<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Liverpool 4 Arsenal 2 &#8212; your views on an instant classic</title>
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/soccer/2008/04/08/liverpool-4-arsenal-2-your-views-on-an-instant-classic/</link>
	<description>World Soccer views and news</description>
	<pubDate>Sun,  7 Sep 2008 08:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Fylan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/soccer/2008/04/08/liverpool-4-arsenal-2-your-views-on-an-instant-classic/#comment-337935</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Fylan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 13:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.reuters.com/soccer/2008/04/08/liverpool-4-arsenal-2-your-views-on-an-instant-classic/#comment-337935</guid>
		<description>Hi Five Times, and fair point over the transfer fees. It's clear that Benitez has been absolutely vindicated in insisting on those signings, even though the fees were of the nose-bleed variety.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Five Times, and fair point over the transfer fees. It&#8217;s clear that Benitez has been absolutely vindicated in insisting on those signings, even though the fees were of the nose-bleed variety.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Five Times</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/soccer/2008/04/08/liverpool-4-arsenal-2-your-views-on-an-instant-classic/#comment-337923</link>
		<dc:creator>Five Times</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 06:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.reuters.com/soccer/2008/04/08/liverpool-4-arsenal-2-your-views-on-an-instant-classic/#comment-337923</guid>
		<description>John sums it up very nicely, though I disagree on the video referee part as I wouldn't like football to be too sanitised and thus taking the drama away from it all... even at the expense of my beloved team.

Shyam is a true fan and I respect that. Win or lose, always support your team.

And Kevin, those who think Liverpool paid too much for Torres or even Mascherano should really do more research.

http://www.footballeconomy.com/stats/stats_turnover_07.htm

Of course Wenger has some really spectacular cheaper buys like Henry and Fabregas but let's compare apples with apples.
None of the players in the list above except for maybe Van Nistelroy has contributed as much in his 1st season as Torres which makes the price of Torres really an absolute bargain. So please £21m doesn't really warrant all the exaggeration especially when you look at that list.

And when you look at the even bigger picture...
http://www.top-ten-10.com/sports/football/football_transfers.htm

Torres's sum become even more paltry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John sums it up very nicely, though I disagree on the video referee part as I wouldn&#8217;t like football to be too sanitised and thus taking the drama away from it all&#8230; even at the expense of my beloved team.</p>
<p>Shyam is a true fan and I respect that. Win or lose, always support your team.</p>
<p>And Kevin, those who think Liverpool paid too much for Torres or even Mascherano should really do more research.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.footballeconomy.com/stats/stats_turnover_07.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.footballeconomy.com/stats/sta ts_turnover_07.htm</a></p>
<p>Of course Wenger has some really spectacular cheaper buys like Henry and Fabregas but let&#8217;s compare apples with apples.<br />
None of the players in the list above except for maybe Van Nistelroy has contributed as much in his 1st season as Torres which makes the price of Torres really an absolute bargain. So please £21m doesn&#8217;t really warrant all the exaggeration especially when you look at that list.</p>
<p>And when you look at the even bigger picture&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://www.top-ten-10.com/sports/football/football_transfers.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.top-ten-10.com/sports/footbal l/football_transfers.htm</a></p>
<p>Torres&#8217;s sum become even more paltry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/soccer/2008/04/08/liverpool-4-arsenal-2-your-views-on-an-instant-classic/#comment-337920</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 23:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.reuters.com/soccer/2008/04/08/liverpool-4-arsenal-2-your-views-on-an-instant-classic/#comment-337920</guid>
		<description>Let's set a couple of things straight: pinging the ball around is very impressive, but scoring goals and preventing the other side scoring is what football is all about.

And as for the penalty, nobody is mentioning Flamini's blatant handball as he controlled the ball in the build up to Diaby's goal. The ref missed it. Maybe he made a mistake for the penalty. That's football too.

Until they bring in video replays (which I thing FIFA are too old-fashioned and short-sighted to do) referees will make mistakes.

