4 ways to add inflation protection to your retirement plan

March 23, 2011

 man speaks on his mobile phone in the Canary Wharf financial district in London February 16, 2011.  REUTERS/Luke MacGregorThe consumer inflation rate hit an 18-month high in February, driven mainly by higher food and energy prices. But few economists think the longer-range inflation rate is heating up — there’s still too much slack in the labor and housing markets.

Over the long haul, inflation is a potential threat to retirement security, since a well-constructed plan looks out over a 25- to 30-year horizon. Yet inflation protection isn’t baked into nearly enough retirement plans, according to a new survey by the Society of Actuaries.

The study found that 72 percent of pre-retirees — and 55 percent of retirees — have a strategy to protect themselves against inflation in retirement. But the percentages probably are too optimistic, according to Steve Vernon, a prominent retirement educator and co-author of the report. “That’s higher than my experience talking with people at the seminars I teach. I think, there’s a say/do gap there, where people say they’re planning for inflation, but they’re not.”

“Other studies show that only half of pre-retirees have even calculated the amount of money they’ll need for retirement,” he adds. “So if that’s true, there’s no way 72 percent have thought about inflation.”

Vernon’s on the money there; the new 2011 Retirement Confidence Survey from the Employee Benefit Research Institute shows that just 42 percent have tried to calculate how much they’ll need to live comfortably in retirement.

Inflation poses several retirement challenges. Healthcare is a major area of expense and risk in retirement, and those costs are rising about four times faster than overall inflation. Meanwhile, sources of guaranteed income are faltering. Social Security is replacing a smaller percentage of income due to the increasing full retirement age implemented in 1983, rising Medicare Part B premium deductions and more Social Security income subject to income tax. The near-disappearance of traditional defined benefit (DB) pensions in the private sector also hurts retiree purchasing power.

Here are four ways to add inflation protection to your retirement plan:

Social Security provides important inflation protection. It’s one of the few retirement benefits around with a built-in cost-of-living adjustment (COLA), which is made using a formula set by federal law. Working at least until your Normal Retirement Age (currently 66) boosts your odds of receiving higher lifetime payments, and you’ll receive all the COLA adjustments from the intervening years.

The current yardstick used to measure consumer prices — the CPI-W — didn’t yield a COLA in 2009 or 2010 due to low inflation. However, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) forecasts that a 1.1 percent COLA will be made in 2012, a 1.2 percent raise in 2013 and average increases of 2.1 percent from 2014 through 2021.

That’s the good news. Here’s the bad: deficit reform proposals call for changing Social Security’s cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) formula by adopting a new “chained CPI” that takes into account “substitution purchases” consumers make to avoid high prices. If adopted, the “chained” CPI is expected to rise 0.3 percent less annually than the CPI-W.

Model your retirement portfolio to allow for an annual withdrawal rate of four percent, plus an additional bump for inflation starting in year two of retirement. Adjust that plan only if necessary to preserve assets in the event of a severe bear market.

My Reuters colleague John Wasik offers excellent recommendations on how to protect your portfolio from the potential ravages of inflation, including the use of Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities and higher-yielding global bonds.

An income annuity can protect against inflation if you purchase one with a cost-of-living feature that provides automatic increases in payments indexed to inflation. I like income annuities — otherwise known as Single Premium Income Annuities — as a way to assure that you can meet all your living expenses in retirement. Here’s a good way to think about it: Start with your total monthly expenses, and subtract your expected Social Security and any other guaranteed income source, such as a defined benefit pension. The gap amount is what you could fill with an inflation-indexed income annuity.

Long-term care insurance should be purchased with a feature that adjusts daily benefit payments annually to protect against escalating nursing care costs. An annual five percent compound growth option is typical, and can boost the benefit value of a long-term care policy significantly over time. The American Association for Long-Term Care Insurance calculates that a policy bought in 1995 by a 55-year-old couple with a $150 daily benefit amount and a five percent compound growth option would grow to a $508 daily benefit by 2020, when they’re both 80 years old.

Comments

Retirees will simply have to survive as best they can on whatever they have. Without a stable and predictable currency or social benefit, we all are simply at the mercy of the Government. If anyone does manage to protect themselves against inflation, those assets can be confiscated at the stroke of a pen.

The fact is that in current times, old age is less predictable today than it has been in centuries.

Posted by txgadfly | Report as abusive
 

I wonder if we’ll start to see much more of an aging workforce, where skilled but pushed out elderly are forced to look for work in areas that don’t require much skill, or alternatively, they start banding together to form competitive businesses that don’t prejudice the elderly.

Posted by gurari | Report as abusive
 

One can’t help but wonder how safe 401k’s and IRA’s are with the current deficit. It’s all too easy to do a “one time” tax on these assets to help balance the budget. No one is safe when our governments spending is completely out of control.

Posted by actnow | Report as abusive
 

Don’t worry folks, it’ll all collapse soon. New systems will emerge that will work for the 21st century society.

Posted by tmc | Report as abusive
 

from the article: “But few economists think the longer-range inflation rate is heating up — there’s still too much slack in the labor and housing markets.”

Most economists are prognosticating from a seriously misguided and antiquated frame of reference.

America may still be the largest economy on earth but it is no longer the financial monolith at center of the universe and the laws of financial physics as we once knew them have changed.

The troubled labor and housing markets will not prevent a sustained increase in inflation. Those factors will not have that much effect on the long-term inflation computations.

Home values continue to fall but mortgage payments do not fall in parallel. In fact if interest rates move up (and there isn’t any other direction to go), those who still have adjustable rate mortgages will find their payments increasing.

Not many people are lowering their housing costs by moving into mortgages for new purchases right now. In fact, a significant number of Americans are entering the rental market, driving rental rates up sharply in many areas.

Hoping that the anemic labor market will somehow hold down inflation is nothing short of ridiculous. It will only hold down wages. The value of things is no longer solely a function of America’s appetite for them. Commodity prices are up sharply and will continue to rise due to investors, speculators, and world-wide demand.

Additionally, the cost of energy intrinsic in making and moving products will exert upward pressure on prices as energy prices rise (we will not be getting any future big breaks in the cost of energy, either).

The inflation that DC has been praying for has finally raised its ugly head even though QE2 won’t be done injecting capital into the system until June 2011.

This is going to get ugly.

Posted by breezinthru | Report as abusive
 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/