Lunchtime Links 2-5

Feb 5, 2010 17:18 UTC

Euro debt fears roil global markets (Shah, WSJ) The U.S. is less worse than Euro economies, so Euro trouble causes flight to the dollar. Funny that we’re viewed as quality: When you factor in the debt of state and local governments, we’re in similar trouble….never mind unfunded liabilities for Medicare and SS.

Moody’s warns about U.S. credit rating (FT) These warnings have been fairly frequent.

Bernanke’s exit strategy: tighter reserve requirements (Kessler, WSJ) A good op-ed from yesterday. Another way of sequestering excess reserves, besides paying banks not to lend them out, is to just require them not to.

Unemployment rate falls despite declining payrolls (Mutikani, Reuters) The hard data, for those interested, is here.

How banks can win despite being second (Eavis, WSJ) Modifying the first mortgage frees up homeowner income to service their home equity lines of credit and other second lien mortgages…

Why we keep getting poorer: housing costs rising as % of income (Charles Hugh Smith)

Biggest bubble in history is growing every day (Pesak, Bloomberg) He’s referring to China’s reserves.

13-year-old QB commits to USC (Carrosquillo, FoxNY)

Toyota… (imgur)

New ski warnings (CollegeHumor)

Global air traffic volume (note how it varies with the sun)…

COMMENT

It funny that Canada still gives development aid to China when you read the article “Biggest bubble in history is growing every day”.

This would be better spent at home.

Posted by MTLCAN | Report as abusive

Rickards: You can’t print your way out of debt

Jan 20, 2010 15:07 UTC

Reader note: This is Jim’s second piece in an ongoing debate with Warren Mosler about the economy. Here are links to previous posts in the series: Writer biographies / Mosler #1 / Rickards #1 / Mosler #2.  There will be one more post from each writer.

by James Rickards

Before I lay siege to Warren Mosler’s remedies, let me say he’s a brilliant guy I’ve admired for 25 years going back to his days at AVM.  I got reacquainted in 2004 when I lived in St. Croix and Warren ran for Congress from the Virgin Islands.  His campaign ads were 5-minute infomercials; tutorials on economics and gems of sound fiscal advice.  But this is a debate, so let’s begin.

Warren makes eleven points and I agree with two – the elimination of payroll taxes and converting banks into utilities.  Payroll tax elimination spurs consumption and stimulates job creation. As for banks, we need them, we just don’t need casinos that call themselves banks.  Bring back Glass-Steagall, separate deposit and loan functions from proprietary trading and banish the latter to hedge funds.  Speculation should survive on its own dime.

I don’t need to take the rest point-by-point because they’re the same thing – an unlimited belief in the Fed’s power to print money.  Warren calls for a $500 per capita state rebate, a federal job for all takers, direct Treasury funding of housing, unlimited deposit insurance, no debt ceiling, Treasury overdrafts at the Fed and federal purchase of foreclosed homes. He doesn’t propose free ice cream for children but I don’t see why not; just print some money and go for it!

Warren’s program would work if the world had as much faith in the dollar as he does.  But it doesn’t, and neither do the American people. If we were all captives of a government dollar monopoly with no alternative, then maybe his plan would work for awhile.  But we do have alternatives in land, art, commodities and the oldest form of money – gold.  It’s no coincidence that when FDR debased the dollar in 1934 he simultaneously banned private ownership of gold.  He knew citizens would hoard gold when he trashed the dollar so he made that illegal.  One of Reagan’s lasting gifts to the American people was a law in 1985 which made U.S. mint gold coins available to average citizens.  Now when the Fed cranks up the printing presses, citizens have a choice.  Foreign central banks have the same choice in terms of gold bullion and commodities such as oil and copper which serve as stores of value and industrial inputs.

Here’s where complexity theory comes in.   Each citizen, company and central bank is an interdependent agent with a threshold for dollar rejection based on the thresholds of others.  Some will not flee the dollar unless many others go first.  But some have already bought gold and others are on a hair trigger.  What does the complete system look like? Are we in the critical state where a small shift brings the entire edifice crashing down – the tipping point? It’s impossible to say, but we’re certainly closer than ever.  Warren’s cavalier approach to printing money as the cure for all ills guarantees the greatest disease of all – destruction of the dollar.

