<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FDIC lowers capital rule, but there&#8217;s a twist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/rolfe-winkler/2009/08/26/fdic-lowers-capital-rule-but-theres-a-twist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/rolfe-winkler/2009/08/26/fdic-lowers-capital-rule-but-theres-a-twist/</link>
	<description>Option ARMageddon</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 01:58:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/rolfe-winkler/2009/08/26/fdic-lowers-capital-rule-but-theres-a-twist/comment-page-1/#comment-1164</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 15:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/rolfe-winkler/?p=3371#comment-1164</guid>
		<description>Rolfe -on the question your raised, see Federal Reserve Regulation O - http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&amp;sid=635f26c4af3e2fe4327fd25ef4cb5638&amp;tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title12/12cfr215_main_02.tpl

It is pretty much prohibited.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rolfe -on the question your raised, see Federal Reserve Regulation O &#8211; <a href='http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&#038;sid=635f26c4af3e2fe4327fd25ef4cb5638&#038;tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title12/12cfr215_main_02.tpl'>http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/tex t-idx?c=ecfr&#038;sid=635f26c4af3e2fe4327fd25 ef4cb5638&#038;tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title12/12cfr2 15_main_02.tpl</a></p>
<p>It is pretty much prohibited.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/rolfe-winkler/2009/08/26/fdic-lowers-capital-rule-but-theres-a-twist/comment-page-1/#comment-1162</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 13:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/rolfe-winkler/?p=3371#comment-1162</guid>
		<description>Other maybe than a junior class of preferred, I&#039;m not aware of anything between preferred and common.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Other maybe than a junior class of preferred, I&#8217;m not aware of anything between preferred and common.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Bernier</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/rolfe-winkler/2009/08/26/fdic-lowers-capital-rule-but-theres-a-twist/comment-page-1/#comment-1146</link>
		<dc:creator>David Bernier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 04:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/rolfe-winkler/?p=3371#comment-1146</guid>
		<description>I would like to know more about seniority of claims of stakeholders in case of bankruptcy.  Who gets paid after
 holders of preferred shares, but before 
owners of common stock?

Thanks,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to know more about seniority of claims of stakeholders in case of bankruptcy.  Who gets paid after<br />
 holders of preferred shares, but before<br />
owners of common stock?</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
