Reuters Soccer Blog

World Soccer views and news

Torres is a one-goal striker and a steal for Chelsea

February 1, 2011

SOCCER-EURO/Will Fernando Torres ever recapture that heady mix of fearlessness, ruthlessness and irresistible skill he showed in his first 24-goal season at Anfield?

Is £50 million enough to buy you a strike rate of a goal every 1.375 games?

You know what? It doesn’t matter.

Liverpool needed a 24-goals-a-season striker but Chelsea don’t. Chelsea have spent so much money for a player who can score one goal rather than 24, or to put it another way, the goal.

Chelsea would love to win a Premier League and FA Cup double every season, I’m sure, but domestic dominance is not the target for Roman Abramovich and hasn’t been for a while. It is no secret that the trophy Abramovich and everyone else at the club really want is the Champions League and in Torres they have acquired a player to take them over the line.

Forget the forlorn figure who limped his way around the World Cup in South Africa and recall the man whose pace and touch left Germany’s Philipp Lahm for dead and produced the winning goal for Spain in the final of Euro 2008.

If Torres scores one Chelsea goal all season he will be judged a success, as long as that goal is the one that edges his new club past Barcelona in the semi-finals, say, or clatters past Edwin van der Sar and in off the post in the final at Wembley.

One goal would be worth £50 million all on its own for a club like Chelsea. As long as it’s the goal.

PHOTO: Spain’s Fernando Torres (C) scores past Germany goalkeeper Jens Lehmann (L) as Philipp Lahm reacts during the Euro 2008 final at Ernst Happel Stadium in Vienna, June 29, 2008. REUTERS/Christian Charisius

Comments

Chelsea bought the best striker in the world, that’s all.

Posted by valentinv | Report as abusive
 

The best striker in the world may be stretching it a little but certainly one of the best and with a fantastic track trcord compared to, say, Andy Carroll.

Posted by Kevin Fylan | Report as abusive
 

To get Torres into that position, Chelsea might need to play above their limits and quite frankly, I can’t see them beating Real Madrid or Barcelona over two legs. Or even on the night, in the final. Either way, I think paying 50 million quid for a one-goal striker is ridculous. Why couldn’t Drogba, who is a better player than Torres any day of the week, Anelka or Kalou score that CL-winning goal if Chelsea make it to Wembley? I think time will tell that Liverpool got value for money in Carroll and Suarez while Chelsea bought exactly the opposite in a washed-up, injury-rabaged Torres.

Posted by red_devil | Report as abusive
 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
  •