Latin American complexities — Part three: Mexico

March 9, 2009

This is the fourth instalment in our look at the wacky world of Latin American championships having started with an introduction and then analysed Peru’s interesting league system and moved on to Uruguay.  

Today, we’ve reached Mexico and it’s a goody.

Mexico has some of the finest stadiums in Latin America and pays some of the highest wages. It is also notable for having a system in which the championship’s best team repeatedly fails to win the title.

Like several countries, Mexico holds two championships per season, the Apertura and Clausura. There is no overall champion.

Each championships consists of a qualifying stage follow by a knockout stage, known as the Liguilla.

In the qualifying stage, the 18 teams play each other once — but are curiously divided into three groups. The top two teams in each group qualify for the quarter-finals while the two best teams from the remainder, regardless of group, also go through.

There are two major drawbacks: some groups often turn out to be much stronger than others and it is possible for a team to finish bottom of their group and have more points than the leaders of a different group; it is also common for the best team in the qualifying stage to then get unceremoniously dumped out in the quarter-finals.

Of the last five champions, only Pachuca also had the best overall record in the qualifying stage.

To complicate matters further, relegation is decided over three full seasons — which means six championships. This makes it theoretically possible for a team to win the championship and get relegated at the same time.

Tigres UANL came close to achieving this unique feat. They were relegated in 1996 and also qualified for the play offs, but lost to Necaxa in the quarter-finals.

PHOTO: Toluca’s Carlos Esquivel looks surprised during a Mexican League match against Tigres at the Universitario stadium in Monterrey November 8, 2008. REUTERS/Tomas Bravo

4 comments

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/

[...] original here:  Latin American complexities — Part three: Mexico Tags: argentina, contributors, entertainment, home, latin-america, News, picture, Premier [...]

nice!please visit my blogwww.sportsworker27,blogspot.com

I would have to agree with this one. Mexican championship is very weird, I mean there are sometimes when a team starts playing very well, but since there are some other tournaments running along the Championship (Libertadores, Sudamericana) teams get a lot of injuries and at the end it seems that even the worst team on the tournament can win the trophy. It is also worth to mention that they have a pre-pre-Libertadores to qualify to Libertadores tournament, and it’s not played in Mexico. My understanding is that this game schema (Liguilla and Campeonato Regular) is due to that way a lot of people will go to the games and all the teams can have the chance to win.Regards,

Posted by StrayChild | Report as abusive

Am I the only one who is starting to like the Latin American competitions more and more?

Posted by Hans Moman | Report as abusive

[...] This is the final instalment in our look at the peculiarities of Latin American championships, after an introduction, a tour through Peru, and on to Uruguay and Mexico.  [...]

Blame the USA for Latin America’s championship formats. With 16 NBA teams and 16 NHL teams making the playoffs, that’s where Latin America got the inspiration

Posted by Footballer | Report as abusive