Reuters Soccer Blog

World Soccer views and news

Was McCarthy taking the mick at Old Trafford?

December 16, 2009

RTR1JOCW1mccarthy

Did Wolverhampton Wanderers manager Mick McCarthy damage the integrity of the Premier League or did he make a valid, pragmatic choice to help keep his side safe by playing a virtual reserve team that lost 3-0 at Manchester United on Tuesday?

Most Wolves fans felt cheated when they saw that the team he fielded at Old Trafford showed 10 outfield changes from the side that beat Tottenham Hotspur on Saturday with only goalkeeper Marcus Hahnemann keeping his place.

They paid 42 pounds for a ticket as well as making the long trip from Wolverhampton to Manchester on a freezing night and most did not appreciate what they perceived to be a totally defeatist act by the manager.

The message the fans got was: “We’ve no real chance of beating United, so I’m keeping the first choice players for the important game with Burnley at the weekend — one we CAN win.”

McCarthy defended his action by saying: “They were all first-team squad players who played tonight, not reserves and I have to say there were some really good performances. That team did as well as we did against Arsenal and Chelsea.

“It was my decision and I took it and the responsibility lies with me. Burnley are having a good season and we have to be fully at it…I’m not prepared to get injuries before Sunday because then we have Liverpool, Manchester City and West Ham.

“I’ve got 20 players in my squad and I’ll need all of them between now and January.”

But what if he had done the same thing at Spurs on Saturday. Virtually no-one, not even the most diehard of Wolves fans, thought they would win that match, yet they did.

It was also not a foregone conclusion United would have beaten Wolves’ first team either.

The champions are experiencing one of their worst injury crises for years, have not been playing all that well and lost at home to Villa on Saturday. Wolves’ first XI may have been good enough to force a draw — or even win it if they were lucky.

McCarthy is right to put the needs of his club before those of any other and to do all he can to keep them in the Premier League — but his action unbalances the competition.

Will he play a weakened side every time he now prepares for a game he does not think Wolves can win — saving his best players for the games he thinks they can?

Premier League Rule E20 states that clubs are required to field full-strength sides in every match, and they are also supposed to field full-strength sides in FA Cup and League Cup games as well.

As every fan knows, the nature of both those competitions has changed over the last decade — and not entirely for the best. Managers field weaker teams in the cups to save their top players for Premier League (or Champions League) matches.

There is nothing wrong with the squad system per se, but I think it would do great harm to the Premier League if managers began to bring the same practice to the league competition on a regular basis.

We will no doubt soon find out what Chelsea manager Carlo Ancelotti and Arsenal boss Arsene Wenger think about Wolves virtually gifting three points to United in the race for the title.

Mr McCarthy has taken a bold, but curious step and only time will tell whether anyone is brave enough to follow his lead.

PHOTO:Wolverhampton Wanderers coach Mick McCarthy REUTERS/Nigel Roddis

Comments

Well said Mike, I agree with you.
I think that a great deal of harm would be done to the validity of the competition as a whole if such decisions as these, on this scale, became the norm. It would be farcical to say the least.
It may be technically justified to be so pragmatic but is it professionally ethical to play these ‘games’, by ‘playing safe’ and without really playing the game as it should be done in every match?
The season would be filled with a whole bunch of ‘what if?’ results, the table a sham and a lot of fans would rightly feel cheated of seeing the best kind of performance from their teams that they pay good money for.
Yes, things have changed a lot and it certainly seems given nowadays that key players are protected for the up coming ‘bigger matches’, but otherwise it should definitely be the case that the strongest sides are out there playing on those pitches every time!
That’s what ALL fans deserve to see for those fees!

Posted by peanut1 | Report as abusive
 

The moment Wolves were promoted, there is little doubt that many of their loyal fans would have been thinking one thing when the fixtures were published: when do we play at Old Trafford? To play United on a freezing Tuesday night in December was bad enough but McCarthy’s thoughtless decision added an entirely avoidable insult. And this from a team that had come away from its last away game three days earlier with three points at White Hart Lane. Ill thought-out, defeatist and showed a blatant disregard for the interests of the fans. A lot more neutrals will be hoping Wolves make an immediate return to the Championship than did 24 hours ago.

Posted by milominder | Report as abusive
 

Dear All,

Before you start taking the moral highground, you have to remember it looks very different from a manager’s perspective, especially if you are in a relegation scrap. Would Wolves fan have forgiven McCarthy if he had lost the match and several key players to injury at Old Trafford and then, consequently, dropped points in the relegation dogfight against Burnley? Wouldn’t the argument for most people then be that he made a short-sighted team selection for a match Wolves were always going to lose, no matter what team they fielded? McCarthy was not the first manager to do this and he certainly won’t be the last. At the end of the day, he did field a line-up of first-ream players who are all in the squad and legally I see nothing wrong with his decision.

Posted by Magicwand | Report as abusive
 

Well at the end of the day if arsenal can field 11 ’2nd team players’ in the carling cup then nothing should be said of Mick Mccarthy. He’s thinking of the bigger picture. For wolves to stay up theyn need to beat teams around them in the league not teams in the top half they come as a bonus.

Posted by muzzaavfc | Report as abusive
 

Were the players selected all in the first team squad?

Posted by jonnyontheball | Report as abusive
 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
  •