar 2011 02:07:25 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/the-deep-end/?p=988#comment-267 Totally selfish and unacceptable, look at the consequences. All reasonable people that care for their fellow beings, as well as for the integrity of the earth’s environment have to oppose these forces that gamble with our very existence.

]]>