James G. Rickards is a writer, lawyer and economist. Twitter.com/JamesGRickards.

COMMENT

[...] by Happypixel on January 20th, 2010 at 07:19pm Rickards: You can’t print your way out of debt | Analysis … I don’t need to take the rest point-by-point because they’re the same thing %26ndash; [...]

Evening Links 12-6

Dec 6, 2009 21:08 UTC

(Reader note: One bug we’re still trying to work out is that links in the top line of a post aren’t “hot” in the front-page view of the blog. If you click “continue reading” the link is available)

The FBI agent inside the Galleon case (Goldstein, Reuters) More great work from Matt.

MIT team wins DARPA red balloon challenge (darpa.mil) But how did they do it?

Requiem for the dollar (James Grant, WSJ) A fun (and frustrating) piece to read. Grant is a good writer, but he throws provocative comments around without explaining them. He says we need to collateralize the dollar, presumably with gold, but acknowledges early in the article that the gold standard was far from perfect: “The lifespan of no monetary system since 1880 has been more than 30 or 40 years, including that of my beloved classical gold standard…” No doubt he has ideas to improve his “beloved” standard, and that would be useful to read. Too bad he doesn’t go into it.

Bair weighs loan principal cuts to fight foreclosure (Vekshin, Bloomberg) Writing off principal is the opposite of extend and pretend. But if Bair wants to pay for it using the Deposit Insurance Fund, she’ll have to stay aggressive with assessing insurance premiums on banks.

Amazon in secret plan to open high street shops (Davey, Times UK) Some brick and mortar for Amazon? Update: Amazon says “no plans” for physical stores. A non-denial denial…

The gambler who blew $127 million (Berzon, WSJ) “During a year-long gambling binge at the Caesars Palace and Rio casinos in 2007, Terrance Watanabe managed to lose nearly $127 million. The run is believed to be one of the biggest losing streaks by an individual in Las Vegas history.”

Schadenfreude Alert: Harvard in trouble (The Awl) This piece quotes another good article in this month’s Vanity Fair (have to buy the mag to read it).

The ultimate vanity plate (Taibbi, True/Slant) On the Porsche Cayenne owned by Morgan Stanley’s Rob Kindler: “2BG2FAIL” From Sorkin’s book.

Girl dumps tennis star over his 7-hr-per-day video game addiction (Telegraph)

NOT Obama’s job strategy…

COMMENT

The only tax some people will ever pay is the inflation tax.

Posted by Dan | Report as abusive

Gold as Armageddon insurance

Oct 7, 2009 18:47 UTC

Deflation could be the biggest threat to the economy, but gold — usually an inflation hedge — is reaching new highs. That’s because smart investors aren’t playing the inflation trade, they’re buying currency crisis insurance.

With the amount being spent by the public sector, with the huge amounts of leverage still in the system, there’s a palpable fear that America won’t be able to meet its obligations. Relative to GDP, the amount we’re borrowing to finance deficits makes us look irresponsible.

When such economies hit a wall, investors make a run on the currency, typically moving their assets to a stronger currency, like the dollar.

But this time the problem is the dollar, along with other leading paper currencies, all of which are threatened by profligate fiscal and monetary policies. So some investors want out of the system entirely. Gold, as my colleague Neil Collins noted earlier, is a way to do that.

The gold market is small enough that a decision by a handful of money managers to increase their asset allocation from, say, zero to 5 percent can move the market. All the gold ever mined would fit aboard an oil tanker; its total weight of 125,000 tons amounts to a few hours’ output for the U.S. steel industry.

But economists tell us that inflation isn’t a risk now. Are they wrong? No and yes.

The conventional way economists view inflation is to look at things like “output gaps.” When the economy falls below a level of output it previously achieved, it is said to have unemployed resources. If you think of inflation as workers demanding and getting higher wages, which leads to higher prices for the goods and services they produce, then inflation isn’t a threat.

