Lunchtime Links 1-12

January 12, 2010

China surprises with bank reserve hike (Xin/Rabinovith, Reuters) The Fed could learn something from the PBOC. This sudden move to tighten bank lending maintains the PBOC’s reputation for acting without warning. If the Fed had a similar rep, U.S. lenders wouldn’t be so cavalier taking interest rate risk.

Special bankruptcy court for banks mulled in Senate (Younglai, Reuters) Interesting proposal for Dodd’s Senate financial reform bill. Can’t really comment until details are made available.

Citi unit grows — with Fed’s help (Enrich, WSJ) The fact that Citi subsidiary GTS is so important to the global financial system — and that its failure would be disastrous — is a good argument that regulators should find a way to wind it down…

Obama weighs tax on banks to cut deficit (Calmes, NYT) No details here either, but I expect whatever is proposed to pass, as the proposal will come not long after banks announce bonuses. Plan would raise as much as $120 billion. Taking money away from the financial sector, including its customers, is a necessary step towards de-leveraging the economy.

Devaluation sparks chaos in Caracas (Lyons/Crowe, WSJ)

Single stock dividend futures launched (Hedgeweek, ht Nick Gogerty) Not sure what the value of these is, but Nick points out that the leverage available to those trading futures means someone in need of a trading fix will get it…

Mark McGwire admits using steroids (ESPN) He cries a lot, complains of the pressure he was under and the difficulty of a 162 game schedule.

At a mighty 104, gone while still going strong (Fernandez/Schmidt, NYT)

Expense reports (Dilbert)

You played the joker too, right?



We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see

These Venezuela articles are so representative of the pathetic English language media coverage of Latin America. For 10 years now right-wing nuts, supply-side economists and other assorted idiots-in-suits have been predicting the demise of Venezuela. Any of these guys checked Chavez approval ratings compared to those of any US politician? Or when is the last time any of these guys actually went to Venezuela?

I agree you can debate Chavez policies, and he’s been no silver bullet for Venezuela, but this type of scare-mongering headlines are simply wrong, and anyone who believes the capitalism-at-all-costs is the best approach for Latin America has probably never spent any real time or effort here understaning LatAm.

Posted by Ward | Report as abusive

The dividend futures allow Europeans to recharacterize the income as capital gains and therefore avoid the dividend tax rates. Or something to that effect.
So, it’s not really used for trading so much as tax purposes.

Posted by br_add | Report as abusive

Jack is NOT amused. LOL!

Posted by EF | Report as abusive