Who are Bernanke’s top 25?

July 24, 2009

How many too-big-to-fail financials might be subject to additional oversight under Obama’s regulatory reform bill?  According to Ben Bernanke: roughly 25.

“On order of magnitude, a very rough guess would be 25 (firms). I would like to point out that virtually all those firms are organized as bank holding companies, or financial holding companies, which means the Federal Reserve already has umbrella supervision , so I would not envision the Fed’s oversight extending to any significant number of additional firms.”

Conveniently, the Fed publishes a list of the top BHCs.  Here are the top 50.  And you’ll never guess who just missed the cut at #26…


Not on the list is GE Capital, which is certainly too-big-to-fail.  And there are more than a few insurance companies that wouldn’t be allowed to go under.  By assets, the biggest insurers–besides MetLife, which is on the BHC list–are Prudential ($380 billion assets), Hartford ($290 billion), and Berkshire Hathaway ($282 billion).


Barry Ritholz has a link to a set of 3 e-mail “conversations” between John Talbot & Simon Johnson (@salon) you might find interesting.

Posted by StevenKs | Report as abusive

What if the fed concentrated its efforts on the middle of the bell curve. Who should give a crap about the tails when good policy in the middle takes care of the tails (and the majority of the people.)

Posted by DanO | Report as abusive

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/