So economists tell us more borrowing and money printing won’t be inflationary as long as people are unemployed.

One problem: Their models ignore the fact that peak output was artificially inflated by a credit binge. Borrowing more to sustain an unsustainable level of spending borders on insanity, yet that’s precisely what such economic models tell us we need to do.

There’s an extra variable these models don’t account for — the Chinese and all major lenders to the United States. They don’t much care if our employment rate is below desirable levels. At a certain point, they may recognize that the United States is acting like a banana republic and choose to stop lending.

When that happens, we might see a “sudden stop” event: Capital inflows to the private and public sector cease as everyone races to get out of dollars.

Eric Sprott, CEO of Sprott Asset Management has $4.5 billion under management, $2 billion of which is invested in physical bullion — silver and gold — stored at banks in Canada. Another large chunk is invested in gold stocks.

He views gold as an insurance policy against both inflation and deflation. Central bank quantitative easing policies mean “we’re printing paper currency like crazy,” so he doubts the long-run value of fiat currencies.

On the flip side, if central banks pull back, you could enter a deflationary spiral, essentially a banking collapse, in which case “your deposits wouldn’t be returned to you. Better to have physical gold in your control.”

Most economists and investors still labor under the illusion that there’s a way out of debt that doesn’t involve a drastic reduction in the paper value of wealth. Smart investors aren’t so sure and want at least a portion of their assets out of the financial system.

A dollar crisis isn’t necessarily coming tomorrow, so there’s no guarantee gold’s price will keep going higher. Still, gold is a decent insurance policy against economic Armageddon.

COMMENT

Cheap single trip travel insurance can help cover a number of issues in travel. However, there are ten countries where travel insurance is not issued. Insurance agencies use travel advisories by the government to determine countries that are just too dangerous to cover.

Insurance
http://cheapsingletriptravelinsurance.co m/

Posted by jimamily | Report as abusive

Update on Walk-Away Congresswoman

Reuters Staff
May 23, 2008 18:48 UTC

Democratic Congresswoman Laura Richardson has even Hillary Clinton beat for selective memory problems. Remember how Hillary kept repeating the Bosnia story? That she dodged sniper fire, etc.? She always knew it was a lie, but she needed a concrete example of her foreign policy experience. It was telling that that was the only story she could come up with. I hope the Clintons (and the Bushes) disappear from American politics permanently.

But I digress. Here’s what Richardson said of her property in Sacramento in a statement this past Wednesday:

the residential property in Sacramento California is not in foreclosure and has NOT been seized by the bank.

Moreover:

I have worked with my lender to complete a loan modification and have renegotiated the terms of the agreement — with no special provisions. I fully intend to fulfill all financial obligations of this property.

These are bald-faced lies. According to the WSJ:

The Sacramento home of Rep. Laura Richardson was sold in a public auction two weeks ago for $388,000….James York, the Sacramento broker who bought the three-bedroom, 1.5-bathroom home, rejected the idea that the home hadn’t been seized. The sale of the home was announced in March. “She’s walked away from the property,” he said. “I would be happy to resell her the home for the $535,000.”

Recall from the original story:

The Southern California Democrat bought the house for $535,000 with no money down in January 2007 and owed nearly $575,000 to Washington Mutual when the mortgage was sold earlier this month at a significant loss to Red Rock Mortgage Inc.

And there is additional irony here:

Richardson didn’t vote on the housing rescue deal that passed the House of Representatives two weeks ago and in a statement attributed her absence to her father’s funeral. But Richardson did vote last fall in favor of the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act, which passed and prevents the federal government from charging income tax on debt forgiven as a consequence of foreclosure.

COMMENT

Yes Dollar rate has increased much against other countries rates.

