<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CoreLogic: 24% of residential properties upside down</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/rolfe-winkler/2010/02/23/corelogic-24-of-residential-properties-upside-down/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/rolfe-winkler/2010/02/23/corelogic-24-of-residential-properties-upside-down/</link>
	<description>Option ARMageddon</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 01:58:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dogster</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/rolfe-winkler/2010/02/23/corelogic-24-of-residential-properties-upside-down/comment-page-1/#comment-5192</link>
		<dc:creator>dogster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 04:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/rolfe-winkler/?p=5433#comment-5192</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://wraft.blogspot.com/2010/02/juicing-housing-market.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Market analysis based on homeownership&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Market analysis based on homeownership</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanHess</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/rolfe-winkler/2010/02/23/corelogic-24-of-residential-properties-upside-down/comment-page-1/#comment-5175</link>
		<dc:creator>DanHess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 17:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/rolfe-winkler/?p=5433#comment-5175</guid>
		<description>Rolfe, good post, but one significant math error.  You said:

&quot;Subtract folks who owe more on their homes than they are worth and the home-ownership rate drops from 67% to 43%.&quot;

Actually, of owner-occupied units, 38% are mortgage-free according to the most recent available data.
http://www.allcountries.org/uscensus/1217_mortgage_characteristics_owner_occupied_units.html

Thus, of that 67% a 38% share or 25% of all residences are owned free-and clear by the resident.  Thus, 42% of all residences are owner-occupied and have a mortgage.
Thus, 24% of the 42% of homes with mortgages are underwater, or 10% of all residences.

Thus we have:
25% of residences owned-free and clear by the householder
32% of residences owned by householder, with a mortgage that is not underwater
10% of residences owned by a householder who is underwater
33% of householders rent

Thus, 57% and not 43% is the homeownership rate that you mean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rolfe, good post, but one significant math error.  You said:</p>
<p>&#8220;Subtract folks who owe more on their homes than they are worth and the home-ownership rate drops from 67% to 43%.&#8221;</p>
<p>Actually, of owner-occupied units, 38% are mortgage-free according to the most recent available data.<br />
<a href='http://www.allcountries.org/uscensus/1217_mortgage_characteristics_owner_occupied_units.html'>http://www.allcountries.org/uscensus/121 7_mortgage_characteristics_owner_occupie d_units.html</a></p>
<p>Thus, of that 67% a 38% share or 25% of all residences are owned free-and clear by the resident.  Thus, 42% of all residences are owner-occupied and have a mortgage.<br />
Thus, 24% of the 42% of homes with mortgages are underwater, or 10% of all residences.</p>
<p>Thus we have:<br />
25% of residences owned-free and clear by the householder<br />
32% of residences owned by householder, with a mortgage that is not underwater<br />
10% of residences owned by a householder who is underwater<br />
33% of householders rent</p>
<p>Thus, 57% and not 43% is the homeownership rate that you mean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick_Gogerty</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/rolfe-winkler/2010/02/23/corelogic-24-of-residential-properties-upside-down/comment-page-1/#comment-5172</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick_Gogerty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 13:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/rolfe-winkler/?p=5433#comment-5172</guid>
		<description>rolfe,  

nice point to raise, on what constitutes ownership, for ownership definitely drivers behavior in terms of walk aways.  

I wish more stats would show &quot;ownership&quot; on a debt equity basis like you mention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rolfe,  </p>
<p>nice point to raise, on what constitutes ownership, for ownership definitely drivers behavior in terms of walk aways.  </p>
<p>I wish more stats would show &#8220;ownership&#8221; on a debt equity basis like you mention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
