Fidelity: Cost of retiree healthcare is falling
Fidelity Investments says the cost of healthcare in retirement is falling for the first time since the company began tracking health spending ten years ago — and the new healthcare reform law is getting the credit.
Fidelity estimates that a 65-year-old couple retiring this year will need $230,000 to pay for medical expenses throughout retirement, not including nursing-home care. That represents an eight percent decline from last year, when the estimate was $250,000 and the spending forecast jumped 4.2 percent.
The drop in this year’s forecast stems from changes to the Medicare prescription drug program contained in the Affordable Care Act (ACA) that reduce out-of-pocket spending by seniors. The law gradually closes the notorious “doughnut hole,” which is the gap in coverage that starts when a drug plan beneficiary’s annual drug costs hit $2,830 and continues up to $4,550, when “catastrophic” coverage kicks in.
This year, the ACA mandates that pharmaceutical companies provide a 50 percent discount on brand-name drugs to seniors who enter the doughnut hole. Starting in 2012, the gap itself will be closed gradually until it is eliminated completely in 2020.
Ninety percent of Medicare enrollees have Part D coverage, and Fidelity estimates that about 30 percent of them will enter the doughnut hole in any given year.
The Fidelity study assumes no employer-provided retiree health coverage, and a life expectancy from age 65 of 17 years for men and 20 for women. It includes spending for traditional Medicare premiums (Part B and Part D), out-of-pocket drug costs and a variety of other co-payments and deductibles.
Fidelity cautions that this year’s decline likely is a one-time event; the company still expects health expenses to keep rising over time due to higher costs for services, introduction of new technology and higher utilization of services such as diagnostic testing.
Sunit Patel, a senior vice president in Fidelity’s benefits consulting practice, also notes that there’s considerable uncertainty about how the ACA will impact Medicare over time, including possible changes to provider payments, reform of fraud and abuse, and Medicare Advantage reimbursement levels. “We’ll need time to see how it plays out,” he says. “Right now, there’s nothing definitive we can point to that quantifies the long-term impact.”
What you can do:
Save. Be sure to include health expenditures in your projected retirement spending needs. Although most of us expect Medicare to cover everything, there does appear to be growing recognition that health is a major expense in retirement.
For example, Fidelity reports growing interest among employers in Health Savings Accounts (HSAs), which permit investment of pre-tax dollars, tax-free growth and withdrawals for workers who want to save to offset health expenses. HSAs do have significant limitations; their use is limited to workers enrolled in high-deductible insurance plans ($1,200 for an individual, $2,400 for families). Contributions are limited to $3,050 for individuals, and $6,150 for families.
Work longer. Staying on the job even a few years longer than planned is one of the best overall ways to counter health expenses, because it means more years of employer-sponsored health insurance and delayed Medicare enrollment.
Get an annual drug benefit check-up. Seniors should re-shop prescription drug plans annually to ensure that they are getting the best price and appropriate coverage. Insurance companies often change their offerings year-to-year in ways that can increase premiums by thousands of dollars, or make it difficult to get certain drugs. And, your health needs may change, too.
Comments RSS










Wow, it is good to have some good news once in a while concerning the Affordable Care Act. The truth is that there is a ton of savings that is to be realized from Medicare, via health reform. Fee-for-service billing is very expensive, compared to the Accountable Care Organization (ACO) structure that is demanded under reform. Also, there is a ton of fraud, waste and abuse under Medicare that can be eliminated via some of the new health reform agencies and funding. And, the Independent Payment Advisory Board, under reform, has a great deal of promise, as well.
We have nowhere to go but down in the per-capita spending on Medicare. If we don’t get that going, health care costs will sink the nation. And, if savings through greater prevention, efficiencies and accountability come in Medicare, these can be transferred to private insurance costs, as well.
This is why so many of us wrote our representative in support of the changes under the Health Care Act. We didn’t get everything we pushed for, with the biggest gap being a single payer system, but more and more people are starting to see benefits under the passed law and that will slowly change the attitude of the people so dead set against it due mostly to missinformation from groups with definite political and personal wealth agendas.
Round two is to push the single payer system to really drive down costs and improve health services for the majority of Americans and cover all of our citizens for less than we pay in total today. That’ll have to wait, though, until Obama’s second term. His re-election is looking much better between positive news on the HCA, the economy rebounding, and employment slowly recovering over the next year. The GOP knows this, too, which explains the weak slate of candidates so far. I think the GOP power brokers are going to hold back their best candidates for 2016, and let 2012 fall where it may.