New writedown at HSBC

Reuters Staff
May 12, 2008 18:10 UTC

The BBC reports on the latest subprime writedown at a major bank. The conventional wisdom is that most of the subprime related credit losses that have to be taken already have been. Going forward, a larger problem for bank net income will likely be increasing provisions for loan losses, as opposed to straight writedowns on holdings gone South. Here’s a list of writedowns to date for major banks worldwide:

MAIN CREDIT LOSSES SO FAR

  • Citigroup: $40.7bn
  • UBS: $38bn
  • Merrill Lynch: $31.7bn
  • HSBC: $15.6bn
  • Bank of America: $14.9bn
  • Morgan Stanley $12.6bn
  • Royal Bank of Scotland: $12bn
  • JP Morgan Chase: $9.7bn
  • Washington Mutual: $8.3bn
  • Deutsche Bank: $7.5bn
  • Wachovia: $7.3bn
  • Credit Agricole: $6.6bn
  • Credit Suisse: $6.3bn
  • Mizuho Financial $5.5bn
  • Bear Stearns: $3.2bn
  • Barclays: $3.2bn

Source: Bloomberg and company reports

The main impact of credit losses is that they reduce bank lending. A handy way to think about it, is that banks typically lend out $10 for every $1 in capital on the books. So credit losses of this magnitude can be incredibly DEflationary.

(more…)

The "Reflation" Solution?

Reuters Staff
Apr 14, 2008 22:23 UTC

Didn’t think I’d see an op-ed like this in the Journal. The editors themselves hate Fed easing, and for good reason. Inflation hurts everyone in the economy except for those in debt; those who, financially-speaking, have behaved most irresponsibly. But this opinion piece says the Fed shouldn’t feel ashamed about printing money in order to get us through the housing crisis.

The author’s fundamental argument is that if the Fed just prints money, and lots of it, that the ensuing inflation will rescue the housing market and, thus, the economy. He says this would be preferable to nationalizing the housing market, which seems to be the only alternative in his mind.

Nationalizing the housing market may be a fait accompli…..but done correctly it probably doesn’t have to be a huge burden for taxpayers. Lenders who want to be bailed-out should be forced to take massive writedowns on the bad loans they want to pawn off on taxpayers. If the Treasury buys bad home loans at a really good price, taxpayers don’t have to lose that much in the long-run….

If the Fed “prints money”, the ensuing inflation would only serve the interests of those in debt by reducing the value of their debts in real terms.

Inflation happens when the supply of money increases relative to the supply of goods and services in the economy. More paper currency chasing the same amount of goods and services means each individual unit of currency has less purchasing power; it has less value. Savers lose because the dollars they’ve saved buy less after a period of inflation. Debtors win b/c the debts they owe are smaller in real terms after that same period of inflation.

Say I take out a $100,000 loan due next year. To make the math easy, let’s assume my lender isn’t going to charge interest….a rich uncle perhaps. If the value of the dollar declines 6% over the year, then $94,000 of today’s dollars will be sufficient to pay back the $100,000 loan next year.

Of course, most lenders do charge interest and if they EXPECT inflation will decrease the value of the dollars with which they’re paid back, they’ll simply charge HIGHER interest rates to offset the loss in value of those dollars.

Folks who have already taken out loans at fixed interest rates would benefit from higher inflation. New borrowers and those with adjustable rates would be forced to pay higher interest rates.

More inflation could also spark a run on dollar assets.

But perhaps the main reason this is foolish is that if the Fed lets inflation run wild now, it will just take more draconian monetary measures to get it back under control in the future. Take a look at the steps Paul Volcker was forced to resort to in order to tame inflation back in the early 80s. To beat inflation he had to increase the Fed Funds rate to 20%(!) by late 1980. It’s at 2.25% now. How many of my readers who bought a house in the early 80s recall what mortgage rates were back then? Would you believe they got as high as 18% for a 30 year fixed rate mortgage?

According to Wikipedia, raising rates that high to tame inflation “contributed to the significant recession the U.S. economy experienced in the early 1980s, which included the highest unemployment levels since the Great Depression.”

So far Bernanke has laid off the inflation lever. All of us who avoided overpaying for a house should pray that he continues to.

(more…)

COMMENT

I don’t think that it is possible to return to gold standard, if ever it existed years ago.

  •