<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is a 10 percent chance of disaster too high for a nuclear power station?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-investigates/2011/03/29/is-a-10-percent-chance-of-disaster-too-high-for-a-nuclear-power-station/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-investigates/2011/03/29/is-a-10-percent-chance-of-disaster-too-high-for-a-nuclear-power-station/</link>
	<description>Insight and investigations from our expert reporters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 03:06:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: aligatorhardt</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-investigates/2011/03/29/is-a-10-percent-chance-of-disaster-too-high-for-a-nuclear-power-station/comment-page-1/#comment-287</link>
		<dc:creator>aligatorhardt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 10:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/the-deep-end/?p=988#comment-287</guid>
		<description>Why should people be expected to accept the risk of deadly disaster? There is no need for the risk. No other method of electric generation can produce such great and widespread harm. Nuclear power should be outlawed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why should people be expected to accept the risk of deadly disaster? There is no need for the risk. No other method of electric generation can produce such great and widespread harm. Nuclear power should be outlawed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hotturtle</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-investigates/2011/03/29/is-a-10-percent-chance-of-disaster-too-high-for-a-nuclear-power-station/comment-page-1/#comment-272</link>
		<dc:creator>hotturtle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 07:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/the-deep-end/?p=988#comment-272</guid>
		<description>Japan has major earthquakes every year.  I think they mean a 10% chance of breach for every nuclear plant (w/i 50 years).  That&#039;s a lot more than a 10% chance overall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Japan has major earthquakes every year.  I think they mean a 10% chance of breach for every nuclear plant (w/i 50 years).  That&#8217;s a lot more than a 10% chance overall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: salviati</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-investigates/2011/03/29/is-a-10-percent-chance-of-disaster-too-high-for-a-nuclear-power-station/comment-page-1/#comment-268</link>
		<dc:creator>salviati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 06:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/the-deep-end/?p=988#comment-268</guid>
		<description>What fools.  Only to be surpassed by the fools in the US who will refuse to discontinue our own Nuke plants despite of the disaster unfolding in Japan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What fools.  Only to be surpassed by the fools in the US who will refuse to discontinue our own Nuke plants despite of the disaster unfolding in Japan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richardmyers33</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-investigates/2011/03/29/is-a-10-percent-chance-of-disaster-too-high-for-a-nuclear-power-station/comment-page-1/#comment-267</link>
		<dc:creator>richardmyers33</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 02:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/the-deep-end/?p=988#comment-267</guid>
		<description>Totally selfish and unacceptable, look at the consequences. All reasonable people that care for their fellow beings, as well as for the integrity of the earth&#039;s environment have to oppose these forces that gamble with our very existence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally selfish and unacceptable, look at the consequences. All reasonable people that care for their fellow beings, as well as for the integrity of the earth&#8217;s environment have to oppose these forces that gamble with our very existence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
