Housing Bill advances in Senate

Reuters Staff
Apr 2, 2008 23:25 UTC

Rs and Ds in the Senate have agreed on the basic framework for a new housing bill, according to the NYT. The basic framework appears to include the follwing:

  • $100 million to expand counseling for homeowners at risk of defaulting on their loans
  • tax-exempt bonds to let local housing agencies refinance subprime mortgages
  • $4 billion in grants for local governments to buy foreclosed properties
  • several tax provisions, including a credit of $7000 for purchasers of foreclosed properties that have been sitting vacant, and a break for struggling home-builders, allowing them to claim current losses against taxes paid in earlier, more profitable years
  • a cap on mortgages insured by the Federal Housing Administration at $550,000 in the most expensive real estate markets. The cap had been $363k before Congress “temporarily” raised it to $730k as part of the Stimulus package passed in February.

So far, so good. No behemoth bailouts above. But there are two more contentious provisions being pitched by Democrats that are likely to be introduced as amendments:

  • Connecticut Senator Chris Dodd wants the federal government to insure $400 billion in new loans for homeowners. Scary.
  • Illinois Senator Dick Durbin wants to give bankruptcy judges the power to alter the terms of certain mortgages. Also very scary. This would raise the cost of mortgages for everyone else as lenders boost interest rates to compensate for future risk that loans could be written down by judicial fiat…..

I keep listening to the news bulletin speak about receiving free online grant applications so I have been looking around for the most excellent site to get one. Could you advise me please, where could i acquire some?

YouTube: Hope Don’t pay my Bills

Reuters Staff
Dec 31, 2007 18:59 UTC

I disagree completely with this video’s conclusions. I will explain why in my next post. Still, it’s pretty darn creative and worthy of posting here.


we have long followed been aware of the subjects we hear from Dr. Paul…In this diffcult time of sorting truth from fiction and of re-assessing previously held positions, it is curious to us that you hold Dr. Paul to such a strict standard when he supposed previous positions are all contained in ‘newsletters’. Why not look to his ‘talk the talk and walk the walk’ congressional votes and submitted legislation – no other candidate in either party has such an illustrious committment to the constituion, smaller goverment and personal responsibility – they only know about ‘pandering’! Marie White, Arkansas

Posted by Anonymous | Report as abusive