The fact is that Liverpool were behind 3 times in this tie and came back to win - that shows incredible willpower, and in the case of Torres and Hyypia, incredible skill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s set a couple of things straight: pinging the ball around is very impressive, but scoring goals and preventing the other side scoring is what football is all about.</p>
<p>And as for the penalty, nobody is mentioning Flamini&#8217;s blatant handball as he controlled the ball in the build up to Diaby&#8217;s goal. The ref missed it. Maybe he made a mistake for the penalty. That&#8217;s football too.</p>
<p>Until they bring in video replays (which I thing FIFA are too old-fashioned and short-sighted to do) referees will make mistakes.</p>
<p>The fact is that Liverpool were behind 3 times in this tie and came back to win - that shows incredible willpower, and in the case of Torres and Hyypia, incredible skill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mohammad</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/soccer/2008/04/08/liverpool-4-arsenal-2-your-views-on-an-instant-classic/#comment-337911</link>
		<dc:creator>mohammad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 15:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.reuters.com/soccer/2008/04/08/liverpool-4-arsenal-2-your-views-on-an-instant-classic/#comment-337911</guid>
		<description>what a good game off football the best team over 2 legs won</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what a good game off football the best team over 2 legs won</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clement</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/soccer/2008/04/08/liverpool-4-arsenal-2-your-views-on-an-instant-classic/#comment-337903</link>
		<dc:creator>clement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 12:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.reuters.com/soccer/2008/04/08/liverpool-4-arsenal-2-your-views-on-an-instant-classic/#comment-337903</guid>
		<description>What's most upsetting is that in 5 years, this champions league wont be remembered for Arsenals sublime football. Because of a very controversial (personally i think it was a load of crp) penalty with minutes remaining in a second leg clash. Bottom line is Liverpool buy Torres and go through to the semis while injury plagued Arsenal develop a beautiful game with raw young talent for a season that will be esentially forgotten in the history books.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s most upsetting is that in 5 years, this champions league wont be remembered for Arsenals sublime football. Because of a very controversial (personally i think it was a load of crp) penalty with minutes remaining in a second leg clash. Bottom line is Liverpool buy Torres and go through to the semis while injury plagued Arsenal develop a beautiful game with raw young talent for a season that will be esentially forgotten in the history books.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/soccer/2008/04/08/liverpool-4-arsenal-2-your-views-on-an-instant-classic/#comment-337897</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 10:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.reuters.com/soccer/2008/04/08/liverpool-4-arsenal-2-your-views-on-an-instant-classic/#comment-337897</guid>
		<description>arsneal can only go as far as long as senderos keeps his head...two goals last night were arguably down to his poor defending...toure should have played with gallas and eboue tucking in at right back with walcott down the wing...poor decision by wenger</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>arsneal can only go as far as long as senderos keeps his head&#8230;two goals last night were arguably down to his poor defending&#8230;toure should have played with gallas and eboue tucking in at right back with walcott down the wing&#8230;poor decision by wenger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Fylan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/soccer/2008/04/08/liverpool-4-arsenal-2-your-views-on-an-instant-classic/#comment-337895</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Fylan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 08:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.reuters.com/soccer/2008/04/08/liverpool-4-arsenal-2-your-views-on-an-instant-classic/#comment-337895</guid>
		<description>That's very nicely put, Shyam. The Theo Walcott moment was indeed a special one, and the match would have been remembered for that sublime run had Liverpool not gone straight up the other end and scored.
I wonder how many Arsenal fans will wonder after that game if Wenger has been a bit too parsimonious with the transfer funds available. Liverpool paid top dollar (far too much, one might even say) for two players -- Mascherano and Torres -- but have been rewarded with a place in the semi-finals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s very nicely put, Shyam. The Theo Walcott moment was indeed a special one, and the match would have been remembered for that sublime run had Liverpool not gone straight up the other end and scored.<br />
I wonder how many Arsenal fans will wonder after that game if Wenger has been a bit too parsimonious with the transfer funds available. Liverpool paid top dollar (far too much, one might even say) for two players &#8212; Mascherano and Torres &#8212; but have been rewarded with a place in the semi-finals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shyam  Tallamraju</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/soccer/2008/04/08/liverpool-4-arsenal-2-your-views-on-an-instant-classic/#comment-337894</link>
		<dc:creator>Shyam  Tallamraju</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 06:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.reuters.com/soccer/2008/04/08/liverpool-4-arsenal-2-your-views-on-an-instant-classic/#comment-337894</guid>
		<description>So why this is so heartbreaking this time around? Because this also puts an end to beauty of imagination and that quintessential dream of any football purist: unknown talent moulded into a cohesive whole who can go on to play and win beautifully. Is it too much to ask for?

In the last few years Arsene Wenger has created a team of relative unknowns whose combined value of acquisition of 30 million pounds was what Manchester United paid for one Wayne Rooney. 

 Even yesterday, with no disrespect to Liverpool, they played some outstanding football and passed Liverpool out of the park. Just when they thought they had a victory the opponents were awarded a dodgy penalty which they duly converted and it is the same old story for Arsenal. 

