1099 tax rule may bring big pain to small business
The new rules on 1099 forms, which were attached to the health care bill and are set to go into effect in 2012, call for all businesses, no matter how small, to file 1099 forms for goods as well as for services. That sounds like a technicality, but it’s got small business up in arms.
Here’s why it matters, and what you need to know.
What exactly is the rule, anyway?
The new rule requires all business to file 1099 forms for goods as well as services, if those goods cost over $600 annually (the current threshold). It also gets rid of the distinction between corporations, which previously did not need to receive 1099s, and unincorporated entities, which did. The rule is slated to go into effect in 2012.
Who will it affect?
It will affect all businesses, including sole proprietors, consultants, self-employed people and freelancers, who are considered businesses for tax purposes, but may not think of themselves that way. It also will apply to charities and other tax-exempt organizations. The National Taxpayer Advocate, based on Internal Revenue Service data, figures that it will affect 26 million sole proprietorships, 4 million S corporations, 2 million C corporations, 3 million partnerships, 2 million farms, 1 million charities and other tax-exempt organizations, and likely more than 100,000 federal, state and local government entities. All told, that’s more than 38 million taxpayers and taxpaying entities.
What does it mean?
It means that you’d better be ready to track your spending by vendor, and have an easy way of tallying up whether that spending totals more than $600 per year. A business that spends $20 a week on pizza for its employees, for example, would spend a total of $1,040 a yea r— and would need to file a 1099 form to that local pizzeria.
The recordkeeping complexities are mindboggling, and there are still a lot of unanswered questions about how this new rule might be implemented. Internal Revenue Service Commissioner Douglas Shulman has said that the agency will look to exempt transactions done with credit or debit cards. While a credit-card exemption would provide significant relief to many small businesses, it could create its own recordkeeping issues (businesses would then need to distinguish between payments made by card and those done by cash or check to the same vendor) and it could also wind up unintentionally hurting businesses that do not accept credit cards.
The National Taxpayer Advocate Nina Olson notes in her latest report to Congress that the new rules “could have distortionary effects on taxpayer behavior,” because large vendors can more easily track purchases on their computerized accounting systems, while small businesses cannot. “It’s a headache, there are increased costs, and I think there is also significant concern about how they will implement it,” says Dena Battle, director of tax policy at the National Association of Manufacturers, one of the business groups that has pushed for repeal. “Any time you have these ‘tax gap’ provisions, there are gigantic unintended consequences.”
How did it come to pass?
Federal lawmakers have been looking for ways to close the “tax gap,” the more than $300 billion chasm between what Americans owe in taxes and what they actually pay. This provision was included in the health care legislation, one of more than a dozen revenue-raising measures in that bill. The Joint Committee on Taxation has estimated that it will bring in $17 billion in tax revenues over 10 years.
Will it actually go into effect, or might we see some relief?
The National Federation of Independent Business and a slew of other small-business groups have called for the provision’s repeal. But recent proposals in Congress to get the 1099 reporting requirements repealed or changed have thus far failed to pass. Republican Senator Mike Johanns of Nebraska sponsored legislation that would have eliminated the 1099 requirement, while Democratic Senator Bill Nelson of Florida proposed legislation that would have exempted businesses with fewer than 25 workers and raised the reporting threshold to purchases over $5,000.
With all tax legislation now stalled until after the mid-term elections, and bigger tax questions to be dealt with before yearend, it’s unclear what might happen to this rule between now and when it’s slated to go into effect.
What are some of the potential complications?
As with most things tax, the complications are in the details, and the recordkeeping complexities. For example, how will you track that $600, if you spend it at multiple locations of the same business? What if some payments are made by check and others by credit card to the same vendor? What about returns? Will a business be required to send 1099 forms to its electricity provider or to its landlord? Get into the thorny details, and the questions — largely unanswered — seem endless. For sole proprietors, who use Social Security numbers for tax purposes, the new rule also raises the potential for identity theft, especially if that number becomes public through printing on receipts, according to the National Taxpayer Advocate. As Steve Henley, a national practice leader at financial consultancy CBIZ MHM, says: “It is a tremendous new administrative burden, and it is so senseless.”
Are there penalties for messing up?
Yes. A business can be fined $50 for every 1099 it fails to report, and that amount can rise to $100 if the failure to file was considered “intentional.” Also, businesses would be required to withhold taxes at a rate of 28% from vendors who fail to supply their taxpayer identification numbers.
What can I do to prepare?
