NEW YORK, July 20 (Reuters) - Why did shares of CIT rally as much as 100 percent today? Presumably investors saw headlines with the word “rescue” and thought it made sense to take a flyer. This is foolish.
CIT is highly leveraged and its assets are deeply troubled. Even if CIT is “saved” through a restructuring, there’s no prospect that the equity will have any value. The only hope is a backdoor bailout, and that’s highly unlikely.
To understand why CIT’s stock is essentially worthless, all you need to know is one equation: Assets = Liabilities + Equity. For a financial company like CIT, assets are the loans it makes to borrowers. Its liabilities are the dollars it borrows from lenders and depositors to fund those loans. Shareholder equity is what’s left over.
As the economy has deteriorated, so has the value of CIT’s assets. But the value of its liabilities remains fixed. Equity acts like a buffer to protect the value of liabilities as asset values fall. In other words, stock investors eat losses so that lenders and depositors don’t have to.
Lenders see the value of CIT’s assets has declined and, consequently, aren’t interested in lending anymore. This leaves CIT facing the same type of liquidity emergency that led to the failures of Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers. And any lender-sponsored “rescue” would divvy up what remains of CIT’s assets amongst themselves, leaving equity holders with nothing.
Under its “base case” stress test scenario, ratings firm CreditSights estimates that CIT may face as much as a $4.6 billion capital shortfall. A more severe economic environment could leave CIT facing a $7.6 billion shortfall. Unsecured senior and subordinated debt holders face “a significant haircut” and preferred shareholders are likely to see “diminutive returns.” There isn’t enough pie for creditors to split, so shareholders shouldn’t expect anything left over for them.
So why take a a gamble on the stock? Maybe investors think Ben Bernanke will successfully reflate the economy, or perhaps CIT will find a buyer. As long as the company can kick the can down the road, there’s always hope, right? Actually no. With unemployment headed towards 10 percent, the underlying default rate on CIT’s assets will get worse before it gets better.
The other possibility is a bailout. True, FDIC has denied CIT’s request to access its debt guarantee program and yes, Treasury is unwilling to extend additional credit after losing the $2.3 billion of TARP money it already invested in CIT.
But an implicit bailout may still be available: FDIC-insured deposits. CIT Group has an FDIC-member subsidiary, CIT Bank. If CIT can’t convince the Feds to back its debt directly, maybe it can persuade them to allow an asset transfer from the holding company to the bank subsidiary in order to access more FDIC-insured deposits. Compare the 13 percent interest rate CIT is likely to pay bondholders to “rescue” its business with the two percent interest rate it would likely pay on one-year CDs guaranteed by FDIC and you understand why deposits are a preferable funding mechanism.
But it will take much regulatory forbearance to make that happen. Both the Federal Reserve and FDIC would have to sign off. We already know that Sheila Bair isn’t a fan of CIT’s business model. She didn’t grant them access to the ebt guarantee program because she clearly does not want to expose her agency to more losses. Thankfully for taxpayers, who ultimately stand behind insured deposits, it’s a safe bet she won’t let CIT raise any more.
With no bailout on the horizon, CIT’s balance sheet will continue to deteriorate, which means its shares are worthless. Investors should stay away.
Trackback
4 comments so far
let’s fiddle with some numbers on paper.
3/31 CIT had $59.5B in long term debt inc $33.6B in senior unsecured and $2.1B in junior notes/ convertible units.
Let’s say they convert 75% of senior in a swap that returns $.25 of new senior unsecured and 2/7 of a share of CIT stock. That would cut about $19B of debt and add 7.2 billion shares, returning about 60 cents in the short term.
Then let’s say they convert 75% of the junior to 15 cents of new junior and 1/8 of a share of CIT. That would cut about another $1.2B in debt and issue a further 200 million shares, returning about 25 cents.
So CIT would pick up over $20B of equity to help fund their bank transfer, and the stock base would swell from 389 million shares to 7.8B.
So if CIT’s market cap were to rebound to 1/2 of its historic high, each new share of CIT could be worth $1.25 (or, what it’s at now)… but for the bondholders its a win: 100 cents of questionable bond could become 25 cents of new less questionable bond + 125 cents of equity at some point in the future.
Bad for current equity, but probably workable from the bondholder standpoint.
- Posted by Andrew“CIT shareholders should take their money and run” For those investors who bought CIT share would be a major lost, however, those who are have not earn this stock would be different. Remember this from our best adviser of all time, Warren Buffet “Fear when others are greedy, be greedy when others are fearful” I would said it time to entry these stock, because the government will definitely step in to rescue, no matter what. If the government ignore this, that I would said, Obama administration handling poorly. As we all know at this time of year, economic cycle has hit it bottom (trough) interest rate only 25% from the RBA. Forget about the basic equation: Equity = Assets - Liabilities, but to save the AMERICAN from running trouble.
- Posted by Hoang Thanh NguyenThat’s faulty logic Nguyen.
First, “be fearful when others are greedy and greedy when others are fearful”, true… but your advice itself sounds greedy, so maybe it’s right to be fearful?
Trite sayings are calming, but they are most often used as a tool of rationalization or excuse by those who do not fully understand.
Second, now that the private markets have shown that there IS a non government way to restructure CIT (when forced to action by a lack of gov’t safety net), the government will certainly think three times about taking direct action to intervene in CIT.
Third, you assume that government intervention would be profitable for stockholders. I believe you have not done enough research if you believe this assumption to be true. Government rescue (not just support, but straight out resscue) has become quite punitive, as it ought to be.
- Posted by AndrewLawndirt.com - Loans…
Cindy, unfortunately you are not alone in trying to secure financing. Small business loans have always been difficult to obtain even in good times. Lenders, especially today, need proof that cash flow is adequate to repay debt. I commented briefly in t…
- Posted by Lawndirt.com - Loans