The beauty of the game is that it can lead to memorable upsets and magnificent victories. In both these fronts Arsenal became the fall guy. Arsene Wenger wanted to prove that talent short on passports and high on technique can win trophies and win them beautifully. He wanted to show that one doesn't require money (Chelsea, Man u, Liverpool et al) to mould great teams. He wanted to show that this time Arsenal can win trophies and play by his vision by supplementing beauty with resilience. He wanted too show the world how the game is to be played in a time and age when money does all the talking.

Arsene Wenger has fallen short. Does this mean the demise of dreams? Does this mean the end of imagination? Does this mean he has to go into the next season and spend a fortune on new 'star' players who will help him win games in important matches? Does this mean that natural talent and youthful innocence don't stand a chance in the high-cauldron of football aesthetics?

I hope not. The matter is simple and clear: I will always support Arsenal till i die. I may not win trophies but when young Theo Walcott runs 80 yards through five players and makes an inch perfect pass for the forward to convert then i am transported into a new footballing realm of dreams and aesthetics. That moment will be enough for me to last a whole season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So why this is so heartbreaking this time around? Because this also puts an end to beauty of imagination and that quintessential dream of any football purist: unknown talent moulded into a cohesive whole who can go on to play and win beautifully. Is it too much to ask for?</p>
<p>In the last few years Arsene Wenger has created a team of relative unknowns whose combined value of acquisition of 30 million pounds was what Manchester United paid for one Wayne Rooney. </p>
<p> Even yesterday, with no disrespect to Liverpool, they played some outstanding football and passed Liverpool out of the park. Just when they thought they had a victory the opponents were awarded a dodgy penalty which they duly converted and it is the same old story for Arsenal. </p>
<p>The beauty of the game is that it can lead to memorable upsets and magnificent victories. In both these fronts Arsenal became the fall guy. Arsene Wenger wanted to prove that talent short on passports and high on technique can win trophies and win them beautifully. He wanted to show that one doesn&#8217;t require money (Chelsea, Man u, Liverpool et al) to mould great teams. He wanted to show that this time Arsenal can win trophies and play by his vision by supplementing beauty with resilience. He wanted too show the world how the game is to be played in a time and age when money does all the talking.</p>
<p>Arsene Wenger has fallen short. Does this mean the demise of dreams? Does this mean the end of imagination? Does this mean he has to go into the next season and spend a fortune on new &#8217;star&#8217; players who will help him win games in important matches? Does this mean that natural talent and youthful innocence don&#8217;t stand a chance in the high-cauldron of football aesthetics?</p>
<p>I hope not. The matter is simple and clear: I will always support Arsenal till i die. I may not win trophies but when young Theo Walcott runs 80 yards through five players and makes an inch perfect pass for the forward to convert then i am transported into a new footballing realm of dreams and aesthetics. That moment will be enough for me to last a whole season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PETT`Y</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/soccer/2008/04/08/liverpool-4-arsenal-2-your-views-on-an-instant-classic/#comment-337893</link>
		<dc:creator>PETT`Y</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 06:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.reuters.com/soccer/2008/04/08/liverpool-4-arsenal-2-your-views-on-an-instant-classic/#comment-337893</guid>
		<description>FOR ALL WHO FEEL AGGRIEVED,JUST REALIZE LIVERPOOL WAS THE BETTER TEAM,,WITH ALOT OF CHAMPIONS LEAGUE EXPERIENCE,,ESPECIALLY IN THE LAST COUPLE YEARS,,SO TO ALL EVANS,HENRY ,,,GITAU,,PLEASE GET USED TO OUR WINNING WAYS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FOR ALL WHO FEEL AGGRIEVED,JUST REALIZE LIVERPOOL WAS THE BETTER TEAM,,WITH ALOT OF CHAMPIONS LEAGUE EXPERIENCE,,ESPECIALLY IN THE LAST COUPLE YEARS,,SO TO ALL EVANS,HENRY ,,,GITAU,,PLEASE GET USED TO OUR WINNING WAYS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PETT`Y</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/soccer/2008/04/08/liverpool-4-arsenal-2-your-views-on-an-instant-classic/#comment-337892</link>
		<dc:creator>PETT`Y</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 05:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.reuters.com/soccer/2008/04/08/liverpool-4-arsenal-2-your-views-on-an-instant-classic/#comment-337892</guid>
		<description>OH YEAH LIVERPOOL,,,NEVER EVER WALK ALONE.WHAT A CLASSIC MATCH....NOW ALL WAY TILL WE LIFT THE CUP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OH YEAH LIVERPOOL,,,NEVER EVER WALK ALONE.WHAT A CLASSIC MATCH&#8230;.NOW ALL WAY TILL WE LIFT THE CUP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