If you’re running a start-up or one-person operation that doesn’t already have a separate business credit card, get one. To comply with the rule, you’ll need to be sure that you have the legal name, address and taxpayer identification of each of your vendors on file. If you don’t, you’ll want to take some time in 2011 to send Form W-9s out to all of them in order to gather this information. Keeping tabs of all this information will be much easier if you’ve got computerized accounting software that can track payments by vendor and tally them up — distinguishing between credit-card payments and cash or checks — so that come yearend you’ll know who needs to get a 1099. If you don’t have such software, you’ll need to come up with an alternate method to track this information.
Photo: April 15, 2009 at the IRS tax office in New York City. REUTERS/Lucas Jackson
Comments RSS










Who wrote this and included it in this piece of legislation? That’s what I need to know. Especially now…voting time.
This really, really affects my community of women-owned small businesses and many of the independent (sole proprietor) bloggers who subsist on goods received for services and advertising.
We’re all concerned. Right now, I’m able to do my own accounting and taxes each year, saving my business a HUGE fee. I do pay to use an accounting and invoicing system (will that require a 1099?!?!?) and use tax software but it’s all been manageable; now, though, I’m worried.
I’m a small business — just me. I incorporated to work smarter, and do as much of my own administration as possible to save money. My family depends on my income so I work hard to succeed.
So far I have managed to thrive in a bad economy and achieve (as best as one can) that place of work-life balance by being self-employed and thus more flexible to juggle work and family. It’s more than business; it’s a lifestyle.
Nickel and dime fees put that at risk.
Gee I thought they were for small business. If they want to “close the tax gap” how about they enforce what is already on the books. If I was a business owner I would just stop spending with each company at the $500 threshold. Of course that isn’t going to be good for business since I’ll spend less. I guess I’m not thinking like a politician.
As a bookkeeper for a small construction firm, I am already seeing what a horrible mess this is going to become just from purchasing fuel for equipment. We will have to track gas purchases by individual gas stations (how many hundreds of those are there in each city?) because most of them are independent franchises, not corporate owned.
What I foresee happening is the cancellation of employees company credit cards, and a return to the days when we used to reimburse employees for gas purchases. Then we’ll only need to issue a 1099 to the employee for the reimbursement. Unfortunately that puts a burden on the employees having to float the company, keeping track of their receipts, and deal with additional tax forms on their personal returns.
I fully understand the need to tighten the reporting process, but there needs to be a little common sense mixed in.
I work for a national payroll provider and this has our clients in a panic. We have thousands of clients in each of over 50 cities in the US, and they would each have to send our corporate office a 1099 for the service of handling their payroll. I don’t imagine our corporate office is thrilled with the idea of hundreds of thousands of 1099 forms flooding in either.
Relax friends. This insanity will never get anywhere. No one except the most ardent Obamaton is going to comply with this garbage. It will die via abortion or those who wrote this piece of crap.
Hrm. Just think how many 1099s Staples or Office Depot will end up with as a result of this.
The U.S. Constitution states as follows:
Article 1. Section. 7. Clause 1: All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives.
It is known to all that Obama’s healthcare legislation which includes this revenue raising legislation started in the Senate.
Therefore, the entire legislation is unconstitutional.
Joel Robinson
Congress enacted this provision because it knows that tax fraud is rampant in small business. These tax cheats are leaching off law-abiding taxpayers.
When I first read this I was horrified at the paperwork and accounting overhead which would result from this change.
However, in giving this more consideration – it is a great idea!
There are many, many, many small businesses which operate as cash tills for their owners. Some owners purchase personal goods and services as a business expense. Many of those in the construction industry “expense” the goods necessary to build themselves mansions. Certain businesses woefully underreport their revenue (e.g., pizza parlors).
This will level the field. Do I like this legislation? No, we as a nation are becoming fascist. Is is proper and fare? Yes! Individuals have to file detailed returns, so should businesses.
Just getting you all ready for VAT
What a boondogle! Glad I closed my business.
No doubt many business owners do run personal purchases thru their businesses. This would not stop them from doing so. But remember, that is NOT the purpose of this little item inserted in the legislation. The purpose is to raise money to pay for the awful health bill.
Because it was a small item inserted into an unrelated piece of legislation, it’s poorly defined and vague, creating uncertainty (as is that entire document). To use the word of the moment, it lacks “transparency”. Not to mention that most congressmen have stated they didn’t even know it was in there!
Congress should establish rules prohibiting the inclusion of such unrelated crap in legislation, forcing any such laws to stand on their own, to be properly debated, defined and fleshed out. This is a perfect illustration of regulatory overload.
As if starting your own business AND being successful isn’t hard enough. Somethings wrong with this picture.
This garbage should of never been mixed in with the health care bill. Witch in itself is pure garbage. I agree that laws should stand on their own and properly
debated.