Comments on: Should the U.S. Treasury sell annuities? http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-wealth/2011/05/25/should-the-u-s-treasury-sell-annuities/ Fri, 05 Dec 2014 11:27:18 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.5 By: Davebue http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-wealth/2011/05/25/should-the-u-s-treasury-sell-annuities/comment-page-1/#comment-5271 Fri, 27 May 2011 20:38:44 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-wealth/?p=14364#comment-5271 I am disappointed that the only 3 comments so far, have uniquely panned this clever, simple idea. The majority of respondents have voted in favor of offering an annuity option sponsored by the US Treasury. This annuity concept would be beneficial and give people security. Yes it is like social security only different. I am a long term financial planner and have been concerned that the IRA/401k/403b/annuity industry is established for the financial industry benefit instead of for the benefit of the tens of millions of potential retirees. Less than 25% of Americans are saving any where near enough to retire. Also, Social Security is being reduced in importance as the years go on. My grandmother lived almost exclusively from her social security check. Now that is more difficult. All of the financial industry products are fine for those who can afford them. But the majority of Americans need to be able to have something simpler and safer.
If the US Treasury allowed people to convert some of their savings to an annuity, the Treasury could benefit by having more debt financed by Americans, reminiscent of the War Bonds of the two World Wars.
These annuities would have to be offered by an independent commission who should structure the payout as a function of long term US Treasury current interest rates, current mortality tables and some kind of modest profit which would cover all costs, sales and otherwise, and then some. Other annuities might pay a better rate, but a US Treasury annuity would at least offer a stable reliable alternative. Chile and the United Kingdom currently require that their citizens purchase an annuity with at least a portion of their retirement savings. I believe that the USA would be best off if Americans understood better the risk of running out of money. We have definitely not thought through the options for the 3 to 4 million people annually who will be facing retirement. This annuity could be handled as a “Social Security buy extra”. Say the US Treasury’s independent commission forecast a Treasury bond rate to be 1.0% greater than inflation. A person who purchased an extra $100,000 of social security income at age 66 would be entitled to an extra $500 (woman)to $640 (man)per month in social security income. This could then be inflation adjusted over time.

]]>
By: gkjohn http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-wealth/2011/05/25/should-the-u-s-treasury-sell-annuities/comment-page-1/#comment-5264 Fri, 27 May 2011 13:42:36 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-wealth/?p=14364#comment-5264 This vote did not suprise me . Most people who want the government to Be ALL things!!!!,there provider,there purpose, there sustainer,there regulater,there protector,there sourse oy thinking AND there god.

]]>
By: Mangojulie http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-wealth/2011/05/25/should-the-u-s-treasury-sell-annuities/comment-page-1/#comment-5252 Thu, 26 May 2011 15:37:16 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-wealth/?p=14364#comment-5252 Most people don’t have a clue what an annuity is. Those that have a clue have huge misconceptions about what annuities do because of the confusing mess that is foisted on them by the insurance companies who sell annuities.

People don’t buy annuities because they think they can mange their own retirement income just fine thank you and are oblivious to longevity risk (the risk they will outlive their assets). Furthermore, when informed that one of the trade-offs is a lack of full liquidity, most refuse to go along even though the benefit of that illiquidity is a lifetime income that is substantially higher than anything they could accomplish using other financial vehicles.

Finally, an annuity is useless to the majority of Americans who have insufficient money set aside for any retirement. Maybe your survey question was supposed to be, “should the government give away annuities to those who have not taken the personal responsibility to adequately save for retirement?” And the answer is a resounding, “NO!”

In any event, it appears that the question is totally MOOT because the government already operates the biggest annuity program in the world, which is effectively backed up by the US Treasury. It is called Social Security!

]]>
By: annuitywizard http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-wealth/2011/05/25/should-the-u-s-treasury-sell-annuities/comment-page-1/#comment-5251 Thu, 26 May 2011 15:07:15 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/reuters-wealth/?p=14364#comment-5251 Wow… I thought the results of the survey would be the opposite. 70% of people think a federally issued annuity is a good idea, really?

Yeah sure, let’s put them in charge of even more of our financial well being. Congress has certainly done an excellent job managing the country’s finances. We might as well surrender our hard earned retirement savings too.

Sorry guys, you’ll have to count me out on this. I prefer to run my own life… and I’ll take the responsibility and risk that goes with it.

]]>