Is it time to dump your financial adviser?

January 18, 2011

Helen Ramos of Fairfield, California, listens to an advisor during a counselling event for homeowners applying for mortgage modifications in Oakland, California, August 13, 2010.  REUTERS/Robert GalbraithHere’s the ugly truth about your financial adviser:  the unreturned phone calls, vague investment advice or too-good-to-be-true promises could mean it’s time to break up and move on.

It sounds trite, but it’s true. What you have with your adviser is a relationship — and if it’s dysfunctional, it will cost you money.

Consumers are confused about the financial advisers they trust, and on how they are regulated, according to a report released Tuesday by the General Accounting Office. That’s with good reason; the study found that while financial advisers are regulated, the actual enforcement of that regulation varies from one adviser to another, depending upon how they are classified. Consumers are often confused by the sheer number of titles and designations and what they actually mean, said the GAO.

“You need to feel like you can count on this person to be honest, trustworthy and caring… money is a very intimate issue,” says Susan Hirshman,  author of “Does This Make My Assets Look Fat?” and president of SHE Ltd, a consulting firm focusing on financial literacy for women.

As in all relationships, it all boils down to communication, Hirshman says. Be honest about the kind of relationship you signed up for.  If you’re the type of investor who needs a half an hour of soothing if the markets tank, don’t tell your adviser you’re cool under pressure. Likewise, don’t be annoyed by your adviser’s monthly calls if you requested them in first place.

“It’s your adviser’s job to assess what your needs are, so be up front about what you need and expect right from the start,” Hirshman says.

A blip of bad performance isn’t grounds to send your adviser packing either if you’re happy with the rest of your relationship,  she says.

Here are some surefire signs it’s time to walk away:

He doesn’t ask any questions (or he asks way too many). An adviser who doesn’t ask questions can’t possibly gather the amount of information required to to help you out. On the other hand, too many questions — especially those unrelated to your financial goals — may feel intrusive and unhelpful. Again, it all depends on the type of relationship you set out to have in the first place. If your styles don’t mesh and you feel uncomfortable talking about important financial matters, it’s time to move on.

The market is in meltdown and your adviser is MIA. Generally speaking, your adviser should get back to you within 24 hours if you have an urgent concern and within a couple days for less pressing matters. While you shouldn’t expect your adviser to be at your beck and call, be wary if the phone only rings when she has something to sell. (As a matter of fact, it’s probably better if the only thing he’s ‘selling’ is his services, and not products laden with high hidden fees or commissions.)

It’s too good to be true. Did you hear about the stock that’s guaranteed to quadruple in price and make you rich? That’s because it doesn’t exist.  Be suspicious of get rich quick schemes, Hirshman warns. If it sounds too good to be true, it is.

There’s no plan: If your adviser can’t explain how he intends to make sure you can retire at 65, there’s a problem. “Your adviser should be able to say, ‘This is the process, this is how I’ll execute it, and this is how I will measure its success’,” Hirshman says. If your adviser can’t deliver the details, be worried.

It’s not him, it’s you: Sometimes your financial needs grow too complex for your adviser. If you find yourself in a situation that requires sophisticated tax and estate planning, you may need to find another expert. Is your adviser connected to the right accountants and valuation experts in your area? If the answer is no, find someone who is.


Comments

This is so true. All those advisors need to let go and the money saved to be put in investors’ accounts. They’re absolutely no good.

Posted by jsg | Report as abusive
 

The SEC has established “fiduciary”-standard as the saving grace for the brokerage industry. Sadly (infuriatingly so-) enough they continue to put their head in the sand and continue to push products which earn THEM more than their clients. Walk away from that kind of person and go with the cheapest ETF-fund (at the moment Vanguard, Blackrock 2nd)
Here’s what the SEC has to say:
http://www.sec.gov/news/speech/2010/spch 032610laa.htm
As fiduciaries, investment advisers owe their clients an “affirmative duty of ‘utmost good faith, and full and fair disclosure of all material facts,’ as well as an affirmative obligation to ‘employ reasonable care to avoid misleading’” [their] clients.3 Accordingly, investment advisers are required to serve the interests of their clients with undivided loyalty. An adviser that has a material conflict of interest must either refrain from acting upon that conflict, or it must fully disclose all material facts relating to that conflict, and obtain the informed consent of its clients, before acting.4 In addition, an investment adviser has the duty to seek best execution,5 to make suitable recommendations,6 and to have a reasonable basis for the investment advice that is provided to clients.7

Posted by Duhhh101 | Report as abusive
 

This is extremely well written and to the point. It addresses having realistic ecpectations from your financial advisor along with warning signs you may be working with the wrong person.

Posted by brycesanders | Report as abusive
 

This article doesn’t mention that advisers who are paid by commission are motivated to trade a lot. So there’s a built-in bias in their actions.
They also may get paid by the company they work for, to dump bad stocks on you or to sell you the company’s mutual funds.

Posted by fallingup | Report as abusive
 

There are advisors who only sell service, no commissions, no products, they ONLY generate their income based on a clients’ asset values.

They are called fee-only advisors, look it up.

Your assets grow, their income grows. Its the way it should be. Client and advisors interests are aligned.

And the fiduciary standard as mentioned above is acknowledged by the SEC and regulated by the SEC. A Registered Investment Advisor is held to the fiduciary standard. They are registered with the SEC and you can literally find them on the SEC website.

Brokers (‘talk to Chuck’, ‘go it alone’, etc etc) have no fidiciary standard and neither do insurance agents or probaly most ‘advisors’ you talk to at a bank. They are all held to a ‘suitability’ standard as they sell products that must be ‘suitable’ – quite a vague term.

Find out how an advisor is paid and you will see where there motives lie. Also, advisor is not a profession, its a job description and anyone can call themselves advisors with little or no justificiation.

Posted by BHOlied | Report as abusive
 

@jsg,
I have no idea what you are talking to but I’d love to disagree – I just can’t even understand what you’re saying…

Posted by BHOlied | Report as abusive
 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/